Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking declaration that the rejection of their application for enhanced student intake was illegal. This later hearing dismissed the petition as infructuous upon counsel's submission that the cause did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 37997 OF 2015
Between:
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ [V]andamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in rejecting the application of the Petitioner college vide impugned Proc. No. SU/KNR/Admissions/2015-161821 dated 1611012015 as confirmed vide the impugned proceedings vide Lr. No. 954/CDC/SU/KNR dated 0511112015 to permit admission of students in terms of the circular dated 13.05.2015 of the 2nd respondent (MPCS), B.Sc (MPCS) Additional Section and B.Sc.(MSCS) courses, all in English medium, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to ratify the such admissions with due affiliation for the said intake to enable the students so admitted to pursue their respective courses of study
WPMP. NO:48880 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 to permit the students admitted under enhanced intake by thepetitioner for the academic year 2015-2016 to continue their study in the respective coursesby duly enrotling the said students in the University in terms ofthe request for enhancement of intake as communicated vide the representationof the petitioner dated 2510712015tn terms of circular dated 06.08.2015 issuedby the 2nd respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. KALYANIGHAYAL
Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 &2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for Respondent No. 3: SRI PRAVEENKUMARVEERJALA
The Court made the following: ORDER
jI i
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.37997 of 2015
ORDER:
Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not sur-,rive and the writ petition has become infiuctuous.
Recording the above subrnission. this u,rir petirion is disrnrssed as infiuctuous. t.,,- o order as to costs.
Pending mtscellaneous peririons, if any. shall stancl closed
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY'
SECTIO OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Smt. Katvani Ghaya.l Advocate tOpUCl ?. 9neCC to Sri pravden Ku;;iVe;rj;6ft'r;ri; topucl i. IWB 3B%,SfI For Hisher eoucaiirin,-nigh-c*it i"i tn" state of retansana. [oUr] MBC
N)r
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010212021
1 $ c s l:4
,(..<o3
23 FEB202l az
rj,.)t }!
rO -!,-
ORDER
WP.No.37997of 2015
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS
Vivekananda Degree & PG College
State of Telangana
Telangana State Council for Higher Education
Satavahana University
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
