In this writ petition challenging the exclusion of petitioner colleges from B. Pharmacy counseling, this court dismissed the petition as infructuous after counsel submitted the matter had become so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT P ETITION N O: 29085 oF 2014
Between:
B. Srinivasa Pharmaceutical lnstitute & Centre for Research, Burugupally, Vikarabad lVandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 101 Rep. by its Chairman, V. Srinivasulu,
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an order or direction, one moreparticularly in the nature of writ of lt4andamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not including the intake of the petitioners college in B. Pharmacy programme in the process of counseling notified on 18.09.2014o by the 3rd respondent for allotment of students from Bi.P.C.stream in intermediate course scheduled to commence from 22,09.2O14 as arbitraryand illegal offending Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and issue a consequential direction to the respondents I to 4 to allot students to thepetitioner collegesin respect of the B. Pharmacy course for the intake approved by the 5threspondent WPMP. NO: 36388 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased to directthe 2nd and 3rd respondents to include the intake of thepetitioners in B. Pharmacy
L
programmeaSapprovedbythe5threspondent,intheprocessofwebcounseling notified on 18-09-2014for allotmentof students. Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI. SHREYAS REDDY
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2: SRIV' RAMCHANDERGl)UD,SC FOR JNTU Counsel for the RespondentNos'3 & 4: SRI A. VENKAT L$lMAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRIK. RAMAKANTH REI)DY, SC FOR AICTE The Court made the following: ORDER
IHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRI T PETITION No.29085 of 2014
ORDER:
When the motter is token up for heoring, leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioners hod contended thot the couse in the writ pelilion does not survive for odjudicotion ond hos become infructuous.
Recording the soid submission, the writ petition is dismissed os
infrucluous. No cosls.
Pending miscelloneous peiitions, if ony, sholl slond closed.
i
SD/- R.KARTHIKEYAN
//TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR qo
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 9n" 99to Sri Shreyas Reddy,Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at a J.*g Hyderabad.C9. tg [OUT]9?.19r,Higher Education,High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4 One CC to Sri V. Ramchander Goud, SC FOR JNTU tOpUCl 5 One CC to Sri A. Venkat Laxma Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6 One CC to Sri K. Ramakanth Reddy, SC FOR AtCiE tOpUCl 7 Two CD Copies B One Spare Copy CHR
*--
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610912021
E STA?.
<br>(
-)
,:),J 07 o$2021 t',
-l
ORDER
W.P.No.29085 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS,
tu$.
1O
U
Siddhartha Institute of Pharmacy and others
State of Telangana
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad
The Convenor EALT/CET(Admissions)-2014
The Telangana State Council for Higher Education
The AII India Council for Technical Education
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
