The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging money laundering proceedings ordered by the trial court as infructuous due to changes in the procedural status.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; disposed of as not pressed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S] AT HYDE#JEDOFTELANGANA (special Original Jurisaiction)
FlglY_ THE FTFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTi ONL''
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF r H E H o N, B; ; ;$BJ ::n':'tr Jfl." "-
Between: WRIT PETITI ON NO: 1378 0F 2020
I- i.3?lil, B H I"R :1, ::,:xj:,:,?X":,X;3; : sla, TsS t if ?:,g,t;,?,": Ss,.u
.). Joint Director, Directorate ot ririorc"riini,'Hy#;;ii;i>"nar office 3rd Froor, Shakar Bhawan Basheerbagh, nvOeriUjci.
5 Assistant Director, Directorate of Eriforcerient, couernment of India. I,4inistrv of Finance Deoartment of Revenue, 3rd Floor, Snat<ar ghawanE;;;;;rb;d;,''-' Hyderabad - SOO OO+
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to lssue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of IVandamus
IA NO:1 oF2020
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtostayall furtherproceedings in the aforesaid ECIR; Provisionalattachment order No' 0312017 Dated 28.03.2017;Original Compliant No 747 of 2017 dated 18 04 2017pending before respondentNo. 4 at Delhi;proceedingin OA no 33212019filed by the Respondentno.5undersectionlT(4)ofthePreventionoftr/oneyLaunderingAct 2O02pendingbeforetheAdjudicatoryAuthority,PreventionofMoneylaunderingact 2OO2,astheentireproceedingsarenullandvoidinitiohitbymaxim; Debilefundamentumfallitonus:, meaningthereby that whenthe foundationfalls, everything falls, and,'Subtatofundamentocaditopus", meaning thereby,in case a foundation is removed, thesuperstructure falls
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRIA. CHA'NDRA SHAKER
Counsel for RespondentNos. 1 to 4: SRI N. RAJESHWARRAO ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI P. DEVENDER
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CIIIEFJUST KOHLI
ANID
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CEB . VIJA YSEN RED DY
WRIT PETITION No.l378 of 2020
ORDER: (per the Hon,bte rhe Chief Justice }Iima Kohli)
l. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
present petition on the ground that the same has been rendered infructuous.
disposed of as not pressed along with the pending applications, if any.
\
ASSISTiRfTXEHIilTH ,TRUE CoPY/t (iP
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri A Chandra Shaker Advocate [OpUC] 2.a 9n" 9n" 99 99to Sri P, to Sri Namavarapu Rajeswara Devender,Advocate (OPUC)Rao,-Assistint Solicitor General (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies [/BC
,
HIGHCOURT.,
DATED:0510212021
1rE sr4 14:
r
2
g 1g FEB 2021
-r.
* *
,$trr.7
L-
ORDER
WP.No.1378 of 2020
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT PRESSED, WITHOUT COSTS
z\ ?
S. Bharani
Union of India and Others
Kohli
Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
