Writ petition filed by individuals seeking prohibition against bank proceedings was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for alternative remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A, RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 2860 OF 2021
Between:
.) Rio.8-2-2931821A14311A, Road No. 22, Jubitee Hiils, Hvder;bad -'3i AlankritaSoni, D/o.Rajendra- Kumar Soni Age 37 y'ears, Occ.Business, R/o. g_2_ 2931821A1431tA, Road-No. 22. Jubitee Hiils, Hiderabdd - 33.
AND
..RESPONOENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly, in the nature of writ of prohibition, restraining the Respondent No.2 from proceeding with the impugned proceedings RC/510/2020 daled 3011212020 and if necessary also issue a consequential certiorari against the said order includrng the proceedings in oA No. 536 ol 2019 on the file of the Respondent No.3 by declaring them as illegal unjust and without the authority of law
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petitron under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to impugned proceedings Rclslol2o2o dated 3ol12l2o2o, issued by the Respondent No.2 pending the disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI L. RAVI CHANDER, SENIOR COUNSEL
SRI MAYUR MUNDRA
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: Dr. K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
'THE HO N'BLE S RI JT]STICE A.R-{.IAIS HI.]KEIIREI)DY ANI) -THt] HO<sup>.BI-E DR..I I. S1'ICI SH A { E, [:\I i\KTH[,R
\.P.\o.2ti60o F 21t21
Sri t,.Ravi Chander,learned Senior Counsel, appearing tbr the petitioners, after arguingthe casefor some time,and when the court was not inclined to entertainthe writ petition,in all his wisdom' and after insir"uctions fromhis clients, sought permissionto withdraw the writ petition \rth liberty tothe petitionersto avail the alternative remedyofapproaching tht.' Di:bts l(ecoverYTribunal.
Sr i K.LakshmiNarasirnha. le'arned Stanciing Counseltbr the i:spcn<1ent- Bankvehe'tllently t'rpposedthe reliel sought lbr in the $ rit r r ' l.lll
Ir rj,-.rr, o1' theab0r,c sr.tbrnission ol' thc lcal'ncilSclliorL olt;r:L-i .,!i,e ring, tbr the petitionrr'. rvrit petirionis disrilissecins r't'illtilrawrr $ iti' ii'nertt,to Lhe petitioners toavail the alternative rernecliesavailableunder lavi.
Interlocutory applicationspending, if an-v,shall standclosed. No
o|der as t0 costs.
i I
SD/-K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR \ ,TRUECOPY// C-L\
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. one ccto sri Mavury'*€|"lSi;"hTtiJJLlSrrorr"r 2. one CC toDr. K LakshmiN Two CD CoPies
MBC
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1010212021
fl t: S TA 14.
k
2 2 rEB 2021 za
J:
i
rr.!
,.,-.)'4.I c
ORDER
WP.No.2860 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
rt
0
')^)
1
Kishore Sethuraman
Union Bank of India, formerly Andhra Bank
A. Rajasheker Reddy
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
