This judgment dismisses a writ petition seeking a direction to initiate action against illegal construction as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S'I so;il,'615,35 lfl3jif,fli Ar HyD ERABAD
FRIDAY, 7HE I ,*o in o r.ii,Hf#fli.t?V?,T-
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT P ETITI ON NO. 26292 0 F 2021
Between:
Bothala Bapuraiu. S/o aggd about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o ',ila,llaiah,. Jogapur Vilase,-chandurtri rr,|inoalinii"i#bii;irA"Eiii,ijl" Tr;;;".;
AND
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly onein thenature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the3rd respondentin non-considering the representation of thepetitioner andnon-initiatingto take necessaryaction against the illegal construction of therespondentNo.4 basing on the representationof the petitioner, is highly, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violationof Principles of Natural Justice violationof Articles14 and 300-A of the constitutionof lndiaand consequently directthe 3rd respondentto considerthe representationof the petitionerandtoinitiatetotakeactionagainsttherespondentNo.4basingonthe representation madeby the petitioner.
IAN :'l OF 2021
Petition underSection15 1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the3rdrespondenttoconsidertherepreSentationofthepetitionerandtoinitiateto takeactionagainsttherespondentNo.4basingontherepresentationmadebythe petitioner pending disposalof the writ petition'
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRIRAPOLU BHASKAR
counsel forthe Respona"nir'f o.i t GP FoR MUNIcIPAL ADMINISTRATIoNAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
counsel forthe Respondent Nos'2 & 3: sRl t.3:#5fl1r[l'#ffi'r,=,
Counsel forthe ResPondent No'4: -
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMI\N
oNNo OF 2027
ORDER:
Learned counselfor the petitioner sought permission of this Court towithdrawthe writ petition with a libertyto file a fiesh petition.
withdrawr.r.
Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shallstandclosed.No
order as to costs.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ -,-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
I One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar,Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP fdr Municipal Administrationand Urban Development,HighCourt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 One CC to Sri N. Praveen Kumar, S.C. forMunicipalities (OPUC)
4 Two CD Copies. One Spare Copy.
l/P
&
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0511112021
ORDER
WP.No.26292 ot2021
1E
ct
,
oE
c H5 H
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
I
Bothala Bapuri
The State of Telangana
Mamidipalli Gopal Reddy
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
