Allowed

Vojjela Vishnuvardhan, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others v. Smt. Chukka Padmavathi, Hyd and 4 Others

Telangana HC22 Feb 2021WA/962/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bench allowed the appellants to withdraw Writ Appeal No. 962 of 2017 with reservation of right to pursue civil remedies against the GP holder and the original owner of the properties. The pending appeal was disposed of without costs.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ appeal with reservation of right to seek civil remedies later.

Vojjela Vishnuvardhan, Nizamabad Dist and 5… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE S] TELANGANA AT HYD E JfJiDOF

¶2

A/ONDAY, THE_TWENTY SECgND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWo THoUSAND AND rwe r.riior.r-e"'."^.

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF rH E H o N, ; "-,^{l, +['J I:nT:i ffil} WRIT APP EAL N O: 962 oF 2017

¶5

writ Appear under crause 15 0f the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 24.04.2012 passed in Wp No. 21741t2010 on the file of the High Court.

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 . Vojjela Vishnuvardhan Flo, _V Suresh Kumar, aged about 25 years, Occupation: Rl:jfl:lrfl"^{H.No.5-o-als,oppi"i;"rufi'bvandrriA,o,.to,.i,iil,",x"nliJ5*"0i,}

¶8

2' G' Eashwaraiah,, S/o.- Venkaiah, aged about 61 years, occupation: Retired Emptovee, R/o. H.No.13-6-qqaix', (o-nir"titiJilrL, cii,ii"brr,"rp"r,ilfi,i5niip"'il"r, Hyderabad.

¶9

Syed Abdul Faiz,, S/o. S-.A. Rahman, aged about 58 years, Occupation: Civil contractor, Fvo. H.No.s-oze, nanmalnhag:;. A.iLo"a, ("ra;;m rih;6r,i'bi.tri"t

¶10

.^{(formerly Aditabad District).}

¶11

4 Syed Abdul Kaleem,, Sio.. Syed .Abdur Rahman, aged about 48 vears, R/o. Kavramarri viraoe and Ir,4and2r, Asifabad, komal.ani-ahJJ,i-'oi.iridi ji3'r,.n"ay Aditabad Districti

¶12

1. s. Vijay Kumar,, S/o. S. Raja Goud, aged about 40 years, occuoailon: 'private

¶13

^^{lmployee R/o. House No 5-1i-395, vi:tta"mmaqutti,tti=rr"OjOU;ii""i."'} 'private 6. Dr. chinlhala!anr Srikanth.. S/o. c. lMadhusudh"in Reddy, aqeo about a6 vears. R/o. House No.20, GLR Encrave,^pipe Line Road, Jeedihietia viag" o,1il.,,urirrpu,. [,4andal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

.AP P E LLAN TS/TH IR D PARTIES (PROPOSED APPELLANTS)

¶15

AND

¶16

1 Smt. Chukka Padmavathi, W/o. Balraj Goud, aged about 50 years, R/o. 8-64, Durgabai Deshmukh Colony, Hyderabad.

¶17

PErlrloNER

¶18

2 The sub-Registrar, eutbullapur, Ranga Reddv Distriii.,R-ESPoNDENTM/RIT 3 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 4 The Joint Director (ClU & SES) Anti-Corruption Bureau, M.J. Ir/arket, Hyderabad. E Tumukunta Satyavathi,, W/o. l\rlaheswar, Fl/o. H.No.10-'155, Ground Flo6r, lr/eenakshi Estates, Jeedimetla Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶19

(R.5 herein is impleaded as per Court order dated 15.3.2011 in WPI/P No. 42251 of 2o1o)

¶20

...RESP.NDENr.

¶21

WAMP. NO: 1871 OF 2017

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the sth respondent herein not to dispossess the petitioners from the respective commercial space that was sold out to them in Baba complex, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶23

LA. NO: 4OF 2O1 7 MP. NO: 1874OF 20171

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1872 days in filing the Writ Appeal the order in W.P.No.21741 of 2010, dated 24.O4.2012, in the interest of justice

¶25

,WAMP. NO: 2128 oF 2017:

¶26

Between

¶27

¶28

Tumukunta Satyavathi,,^{W/o. Nrlaheswar,} -R/o^{H'No 10-155' Ground Floor' lr4eenakshi} i;Ut";, ;;^{iri"ti j vlras" ortr,,iri p" t/anda l RansaReddv.FDJ?1liJ*.,=rro*} 0.*AND

¶29

1 Voiiela Vishnuvardhan,^{S/o. V Suresh Kumar,} lged .^{about25 years'Occupation:} ii,li',,,?,t"' nv".^'ii.N6,s-o a1s.^{dpp, - to Huii,' danor'i Auditorium'Khaleelwadi'} Nizamabad.

¶30

2 dltrsr,Gtairh,,^{S/o. Venkaiah, aged about 61} 1ears, ,,Occupation:,^Retired Employee, Fl/o.^H. No.13-6^{-446131,Konijeti Enclave, GudimalKapur' Menolpatnam,} Hvderabad.

¶31

3 Sved Abdul Faiz,, S/o. S.A. Rahman,^{aged about 58 years,Occupation:Civil} C-ontractor, Rl/o. H.No.3-628, Rahmathnagar,^{Asifabad, KomaramBheemDistrict} (formerly Adilabad District).

¶32

4 Syed Abdul Kaleem,, S/o. Syed Abdul Rahman, aged about 48^years, R/o. Kayramarri village and Mandal, Asifabad, Komaram Bheem District (formerly Adilabad District).

¶33

S. Vijay Kumar,, S/o. S. Raja Goud, aged about 40 years, Occupation: Private Employee, Fl/o. House No. 5-'1 1 -395, Yellammagutta, Nizamabad O,t,.llR,irro"oa*r,

¶34

6 Smt. chukka Padmavathi, w/o. Batraj Goud, aged ubort 50 fJu?5o&Eo APPELLANTS) Durgabai Deshmukh Colony, Hyderabad.

¶35

PETITIoNER

¶36

7 The sub-Registrar, eutbullapur, Ranga neddv Districi.'.R-ESPoNDENT/wRlr The District do I tector, Ra n_gi ReOO v djtirici ia tOika pio r, H yd era bad.

¶37

BI The Joint Director (ClU & SES), Anii-Corruption Bureau, Ir/.j. Market, Hyderabad.

¶38

..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶39

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased receive the additional material papers (1) Doc,No.1 1s34t2o1o dated 29-11-2010, (2) Surrender Lease Deed vide Do.No.52 2312 oil dated 03-06-20i ,1, (3) copy of Lease Deed Doc.No 522412011, dated 03-06-2011 in WA.No.962 of 2O1t

¶40

Counsel for the Appeltants: M/s. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES

¶41

Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI B. V. RAMA RAO

¶42

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶43

Counsel for Respondent No. 4: SRI V. RAVI KIRAN RAO

¶44

Counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI VIJAY B. PAROPAKARI

¶45

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶46

¶47

Item No.60

¶48

THE HON'BLE THE C}IIEFJ US TICE HIMA KOHLI AND TH EHON ,B LE SRI JI,STIC E B, VIJAYSE N DDY

¶49

I,A. No.4 of2017 IN/AND w.A.No .962 of2 017

¶50

JUD GMENT : (Per the Hon, hlc the Chief Justicc Hima Kohli.l

¶51

Leamed counsel for the appellants states that instead of pressing the present appeal, he may be permitted to withdraw the same while reserving the right of his clients to seek appropriate civil remedies against the GpA holder, who has purportedly executed sale deeds in respect of the subject built up properties as also against the respondent No.5, who is the original owner thereof.

¶52

Leave, as prayed fot., is granted. The present appeal is disposed ol alongwl rhrhe pendi ng applications il any.

¶53

¶54

//TRUE COPY//

¶55

sD/-K.sRrNrvASA RAd JOINT REGISTRAR

it'-----

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to M/s. Bharadwaj Associates Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶60

One CC to Sri B. V. Rama Rao, Advocate (OPUC)

¶61

One CC to Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri Vijay B. Paropakari, Advocate (OPUC)

¶62

Two CD Copies

MBC

A^:/

HIGH^COURf

DATED:^2210212021

i;ii
s7A
1
(l z
r,) 2 6 FEB 2021 a
*
r.9

¶68

JUDGMENT

¶69

WA.No.962 of 2017

¶70

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL

¶71

WITHOUT COSTS

¶72

qsV .
Ac-P'4.
2vx,{"*r

Vojjela Vishnuvardhan, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others v. Smt. Chukka Padmavathi, Hyd and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vojjela Vishnuvardhan, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others v. Smt. Chukka Padmavathi, Hyd and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Rangoli Eps Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Jagdamba Poly Pack Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

M/s. Lakshmi Packaging Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

R.Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri Mohan Rao Patel Vs State of Telangana and 2 others

Ahmed Pan Material and General Stores Vs The State of Telangana