Writ petition filed against the State and GHMC regarding unauthorized construction was dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner failed to appear.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF NOVETVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 26404 OF 2021
Between:
Laji Ke Praveen Kumar, S/o L. Baji Rao, aged about 50years,.occ.Business, ild 14-2-37, Gosha Mahal, Chandanwadi, BegumBazaar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'oNDENTS
Petition underArticle226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in tnJui-iO-uu]itiieOtnerewitn,the High Court may be pleased to issuean appropriate witloGt or Direction'.more oarticularlvone in the nature of Writof lrilandamus, to d";iu;;ilulnactionof the respondent No 3 herein in taking actionwith regard to tne ir["#'f"anJuniuthorizedconsiruction made by encroaching the existing20' wide t"'o:Tti;"; t"'iltt"'tt'ern side of the petitioner's house constructedin the open p];il;S; Ni; iiqana 145 situatedat Attapur villase' GHMCRajervernagar ci?ti" n}i"Di'tr.itt' inspiie of the writtencomplaint '"rsits, as ueinl--iilegar, arbitrarv, unjust and dt.2Or9t2021foowed by"';;;;";;i u nconstitutionatano conse["u'#rv oir""i"in"-^sro,"".p;nientto removethe illegal and unauthori."Otontt"lii"" "i'oto ensurethe usageof the said passageas usual, andto grant
NO: 1OF2021
circumstancesstated in Petitionunder Section151 CPC praying'that in the maYbe Pleasedto Pass the affidavitfiled in suppoi'ofGpetition.' tfre lr-slr, Coud d takeaPProPriate actlon ordersdirecting tne respondentNo'3 herein to^consider an g disPosalof the matn pursuant tothe written t-o'pf"l"t dt'20/9/2021'pendin Writ Petition. c Counsel o u ns e I f o for ther the P Respond(etiti o n :i ;i$J., .,t it"#ft=rt*, t ALADMI NI sr RArro N A N D ",
i:1""*lr::h""t"1il;,'Nos'2 & 3: SRr PASHA **33tt5'o?"*ta
The Courtmadethe following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
lY!.l_t PettnOr ro.ZO+O f 2O2t
QEPER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing on 25. lO.2O2l, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court directed to list the matter under the caption for dismissal, on 01. ll.2021, Even toda-y, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Sripasham Krishna Reddy, learned Standing counsel takes notice on behalf f the respondents.
In view of the above, trris writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
//'RUE copytt ^rt?lT^r^1Tr#t,SrRiH
ro, secrroruL#en H s h c.ur 4. I wo CD Cooies ip;f,*ffi ffii':eH,#;t[,-,d H:;,,". 5. One Spare Copy s,tl
secrroruL#en
HIGH COURT
DATED:01/11/2021
ORDER
WP,No.26404of 2021
1 !r E s I4
e
J
z
o
15 l{0v2fln o
.L
.tt
* n,:.s T 'c."3 *
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECLITION WITHOUT COSTS
Laji Ke Praveen Kumar
The State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Commissioner
Justice K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
