Disposed

Galipelli Sharada , Gudla Sharada v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Apr 2021WP/9230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of writ petition on compassionate appointment petition by consent, directing respondents to consider pending representations within eight weeks. Adjourned miscellaneous petitions to stand closed.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Galipelli Sharada , Gudla Sharada Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶3

IVIONDAY. THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 9230 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Galipelli Sharada @ Gudla Sharada, W/o Late G. Prem Kumar, D/o Galipelli triladhunaiah, age. 26 years, Un-employee, R/o H.No. 2-49, Lingapur village, Manakondur lvlandal, Karimnagar Dist. at present residing at H.No. 10-3-41 , Shivajinagar, Nizamabad, Nizamabad Dist.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1, The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Prl. Secretary, Agriculture Department Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶13

The District Collector, Kamareddy District.

¶14

The District Agriculture Officer, Kamareddy District

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not^providing employment to the petitioner under compassionate grounds due to the death of her husband, who worked as Junior Assistant in Agriculture Department as illegal, arbitrary, violative of^principles of natural^justice and also violative of Articles 14,21 of the Constitution of India

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith appoint the^petitioner in any^post as^per her eligibility on compassionate grounds by considering her representations dt. 2710112020 and dI. 1411212020, pending disposal of the writ^petition

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.SAJAN KUMAR

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI}

¶23

21 WRIT P ETITION^{N o.9230of2}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This writ^{petilionis beingdisposedof ol the odmission stoge}

¶26

with lhe consent^{of bolh} Porties

¶27

This writ^{pelitionis filed seekingthef ollowingrelief:}

¶28

"..... to'issue^{an order or direction moreparticutartyone in} the nature of^{Writ of Mandamusdectaringthe action of the} respondents^{in not providing emptoyment to the petitioner} under compassionate^{groundsdue to the deathof her} husband, who^{worked as JuniorAssistantin Agricutture} Department^{as ittegat, arbitrary, viotativeof principtes of} natural^{justice and atso viotativeof Artictes '14 and 21 of} the constitution^{of lndia...."} '

¶29

Heord Sri P.Soion^{Kumor, leorned counsel oppeoring for the} peiilioner ond the leorned^{GovernmenlPleoderoppeoringfor the} respondents.

¶30

It hos been^{contendedby the pe'titioner thot her husbond} while working os^{o JuniorAssislontwith the respondentsexpired on} 12.,l0.1990 leoving^{behind her os the sole dependont'She hos} submlited . detoiled^{representotions lothe respondents on} 27.01 .2020 ond^{14.12.2020requesting to consider her cose for} oppointment on^{compossionote grounds' But' so for' the} respondents hove^{not possed ony orders on the soid} re^{presentotions.}

¶31

Therefore, counsel^{for the petiiionerhod coniendedthol} oppropriote^{orders be possed in the writ petilion direclingthe} respondents to^{consider lhe representqtionssubmitledby lhe}

¶32

petitioner on 27.01.2020 ond 14.12.2020 ond^{poss oppropriote} orders in occordonce^{wlth low, wiihin o reosonoble period of time'}

¶33

Leorned Government^{Pleoderoppeoringfor the respondents} hod contended thot since the^{petitioner's representoiions ore} pending with the respondents, the^{respondeniswouldconsider the} some ond oppropriole^{orderswouldbe possed in occordonce} with low.

¶34

This Couri, hoving^{considered ihe rivol submissionsof leorned} counsel for the^{porties,is of ihe consideredview thol this writ} peiilion con be disposed of direcling^{the respondents to consider} the represenlotions^{submitied by the peliiioner on 27'012020 ond} 14.12.2020 ond^{poss opproprloteorders in occordoncewilh low} within o reosonoble^{period, preferobly within o periodof eighl} weeks from ihe dote^{of receiptof o copy of this order'}

¶35

Wiih the obove direclions,^{the writ petitionis disposedof' No}

¶36

order os to costs.

¶37

Pending miscelloneous^{pelitions, if ony, sholl stond closed'}

¶38

SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

The Prl. Secretary, Agriculture Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶43

The District Collector, Kamareddy District.

¶44

The District Agriculture Officer, Kamareddy District

¶45

One CC to Sri P.Sajan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

¶46

Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶47

Two CD Copies

>[--

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210412021

ORDER

WP.No.9230 ot 2021

C S TA 14:
(
1;
,?
Joo 0 z Mnv zl21
':i.

¶55

DISPOSING OF^{THE WRIT PETITION} WITHOUT COSTS.

¶56

( ))
:>

Galipelli Sharada , Gudla Sharada v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Galipelli Sharada , Gudla Sharada v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ifci Limited Vs The Union of India and Another

A.Murali Vs Sri Sunil Sharma I.A.S and another

D. Vijaya Lakshmi Vs State of Telangana and another

Basapally Kranthi Kumar Vs The Director of Medical Education and 3 Others

Modi Shanthi Vs The State of Telangana

B. Ramesh Vs State of Telangana and 3 others