Disposed

Avula Kanakaiah v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Telangana HC21 Oct 2021WP/22933/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of a writ petition seeking direction to enter a petitioner's name in revenue records. The High Court did not examine merits but directed the petitioner to apply online via the Dharani portal, with the authority to decide within eight weeks. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to apply through Dharani portal within two weeks; concerned authority to pass orders within eight weeks no costs

Avula Kanakaiah Vs State of Telangana and 2 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURTFOR THE

¶2

,:;"",it*iflf#J.;r-TE,LANGANA

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY F ocro B E R rw o inb u'dir.i j I l'Sii,?ftIyo

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

Between:

¶7

WRIT PETI TION NO: 22 9330F 2021

¶8

fli1lsff li{e;L,tr.ig E*sffi "#l"si ;tflEl,#;r 6i nr::

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

1 . STATE OF TELANGANA I 3 inrst.fi s'srl;ili,*n!#$:,ffiq;,ff i,,:;.,

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

. Petition under Articte Llp 9t \e Constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit rir"o r-n"ri?i,i, rhe High court may be preased to issue writ order or direction. r";;-p;;;;i;li, onu in the narure of writ of mandamus decrarino the. in aciio;-; ih"'3;f ;:spondent in imprementino the Proceedings at.ZllOitzolo passed in p...rrf"slOil)tzOzO anaentering the naire of the petitioner in the revenue. records as againsi rJnd bearing sy.No.537/8 extent Ac 1 15 gts situated at, Kothakond;-;ffi;,' Sheemadevaraparv Mandar, of earstwhile Karimnaoar o,.I,:-t !i"_r"Tt w"rl"briurnrn District and issuinq new digitalized patta pass books in respect of the sarie as. iregar, arbitrary and co-ntrary to law and consequenilv dire-cr the ;;";;#lil.i n"r"in to forthwith imprement dt.27to,2ozo passJ-in"plo" r.to.etozs t2o2o in,".p".i ot th" ff";?.".:O,"gs

¶14

IA NO: 10 F 2021

¶15

Petition under Section.l s1 cpc praying that In the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, in""rL'gh court may be preased to direct the 3rd respondent herein^to^ forthwith imptemeni tne proceedings dt.27 10612020, passed in Proc.No.8/675 r2o2o and enter petitioners name in the revenue records as a.gainst land bearing survey No. 537/8 extent Ac 1.15 gts situated at Kothakonda Village, Bheemadevarapaily rr,4andar, of erstwhire Karimnagir olti"i,-pi"rL"trv warangal Urban District and issue digitarized pattalar pass bJoks, pending'aisposat of the above Writ petition.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M. p. KASHYAP Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶17

The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER

¶18

THE^{HON'BLESRIJUSTICEA'ABHISHEKREDDY} WRIT^{PETITIONNo. 22933of2021}

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

Heardthelearnedcounselforthepetitionerandthe[earned Government^{Pteader for Revenue for the respondents'With their} consent,^{the Writ Petitionis disposed of at the admissionstage'}

¶21

This writ^{petitionis fited seekinga directionto the respondent} No,3 to^{imptementthe proceedings dated27'06'7070 and enter the} name of the^{petitionerin the Revenue Records in respect of he subject} tand situated^{atKothakondaVittage, BheemdevarapattyMandat'} erstwhite^{Karimnagar District,presentty Warangal Urban District'}

¶22

LearnedGovernmentPleaderstatesthatjfthepetitionermakes an AppUcation^{through online in Dharani Portat, the same wi[[ be} consjdered and^{necessary orderswitl be passed by the authorities'1n} accordance with Iaw.

¶23

Having regard to the^{above made submission and the grievance} exposed by the^{petitioner in the presentwrit petition, without gorng} into the merits or demerits^{of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of} directing the^petitioner to make^{an apptication through online in Dharani} Portat ventitating his^{grievance, within a period of twoweeksfromthe} date of receipt of a copy of this order.^{On such appticationbeing fited,} the concerned authority shatl^pass necessary orders^{thereon,strictlyin} accordance with [aw, as expeditiousty as^{possible, preferably, withina} period of eight weeks thereof, duty putting all the interested parties on notice.

¶24

The misceltaneous petjtions pending, if any, sha[[ stand ctosed. There shatl be no order as to costs.

¶25

SD/- T.TIRUMALA^DEVI ASSISTANT^REGIST R

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

1 The Principal^{Secretary, Revenue Department'State of Telangana' Secretariat'} Hyderabad.

¶30

To,

¶31

2. J. 4. 5. 6. 7.	TheDistrict Collector, WarangalUrban District. IneIatrsildar, BheemadevarpalleMandal,Warangal UrbanDistrict. OneCCto SriM. P. Kashyap,AdvocatetOpUCt"- TwoCCstoGPforRevenud,HighCourtiorthe'StateofTelangana at Hyderabad.[OUT] TwoCDCopies One SpareCopy
sm n

HIGH COURT

DATED:2'll1ol2o21

ORDER

WP.No.22933 ol²⁰²¹

lJt
t-,<br>i
/:,o I
IU 2$ osl?s?l
Q,=5 j, r'/

¶38

DISPOSING OF THE^WP AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

¶39

C><br>

Avula Kanakaiah v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avula Kanakaiah v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thota Srinivas Reddy Vs The Mandal Surveyor

Sarella William Peter Vs The State of Telangana

Bandla Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Maddhi Divakar Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Gunna Bheemaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Sri P. Madhav Yadav Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others