Dismissed
Chappidi Venkat Reddy v. State of Telangana and 3 others
Telangana HCWP/22450/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 22450 OF 2021
Between:
Chappidi Venkat Reddy, S/o. Chappidi Krishna Reddy, aged about. 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No.31, H.No.49-84214, Leclurers Colony, Hayathnagar, HYderabad'
AND
...pETIT,.NER in wp
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particular Respondent No.3 in passing Speaking Order vide No.1 0699/TPS lZClLBNZl2lz1 , dated 07/09/2021 against the Petitioner in respect of his PIot Nos. B-25lA,(Eastern part) admeasuring 405 sq. yards, and bearing Plot Nos. 8-2518, (Eastern part) admeasuring 485 sq. yards, totalling to 890 Sq.yards in Sy.No.19/A and 19/AA, situated at Hayanathnagar Khalsa Village, Ranga Reddy District under GHMC circle, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of articles 14,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and in violation ofprinciples of naturaljustice and consequently set aside the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto suspend the Speaking Order vide No.'10699/TPSlZCllBNZl2}2l ,dated 0710912021 issued by the respondent no.3pending disposal of the abovewrit petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Chappidi Venkat Reddy, S/o. ChappidiKrishna Reddy, aged about.37 years, Occ. i3usiness, R/o. Pl<it No.31, H.No.49-84214,Lecturers Colony, Hayathnagar, HYderabad ...PETrroNER
AND
s.M ShafaatHussain, aged about 75 years, occ: Advocate (former Additional 6ir.iriio""rof co;;;rcial Eies;ft lo. n. ruo. r 1 -6-839/1, Red Hills, Hyderabad
....ProPosed resPondent
Petition under section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the Highcourt maybe pleasedto allow the petitioner herein tomplead the proposedIespondent as party respondentno.5 io- ti"pr"."ntwrit petiiion i.e., W.P.No.22450 ot 2021 and in lnterlocutorv Applications.
Counsel for thePetitioner: SRI KATIKARAVINDER REDDY counsel for theRespondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URABAN DEVELOPMENT
counsel for theRespondent Nos.2to 4: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKARREDDY' SC FOR GHMC
The Court madethe fo lowing:ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.2 5O of2O21
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioner has addressed a letter dt.27 .1O.2021 to theRegistrar(Judicial)High Court of Judicature at Hyderabadstatingthat the petitionerseeks to withdraw this Writ Petitionto pursue his remedies available under law, with libertyto file a fresh writ petition in the event of non-considerationof his requestby the respondents.
shall stand closed.
SD/- R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0111112021
ORDER
WP.No.22450 of 2021
1E L4
' \9 't:-
a *..
lU .S'
J
ss
o
.}
cl
3 HgIH *
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Chappidi Venkat Reddy
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Zonal Commissioner, L.B. Nagar Zone, GHMC
M/s. Commercial Taxed Gazetted Officers Co.-operative Housing Society Limited
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court