remand report and in support of the same, he placed reliance on the judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Riasat Ali, Alias Babu Miya v. Unknownl. He would further submit that making of a document or part of a document does not n-rean "writing" or "printing" it, but signing or otherwise executing it; as in legal phrase, "making an indenture" or "rxaking a promissory note" by which is not meant the writing out of the fonn of the instrument, but the sealing or signing it as a deed or note. The lact that the word "makes" is used in the section in conjunction with the words "signs", "seals" or "executes", or rnakes any rnark "denoting the execution, & c" seems to very clearly to denote that this is its true meaning. What constitutes a false document, or parl of a document, is not the writing of any number of words which in thernselves are innocent, but the affixing the seal or signature of some person to the document, or part of a document, knowing that the seal ol signature is nor his, and that he gave no authority to alfix it. In orher rvords, the lalsity consists in the document. or part o1- a document, bein-e. signed or sealed with the name or seal of a person lr.ho did not in fact sign or seal it. Thus, according to the learned counsel lor the petitioners, the contents ofthe remand repoft lacks the ingredients and, therefore, the proceedings against the petitioners herein are liable to be quashed in the above cn nte.
