Disposed

Jangili Upender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Oct 2021WP/5998/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing revenue authorities to rectify land entries in Survey No. 646 following their representation dated 31.12.2020. The court held that petitioners must file an application via the Dharani Portal instead.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to make an online application in the Dharani Portal within two weeks; authorities to pass orders expeditiously.

Jangili Upender Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

IVONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 5998 oF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

'1 . Janqili Upender Rao, Sio Late Venkaiah, Aged about 61 years, Occ: Retired Employei, Rl/o Phanigiri Village, Nagaram Mandal,^{SuryapetDistrict.}

¶8

z. .tangili'simmaiah, S/-o Late Dattaial,^{Aged about 65 years, Occ: S.l' ( Retired)} H.No. 1-22-70lB7l2l1lC Near Hvma Gardens^Suryapet,

¶9

Jangili Laxminarayana, S/o Daftaiah,^{Aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture,Rl/o} Phahigiri Village, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet^District.

¶10

Jangili Sattaia-h, S/o-Late Narsaiah,^{Ag'ed about 85 years, Occ: Agriculture,R/o} Phanigiri Village, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet^{District.Teleng"nu..,rar,r,O*=*,}

¶11

AND

¶12

'1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government' Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Collector, Suryapet^District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet^{District.TelanganaState}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High courtmay be pleased} to issue a Writ, order or direction^{particularly a writ of Mandamus,to declare the} action of the Respondents^{1 and 2 in not takingany action upon the Petitioners} representation daled 31312020 is^{illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of} natural^justice and against Articles^{14,16,19,21 and 300 A of the constitution of} lndia and consequently direct the^{respondentsNo.'l and 2 to dispose of the} petitioners representation dt.3l3l2020 forthwith.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶18

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct} the respondents No.1 and^{2 to disposeof the petitioners representation dl.3l3l202o} forthwith.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRl. J. RAGHURAM}

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents:^{GP FOR REVENUE}

¶21

The Court at the stage of^{admissionmade the following:ORDER}

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK RI'DDY

¶23

WRIT PETITION No. 5998 of 2o20

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 2. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents are not disposing of their representation dated O3.03.2020 filed for directing the Tahsildar to consider their petition for rectification of entries with respect to land to an extent of Acs. 1 S. 15 guntas in Survey No. 646 situated at Phanigiri Village, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet District; missing entries with respect to land to an extent of Acs.7.35 guntas out ofAcs.15.15 guntas and direct the revenue authorities to rectify the missing lands in Survey No.646.

¶26

Learned Government Pleader states that if the petitioners make an Application on-line in Dharani Portal, the same will be considered and necessary orders will be passed by the authorities concerned, in accordance with law. 4. Having regard to the above submissions, without going into merits or demerits of the case, the Writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to make an application on-line in Dharani Portal, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such Application/ s being filed, the authorities concerned shall pass necessary orders thereon strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks thereafter, duly putting on notice the parties concerned. No costs.

¶27

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶28

SD./K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcloN AH..*

¶29

To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Dlstrict Collector,^{SuryapetDistrict.}

¶30

S. The Tahsildar, Nagaram^{Mahdal, SuryapetDistrict.TelanganaState}

¶31

4 5 i[s":.3,.i:5J,],H:y:?ft ,1 j,["f s:",,_"[yfrLstareorre,ansanaar o Two CD Coo'ies^' 7 One Spare Copy CHR SJ

T I

HIGH^COURT

DATED:1811012021

ORDER

STAr€
)-
(
loo czN[tq?l
l.
* t) ESP

¶37

W.P.No.5998 of 2020

¶38

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

¶39

I tu,

Jangili Upender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jangili Upender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Venkat Ramulu Vs State of Telangana and 4 Others

Vaddi Venugopal Reddy Vs The State Of Telangana and 6 others

Jangili Sattaiah Vs The State of Telangana And 5 Others

Mr Jangili Upender Rao and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Jangili Sattaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Bernvolu Sarojanamma Vs The State of Telangana and 7 others