In a contempt case challenging a High Court order regarding pending honorary payments, the petitioner sought directed hearing for claimant respondent. The court adjourned the proceedings, closing miscellaneous petitions, and did not issue a substantive order resolving the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD -
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CAS E NO: 907 OF 2021
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 io 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated. 21 .01 .2021 passed in W.P.No.7925 of 2020.
Between:
Sri. T. Ragu Goud, S/o. Goud, Age 35 years, Occ Ex Sarpanch, R/o.4-1911, Gouds Colony, Galipor Village, Nizamasagar Mandal, District Nizamabad Kamareddy, Telangana.
Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein, to pay honorary payment is pending of Rs 1000/ per month from August 2013 to 2O15 an the (22months) of Rs 22,000/ and pass such other and further order or orders on thin Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the came, as otherwise, I will be put to irreparable loss, grave suffering, great hardship, heavy injury and serious loss.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. A. ALEEM MAJID
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI N. NARENDER REDDY (SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT)
The Court made the following: ORDER
q
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CASE No.907 of 2021
ORDER:
When lhe moller is token up for heoring, Slonding Courrse oppeoring fc)r tlre 4r, respondent hod inforrred 1l-e Courl llrJi lne arj=is r-rr.r jse(l l-)v this Co ,rrt hove been ac_r.rij ir: j iv,t! r-]rcl 1i.e cr.el : ,:1 l,:r r::J,lunt i^;os cotd to the peliliorrar L,i:j1: l)'r. aeer-.1 r :r,, rlc'ctl 3C 08.2::'
A/iscello reous pelilions, if ony, pending. sho I stond closed
SD/. CH. MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
)l--'
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
s. One Spare Copy t,1[/K TP V
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0310912021
ORDER
CC.No.907 o12021
itt6 S ,^.. q (-)
Y
(
q
n l
i I I stP?o?1
4',j: ,/
''/,
r.:".
:-.l=="=s/
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
<br>lA)rl
I
T. Ragu Goud
Dr. A. Sharath
Saiyanna Gamu
M. Parbanna
Srinvas
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
