Writ petition filed alleging illegal non-disposal of a representation concerning land extent. Disposed at admission stage by directing petitioners to file an online application in the Dharani Portal.
Directing petitioners to make an online application in the Dharani Portal within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdlction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEA. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2955OF 2020
Between:
Z. LjnoiiiSiinnaiah, S7o Latebaitaiai,Age65 years, Obc. Retired Sub-lnspector of - iotiE", Ryo n.ruo.t-z-z7Ol87t2l1lC, Near Hyrira Gardens, Suryapet District' 3. i;;sili Liiminarayana,S/o Latg Dgttaiani ASq QJ .y9?t1occ Agriculture, R/o R/o?anigiri Villagi:,Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet District'T'S'
+. ilnSitisiihalJf,,bloLa"te Narsaiah, Age 78 ye_ars, Oc-c. Agriculture, R/o.H.No.1- i-gsalt tlg, A:V. Enclave,Suryapet, SuryapetDist., T.S. ...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to issue writ, order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the actionof the Respondent No.1and 2 not to initiate any action upon my representation dated25.01.2020 by directingthe Recordingauthority i.e. Respondent No.3 to alter the extentof the land in sy.No.629to an extent of Ac.3.10 gts insteadof Ac.1.13gts out ofthe total extent of landAc.10.04 gts to be shared by the surviving LRs of my late GrandfathernamelyJangili Narsaiah,being my Latefathernamely Jangili venkaiah andmy younger Paternal unclesand his L.Rs i.e. petitionerNo.2 and 3 sons of the LateJangili Dattaiah and petitioner No.4 herein situatedat Phanigiri village, NagaramMandal, suryapetDistrictis illegal, arbitrary, violativeof principles naturaljustice and againstthe Article 14,16, 19, 21 and 300-4 constitution of lndia' IA NO:1 OF 2020
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto directthe respondents 1 and 2to disposeof our representationdated25.01'2020within the stipulatedperiod.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. J' RAGHURAM
Counsel forthe Respondents:GP FORREVENUE
The Court at the stageof admissionmade the following:ORDER
THE HON ELE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY
1VRIT PETITION No. 2955 of2O2O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for thepetitioners andlearned Government Plearler for Revenue for the respondents. Witll their consent, the Wrlt Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
To. '",.1 . Th" principal sec-etary Revenue Department, state of Telanganasecretariat, Hvderabad,T.S,
z fie-o,sriii CollectorSurvyapet District' T S 5. ii'i" i"ri.iroar,r.ragrram Min'dal, Suryap-etDistrict' T S' ;. o"; ctiosri J. Haghuram. Advocate[OPUC] e. i;; 66.io-citoifl;;";";; Hisn co'rtror the Stateor relansana at Hvderabad. [OUT] 6 Tiio CD Copies 7 One SpareCoPY W. ^up
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 811012021
ORDER
W.P.No.2955 o12020
1t\ E STA 16:
(o o^
'+ (s(
<br>oo 2I t|cT21]t1
,.r,,
+ - ,t ,,/
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGH OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS
1
(
I
0 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the non-disposal of a representation regarding land extent correction.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr Jangili Upender Rao and others
The State of Telangana
The District Collector, Suryapet District
The Tahsildar, Nagaram Mandal
A. ABHISHEK REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
