The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 9885 of 2021 and other related petitions as infructuous. The petitioners sought directions to prevent political parties from holding a public meeting on a specific land, alleging violations of the Code of Conduct and fundamental rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K, LAKSHMAN
Between:
WRIT PETITION NO: 9885 0F 2021
AND
12.The District Party president, Telangana Rashtra Samithi party Nalgonda District
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 10 in preventing the Respondents No. 11 and 12 to organize a public meeting with more than one lakh gathering in the land of the petitioners for an extent of Ac.1.16 gt sin sy no 71 situated at Anumula Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional in violation of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of lndian constitution and also in Violation of Appendix Xll of code of conducldos and donts for guidance of candidate and political parties and consequenfly direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 1o to prevent the Respondent Nos.11 and '12 in organizing public meeting on 14.o4.2o10 in the land of the petitioners for an extent of Ac.1.16 gts in Sy,No.71 situaled at Anumula Village and Mandal
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'1 51 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 10 to take appropriate action upon complaint/ representation
dated 10.04.2021 of the petitioners forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition
lA NO: 2 oF 2021
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 10 to prevent the 11th and 12 respondents from organizing the public meeting dated 10.04.201 1 for the on- going By elections of Nagarjuna Sagar constituency in the rand of the petitioners to an extent of Ac 1 ..r 6 gts in sy no 71 situated at Anumula Village and lr/andal, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. RAJINIKANTH REDDy
Counsel for Respondents: SRI N. RAJESHWAR RAO
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
The Court made the f,rllowing: ORDER
THEHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN o .9885of22t TPETITtoNNo
ORDER:
SriTera Rajinikanth ReddY'learned counsel for the petitioners',1'oUIdsubmit that the cause in this writ petitton surviveand the writpetition has become doesno[ infructuous'
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGIST R //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri T RajinikanthReddyAdvocate IOPUC] 2. One CC to Sri NambvarapuRajeswaraRao, Assistant Solicitor General (OPUC) 3. Two CD Copies I,48CN
HIGH COURT
DATED: 26t04t2021
j-1
.rtr 1 .i-A
t
0 3 iiiN 2021
ORDER
WP.No.9885 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTSS
l'/n /
Goli Saidi Reddy and Ap9-ti S^rrnlyaq Reddy
Union of India
The Election Commission of India
The State Election Commissioner, Telangana
The State of Telangana
TRS Party
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
