Dismissed

M/s Milleto Food Industries v. Bank of Baroda

Telangana HC12 Feb 2021WP/3387/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No. 3387 of 2021 regarding an SARFAESI e-auction. The judgment records the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted, resulting in the petition being dismissed ab initio.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn ab initio.

M/s Milleto Food Industries Vs Bank of Baroda — Banking and Recovery | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶5

WRIT PETITIO N NO: 3387 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

M/s Milleto Food lndustries, Rep. by its partner V. Hari Krishna,^{S/o. V Yadagiri, Aged:} l,/ajor. Occ. Business. R/o.11 -13 395, Plot No.203, Land^{ScapeAppartment'} Vanastalipuram, Hyderabad.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 Bank of Baroda, O/o.^{ZOSAR Branch. 6-1-84113,1st Floor'Khusr-u.Jung House'} 5;;;;i;|-|at R;;b,^{siiianao,Hvderabad,Repbv its Authorized officer}

¶11

2 [,r"r"*rn ilrnOr',ir Reddv, Slo^{6hanna Reddy lVanyam Aged: Major'Occ} ariii,"ir. R/o. H.No.9-i^{23. Laxminagar Colony BoduppalHyderaDao}

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Constitution^{of lndia praying that in the} Petition under^{Article 226 of the} circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleaSedto issue a Writ^{or Directionor an Orderwhichparticularlyin the natureof WRITOF} MANDAN,IUS^{declaringthe action of the respondentbank in pursuance to the} e-auction^{saleproceedings held on 21'11 2020 vide e-auctionsalenoticedated} 02.1l.2ozowhich^{is pubrished in Eenadu TeruguDairyNews Paper under SARFAESI} Act in respect^{of the petition schedule properties 1) Plantand Machineryheld in} sy.No.694/^{A and 750/E, situated at Gangapu(V),Jedcherra(M), MahaboorNagar} District.^{2) All that the rand consistingof shed bearing H.No.10-64' constructedon} open^{land in Sy No 694/ A & 750/E'openland and constructed shed bearing h no 10-} 65 and^{10-66 measuring.10200Sq.ydsand forty feetroad area from main roadat} Gangapu(V)'^{Jadcherla(M)' [r'4ahabubnagarDistrict is illegal' arbitrary' violative of} Article^{14 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent not to} enforce^{the said notice}

¶14

IA NO :1O F²⁰²¹

¶15

umstances^{stated in the} Petition^{underSection 151 CPC prayingthat in the clrc} pleased^{to grantstaYof} affidavit^{filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be} er of ProPerties^{to third} all further^{proceedingsincluding not to alienate and transf} .2020^{which is Published} parties in^{pursuance to the e-auctionsale notice dated 02'11}

¶16

in Eenadu^{TeluguDaily News Paper the auction was held on 21 11 2020 under} SARFAESI^{Act i.e., 1) Plant and tt4achineryheld in Sy No 694/A & 750/E' situated at} Gangapu(V),^{Jedcherla(M),lvlahaboorNagar District' 2) All that the land consisting} of Shed^{bearing H.No.10-64, constructedon open land in Sy.No.694/A & 750/E, open} land and^{constructedshed bearingh'no'10-65 and10-66 measuring 10200 SqYds} andfortyfeetroadareafrommainroadatGangapu(V)'Jadcherla(M)' lr/lahabubnagar^{District at Gangapu(V),Jadcherla(N/)' tr/lahabubnagar District} pending disposal of the^{main WritPetition'}

¶17

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRl. TADAKANTISRIDHAR}

¶18

Counsel for the^{Respondents: SRISRINIVASCHITTURU} The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶19

T .llI.J tl ,\J l8r E s IJ u TI RA HEKERR ED AND r H U t{ 'Bi DR. IIC ES H EEM H R

w.P.NO.33g7 aF 2021

E n

Leorned counser for the petitioner sri Todokonti Sridhor. submiis thol vv':rr he hos instruclions to withdrow lhe writ p eiition erro', ond, therefore, seeks permission for the some.

¶24

Ferrlission occorded ond f he wri.l peiliion is dismissecj crs r,vif 1s1q14,1^ ;i'1r..in" 5.6rg15, if cny, shoJl slcnd voccted

¶25

"i:rr' Jai,.i.\r./ c;;;p rcrtiic,ts i_rerrjir_c. il ..i.r. saOi si:lf :t :-.:.,, t-.r

¶26

: r.:^. i )! ia aa:t'!

¶27

To,

¶28

SD/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcloN [kr.u*

¶29

1 9ne 99^{to Sri TadakantiSridhar} Advocate IOPUCt 2.) 9n" 99^{to Sri Srinivas CnittrrJ} hOuot"ai;'fO,iu;i, . Two CD Copies CHR

HIGH^GOURT

DATED:1^2t021202'l

ORDER

I g STAIE
o,1 ,:
s
J
o 23 tEB 2021
-1
u/.
*

¶35

W.P.No.3387 of²⁰²¹

¶36

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶37

r\9 >>

M/s Milleto Food Industries v. Bank of Baroda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Milleto Food Industries v. Bank of Baroda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Ramson Food Processing Industries Vs Bank of Baroda and Another

M/s. National Theatre Vs State of Telangana and 2 Others

Mr. Kishore Sethuraman and 4 others Vs M/s. Union Bank and 2 others

Sri. Kamasamudram Vinod Vs State Bank of India

Maligi Reddy Kavitha Vs The State of Telangana

Zilla Nagi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana