Jashin Bansal, v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the writ petition regarding the petitioner's expulsion and inability to take ISC 2018 examinations as infructuous without costs.
This court dismissed the writ petition regarding the petitioner's expulsion and inability to take ISC 2018 examinations as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEI\4BER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETtTloN NO. 2596 0F 2018
Between:
Jashin Bansal, S/o. Munish Bansal,Aged about17 y ears, lvlinor, Occ. Student Reo. bv its Guardian/mother, Smt.Nidhi Bansal,R/o .5-6-475, Pragathi Nagar, Maihurl Nagar, Nizamabad,NizamabadDistrict. ...PETITIONER
AND
3 fne Cni"i ExLcutive Officerand Founder,AbhyasalnternationalResidential Public School, Toopran,[VIedakDistrict,TelanganaState ...RESpONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directionmore particularly one in the natureof a writ of Mandamus declaring the actionof the 3rd Respondentin expelling/rusticatingthe petitioner herein from the school of the 3rdRespondentwithout allowing the petitioner to attend/appear for the12th standardISC (lndian Secondary certificate) examinations to beginfrom07-02-20.18by issuinga Trans Certificate (TC)dt.08-1 1- 2017. in the middle of theAcademicyearwithout any noticeor opportunity, or calling for an expla nation/inqu iryinto the allegationsas illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional,in violation of Art., 14,'16, 19 of the constitutionof lndia in violationof regulations of lndian secondary certificateExamination 2018, and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent herein topermit the petitioner herein to appear for the 12th standard ISC examinations 2018, scheduledto be held from 07 -02-2018, by issuingHall ticket/admit card to thepetitioner forthwith.
IA NO: 1 0F 2018
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe 3rd Respondent herein toallow/permitthe petitioner herein to appear/attendfor the 12rh standard ISC examination2018 scheduledto be held from 07 -02-2018by issuing Hall ticket/admit card to thepetitionerforth-with pending disposalof the above writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT. B' RACHNA REDDY Counsel for the RespondentNos. 1 & 2: SRI S. JANARDHANGOUD'
S.C. FOR CENTRALGOVERNMENT
Counsel for the ResPondentNo.3: -
The Court made the following:ORDER
]'HE HOYBLE SRI.IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WIiIT l'}E]'lTlON No.2596 of 20l8
oIlt)Ett:
l. L-eamecl counsel tbr the petitioner has infbrmed lhe Cour-t that the ri rit lrctition has becornr' rnliuctuous. I ln r ie*' ol the saicl submission, the wrir pctirion is disrnissed as irlti'uctuous. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e"
\
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Smt. B. Rachna Redd y, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri S. Janardhan Gou d, S.C. for Central Governnrent [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies. 4. One Spare Copy. N/P TP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0110912021
,---'-'_=:l
.ru : iA f€
:;, 27 SEP20a 7
.L
nFST I. T (i. a {..
ORDER
WP.No.2596 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
tAY
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed to proceed given its status
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Jashin Bansal
The Union of India
Council for the Indian School Certificate
Abhyasa International Residential Public School
Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court