Disposed

Sri Mohan Rao Patel v. State of Telangana and 2 others

Telangana HC22 Feb 2021WP/2071/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Writ Petition and a stay application filed by Mohan Rao Patel challenging revocation orders by the Bhainsa Municipality commissioner. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the current petition with liberty to include subsequent developments in a pending writ petition. No substantive ruling on merits was made in this order.

What did the court decide?

Allowed withdrawal of the present writ petition and stay application with liberty to bring subsequent developments on record in the pending related petition.

Sri Mohan Rao Patel Vs State of Telangana and 2… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2071 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri Mohan Ra_o Patel, S/o.Sri Gopal Rao Patel, Age. 57 years, Occ. Business Ryo 1-554, Bhainsa Ginning and Pressing Factory Kubeer Road, Bhainsa Town and Mandal Nirmal District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary (MA and UD) BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad

¶11

The Commissioner, Bhainsa lvlunicipality Nirmal District

¶12

The District Collector and Magistrate, Nirmal District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ Mandamus. (a)Declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing orders of revocation vide Notice bearing No. 0679/BHAll0o01l2O20, 113218HA11000512020 and 1137/8HA11000612020, Dated 23-11-2020 as bad, arbitrary, illegal, unJust, mechanical and opposed to princrples of natural justice and contrary to Articles 14, 16 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia. (b)And set aside the lmpugned Notice 0679/8HAI/000112020, 1132/BHAI/000512020 and 1137/BHAI/000612020, issued by the Respondent No.2 and (c) Consequentially declare the provisions under Section 174 (4) (10) of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 as ultra-vires of Article 14,'16 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings issued by the Respondent No.2 in Procd. Nos. 0679/8HAI/000112020, 1132lBHAI/000512020 and 1137/BHAI/000612020, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition for further orders in the writ petition.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. ANURAG

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 3: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR,

¶20

S.C. FOR MUNICIPALITIES

¶21

The Court made the following: OROER

¶22

¶23

THE H ON'B LET^{TIE C} Hlllf JU STIC EHI MAKoHLI .\ l) \ Rt: DDY -il1l: Hoi(' tlL E SRI^{J L SI'I} CEB.\I.I .{\ SE

¶24

wli.lT PETI 'l'ro\ No.207 I of 2021

¶25

ORDEIi:^{(Per the l{on'blerhe Chiel Justicr: tlinr'r Kohli)}

¶26

Leamed^{counsel for the petitionerseeksleave to withdrawthe} present^{petition whilereserving the right of the petitionerto approach} theleamedSingleJudgeinapendingwdtpetitionfiledbyhim, registered^{as W.P'No'21832 of 2020' by movingan appropriate} application^{to bring on recordthe subsequentdevelopmentsincluding} theactionoftherespondentsolproposingtoderrrolishthe constr.Llction^{raiseclon the sub.]ect rand. He statesthat the nextdate} tlred in^{thc caprioned *'rit petitionis 05 0i l0l I}

¶27

Z. In^{view of the submission made hereinabove'the present} pelitiorl^{is crisposed of arong with the pending applications, wirh}

¶28

liberty^{grantedto leamedcor"tnseltbr the petitionerrecorded above'} SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI //rRUE coPY//^{Assl5iit?ii9.*} SECTION^OFFTCER

¶29

to'', one CC to^{Sri R' Anurag' AdvocateIOP|C],}

¶30

li,rr!!it-tt:1{;55i'-,;1#I$lx{Iiffl 3. One CC^{to Sri N' Prz} ",;Hff^{:"#"n'iHshc'u^}

¶31

1. Two CD^CoPies'

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210212021

ORDER

WP.No.2071 ot 2021

1 tt E IA
,(
o r0 2 ffin 2c21
.4
* *.

¶38

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶39

1<br>t

Sri Mohan Rao Patel v. State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Mohan Rao Patel v. State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Rangoli Eps Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Jagdamba Poly Pack Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

M/s. Lakshmi Packaging Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

R.Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Vojjela Vishnuvardhan, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others Vs Smt. Chukka Padmavathi, Hyd and 4 Others

Ahmed Pan Material and General Stores Vs The State of Telangana