Erelli Navin Kumar v. the State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ under Article 226 against State and SHO for detention pending appearance. No representation appeared; petition closed without costs.
Petitioner sought writ under Article 226 against State and SHO for detention pending appearance. No representation appeared; petition closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECONDDAY OFMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K, LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITI ON NO: 4973 oF 2021
Between:
ERELLI NAVIN KUIVAR, Sio.E.Rama Narsaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Private Employee, Presentlyresidingat Germany,Rep'by his G.P.A^HolderSri Ramnarsaiih s/o.Late Muth-aiah, agedabout 60 years, r/o,H.No.'18-109/1 , Road No, 5, Hanumanpet, I,4alkajgiri, R.R.District,
...pETtIoNER
AND
...REspoNDENTs
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to iSSue an appropriateWrit, orderor Direction, more particularly one in the natureof Writ of Mandamus, to declarethe action of the 2nd respondent in not issuing orders to the 3rd respondent todesistfrom detainingthe petitionerherein at the Shamshabad Airportwho is likelyto visit lndia to make his appearance on 161312021 for his examinationin relation to the c.c.No.62660f 20190n the file of the xlll N/ahila Court, Nampally,Hyderabad, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust'
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto DIRECT the respondentNo.2 hereinto issue orders to the 3rd respondent,not to detainthepetitionerhereinbearingPaSsportB.No.MggT2066atShamshabad Airport lmmigrationPoint, pending disposal of the main WritPetition Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI K. RAVIKANTH
Counsel for Respondents:SRI S. RAM MOHAN,AGP FORHOME
The Court madethe following:ORDER
T}IE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN o 1 WRIT PETITION No.4973 0F
ORDER:
When the matter iscalled for hearing,even today, there is no representationon behalf of the petitioner'
Sri S.Ram Mohan,learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home,on instructions would submit that the petitioner hereinis already appearingin C'C'No'6266of 2019 ' pending on the file ofXIII Mahila Court, Nampaliy' Hyderabad.
Recording the saidsubmission, this Writ Petitionis closed.
MiscellaneousPetitions, pending if any, shall also stand
closed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SriK Ravikanth Advocate [OPUC] ^ i. iffi cCs'iJ CCfor l-tome,High Cou?t for th-eState of Telangana' [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies MBC
*-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2210312021
tl S TA
(
0 7 APB 2021
I
.,..o
I
ORDER
WP.No.49T3 of 2021
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
r.(
V4,
ob<br>.9/
WITHOUT COSTS.
Eralli Navin Kuivar
State of Telangana
Station House Officer
Justice K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court