Allowed

Basapally Kranthi Kumar v. The Director of Medical Education and 3 Others

Telangana HC12 Apr 2021WP/1928/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Junior Assistant, sought appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian under Rule 22 of Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules, which the respondents allegedly did not consider. This court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for such appointment.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of directing respondents to consider petitioner's case for appointment by transfer to Librarian under Rule 22 of Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules and pass appropri

Basapally Kranthi Kumar Vs The Director of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.1928 of 2021

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Heard Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶4

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had contended that the petitioner is working as a Junior Assistant and as per the Rule of reservation, the case of the petitioner has to be considered for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian, but the respondents are not considering his case for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian.

¶5

This Court vide order dated 01.02.2021 was pleased to grant interim order directing the respondents not to fill up one post of Librarian and the said interim order is subsisting. As per Rule 22 of Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules, the petitioner is entitled for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian. But, the respondents are not considering his case for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian. Therefore, appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian in accordance with Rule 22 of Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules.

¶6

Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the case of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with Rule 22 of the Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules and

¶7

appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, as per Rules.

¶8

This Court, having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment by transfer to the post of Librarian in accordance with Rule 22 of the Telangana State and Subordinate Services Rules and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, as per Rules.

¶9

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶10

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶11

____________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J

¶12

12.04.2021 Prv

Basapally Kranthi Kumar v. The Director of Medical Education and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basapally Kranthi Kumar v. The Director of Medical Education and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ifci Limited Vs The Union of India and Another

A.Murali Vs Sri Sunil Sharma I.A.S and another

D. Vijaya Lakshmi Vs State of Telangana and another

Modi Shanthi Vs The State of Telangana

B. Ramesh Vs State of Telangana and 3 others

Galipelli Sharada , Gudla Sharada Vs The State of Telangana