Koppula Shobha, v. Government of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
SRIJUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WP(TR} NO: 10 oF…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
SRIJUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WP(TR} NO: 10 oF…
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H,GH COURTFOR rHE SJ F rEr_A N GA NA a r n voenrf,Jf oo
'fl,jl,l:E^i,:x.,uJ?,mlP.idil!.
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Between;
WP(TR} NO: 10 oF 2017
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleasedto declare
a) that the posts in DIET B.Ed. Colleges viz., Principal,SeniorLecturer& Lecturer were / are llable to be filled bypersons belonging to andholdingthe posts in the feeder categories in respective local cadres.
b) That thepersons (Z.P.teachers) who were / arenot belongingto and holding the posts in the feeder categories in respectivelocal cadres are not entitledto be considered, selected andpromoted to thepostsof Principals, Senior Lecturersand Lecturers in DIET /Lecturersin IASE / STE /SCERT.
c) declare that nopromotionscan be effected withoutfirstissuingprovisional seniorlty list ofperson in feedercategory, receiving objections and finalizingthe seniority list.
d) attempt to consider andpromote personswho are or who were originally Z.P. employees isillegal and arbitrary beingin violation of A.P.P.E. (Old & RDR) order 1975 and Article14 and16 of the Constitutionof lndia'
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI SRINIVASA RAOMA'DIRAJU
Counsel for Respondents:GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THEHON,BLE SRI JUSTICET' VINOD KUMAR o .10 0 o 7
I
ORDER:
Learnedcounsel for the petitionersubmits that the causein this writpetition does not survive any morefor considerationand the writpetition has become infructuous'
iI I
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
)-'--
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 . One CCto Sri Srinivasa Rao lt/ladiraju,Advocate [OPticl 2. rwoccs toGp ror scnoli"etllliil;:'iishE;ritf"r th6 stateof Telansana, tourl
MBC
t 2F...
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1110612021
z?ffi,- <br><br>n,l
irl ?8?t
ll
ORDER
WP(TR).N o.10 of 20'17
% o6
C'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WTHOUT COSTS.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Koppula Shobha
Gampa Ashok
Government of AP
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court