Petition under Article 226 o'f \teConstitution of lndia prayingthat ln the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue an order or orders, moreparticularly one in the nature of the writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondentNo.2 in passing an order vide.cr.No. ZiatZOZttCplrcxlDl dated 20.03.2021by conformingthe order passed by the 3rd respondent vide cr.No.81/7B3|2O2Odated 1610112021,without consideringthe fact tnai, tre material carried inthe vehicleof the petitioner does not fall under the purview of section 34 (a) and section 34(e) of theTelangana Excise Act 1968as illegal, arbitrary and against theTelanganaExciseAct 1968 and also as per the rights guJtanteed bythe Constitution of lndia andconsequently declare the orderspassed by the 2nd and 3rd respondentsas baseless and does not fall underthe purview of s-ec 3a(a) and sec 34(e) ofthe Telangana Excise Act1968 and thereforedeclare that the vehicle of thepetitioner bearing No. TS-15-UB-1721seized in c.o.R No. 319 of 2020, dated 0511212020 is nota crime vehicle.