The High Court at Hyderabad, on Writ Petition No. 24810 of 2013, addressed a petition challenging a fee fixation order. The court recorded a submission that the dispute had become infructuous and consequently dismissed the petition without costs.
No costs awarded. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRDDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITI N NO: 24810 oF201
Between:
KLR Pharmacy College,,Behind ContractorsColony'PolonchaKhammam District' H;p. t;Ti;'i;rrivrr,lJ,iinerinJst.Professor) V Ram'anaravanaReddv ...pErroNER
AND
...RES,.NDENTS
Petition under Article226 ol the Constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfitedtherewith,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto issue a writ, orderor direction,one more particularlyin the nature of writ of mandamus declaringG.o,tr/s.No.62dtls.T.2ol3issuedbythelstrespondentnotifyingafeeof Rs. 68,600/-per studentper annum in respect of Pharma D course imparted by the petitionerasarbitraryandillegaloffendingArticlel4oftheConstitutionoflndiaand issueaconsequentialdirectiontotherespondentstofixandnotifythefeeofRs. 1,80,390/.perstudentperannumforPharmaDcourseinrespectofthepetitioner institutionassoughtinitsrepresentation,fortheblockperiod20l3-141o2015.2016.
WPMP. NO: 30585OF 20132013
WPMP. NO: 30585OF 20132013 petition under sect'=ion 151 cpcprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent topermit the petitioner to collecta fee of Rs l '80'390/-per studentper annum forPharma D Course, as proposed by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent,with a direction tothe respondentNo '1 to notify the same in respect ofthe petitioner institution.
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRIANDAPALLI SANJEEV KUMAR
Counsel forRespondent No. 1:GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel forRespondent No' 2: SRI C' SUDESH ANAND
Counsel forRespondent Nos'3 & 4: SRIA' VENKAT LAXMA REDDY
The Court madethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
W.P.No.248l0 of 2013
OItDIR:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits thar the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as
infiuctuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stanrl closed.
-*----_E-
SD/.T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// l/'' To, SECTION OFFICER i' iii EE J",":3 tE3? ?.iU;:i ?s::#Hiqfl fl,3:i," ro p u thec or reransana. [oUr] 3. 9;; gci i si'cl 5ll.-rn.nnanol;il.li" t6EtlJir venrat raima-H#;, H":;ie (opuc)';tate f ?,lS 33 t"":,,:l 6. One Spare ioov MBC+-
HIGHCOURT -''
DAIED:03/08/2021
1t
-t
4 * f
s$
t- o
*s
i:) ..i
H Ct\l I
ORDER
'WP.ltlo. 24810 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WITIT PETITION,AS
INFRUCTUOUS, VVITHOUT COSTS,
a1Y,. ,r^#
IE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition remains maintainable given that the subject matter has become infructuous.
Whether the court should declare the notified fee arbitrary and illegal under Article 14 of the Constitution.
KLR Pharmacy College
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Admission & fee n...'g' et',ttters Rdlatinoto Fee Fixation...
ix;i.Piti;;";;;;;ir;<sup>HIghJi id'ciiion,saitauao'Hvderabad'
ix: Friend/ CET 2013...
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
