The High Court closed the writ petition declaring it disposed of as withdrawn, following a settlement reached by the parties before the Lok Adalat regarding the petitioner's service dispute and reinstatement.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition; matter disposed of as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Urri"ai"fioni ^,
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT P ETITI ONN o. 1 9234 0F 2012
Between:
Md.Yakub Ali, S/o. Ashraf Ali,54 years, Driver, E-301535, ApSRTC Jagtial Depot, Karimnagar District.
AND
...PETITIONER
1 [gOiqnqtltrlanage.r ApSRTC Karimnagar 2 Depot [V]anager, APSRTC Jagtial Dep5t.
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order/direction or any appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proc. No:pA/19(i9)/2011-RM:KR|VR, Dtd.1O-112011 passed by the 2nd respondent herein to the extent of reducing petitioner's pay in a minimum time scale of Grade-ll Driver for the purpose of salary and treating the period from the date of removal to the date of reinstatement as not on duty for all purposes as illegal, unjust, violative of Article 12, 14 & 16 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same directing the respondents herein to extend all the benefits that were denied under the above impugned order.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JITHENDERRAOVEERAMALLA
Counsel for the Respondents:SRIA. RAVIBABU' S.G. FOR TSRTC
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
HON'BLBSRI JUSTICE ABTIINANDKUMAR SIIAVILI wRITPETITIONNo.1 9234 of2012
OIU)ER:
closed. No costs
3 As a sequel, themiscellaneouspetitions pending.if any, shall
stand closed.
To,
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REft}JAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1 One CC to Sri JithenderRaoVeeramalla, Advocate IOPUC] 2 One CC to Sri A. RaviBabu, S.C. for TSRTC [OPUC] J Two CD Copies.
4 One Spare Copy. (Along with a copy of Award) IVP
HIGHCOURT
DATED:01l}gl202'l
ORDER
WP.No.19234of 2012
rrt: 5.rAi€
co 2I sEP2021
3)
,!
CLOSINGTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
/)
qA frt
/U
BEFORE THE tOK ADATAT
HETD AT HYDERABAD
[Orgonized by High Court Legol Services gommiltee High Courl for lhe Slote of Telongono (Through Video Conference mode)
under section'19 of the legor Services Authoriries Act, t9B7 (centror Act)!
W.P.No. 19234 ot 2Ot2
(Agoinsilhe order o.,,.otii^f::'":l;l;;,iiix::i',, oo,.o ro-r r-2oi r)
Petitioner t. Md. Yokub Ali, S/o.Ashrof Ali, 54 yeors, Driver, E-301535, ApSRIC, Jogtiol Depot, Korimnogor District. Respondents t. The Regionol Monoger, ApSRTC, Korimngor. 2. The Depoi Monoger, APSRTC, Jotiql Depot.
[No.of proceedings of the High Couri Legol Services Commiiiee;
ORDER ROC.No. I 28 I /HC LSC / 2A21, Dat ed 07 -07 -20211
:: Present ::
Nome of Choirmon
Nome of Members
Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Nqveen Roo, Judge, High Court for the Stole of Telongono. (l ) Dr.J.V'rjoyo Lokshmi, Advocote. High Court for the Stqle of Telongono (2) Sri Mettu Goverdhon Reddy, Advocole, High Court for the Stote of Telongono.
AWARD
The dispute . between the porties hoving been refened for determinotion of the LOK ADALAT ond theporties hoving compromised the cose / motter, the following Aword ispossed in terms ofthe setilemeni:
The Employee/Pe titioner - Sri Md.Yqkub oli, hosrepresented olong with his counsel before the virtuol Lok Adolot by ottendingin the office of Secretory, High CourtL egol Services Committee,High Court for the Stote of Telongono ondhe h os produced copy of hi Aodhoor Cordin proof of his identlficqtion. .i\ w
i :'. -,,.. ' i;f I 1 ,.;
The Petitioner-APSRTC(Now)TSRTC representedby Sri R'Shivo Kumor,Low Officerfor TSRTC'hos representedbefore the virtuol Lok Adolotby ottending in the office of Secretory, High courtLegol Services Commlttee,High Couri for the Stote of Telongono'
The Petitionerinitiollyhos preferred Appeol beforethe Dy'CTM' Korimnogorogoinsthis removol from serviceond the some wos reiected by Proc.PA/l9(148)/2Ol1-Dy'CTM-KR' dotedl 3-8-2021holding thot the oppeolwos iime boned' Agoinst which' the petitioner hos prefened reviewbeforethe ReglonolMonoger' APSRTC' Korimnogor'ond the some wosqllowedin port vide Prc'No:PAt19l19ll2O11-RM:KR'doted l0-11-2011 whereunder the removolorder wos sefoside ond possed to the extent of fixinghis poy in minimum time scqle of Grode-ll Drlver for the purpose of solory ondtreotingthe period from the dote of removol to the dote ol reinstotementos not on duiyfor oll purposes'
Aggrievedby the soid order' the Petitionerhos prefened Writ Petitionvide W.P.No' 19234 o12012before the Hon'ble High Court'
During thependency of the WritPetitionboth the porties omicobly resolved thedispute. The Petitioner decided to withdrow the Writ Petition os he wosreinstotedinto service. Accordingly, the Petitioneris permitted 1o withdrowthe Wrii Petition.
ln view of theoboverepresentotlonmode by the Petitioner'the Writ Petition No.1?324of 2012, stonds disposed of os withdrown'
Theporties oreinformed thot the court fee, if ony, poid by ony of them sholl be refunded'
No orders os tothe cosis of oPPeol. C.\ -l . .. .- '.. .- ' .":.. v)-
Md. Yakub Ali
APSRTC (responding), Karimnagar
APSRTC, Jagtial Depot
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
