Disposed

Bonala Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Sept 2021WP/20657/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by unemployed displaced persons seeking employment under G.O.M. No. 98. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representations and documents and take an expeditious decision.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to approach concerned authority with representations and documents; Respondents to consider claims expeditiously.

Bonala Ravinder Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} (Special Original Jurisdic,tion)

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE^{FIRST DAYOF SEPTEI/BER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEB.VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶5

W T PETI NNO 763 770 20 206 &20 70F20 1

¶6

WP NO: 2076 30^{F 2021}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Pattem Aniaiah, S/o. Chokkaiah,^{Age.46 years,} -occ,^{Unemployee,H.no.9-4,} v;iich;la Villrg6, Villrg6,^{Ramadugutr/andal,Karimnagar District'}

¶9

v;iich;la Villrg6, Villrg6,^{Ramadugutr/andal,Karimnagar District'}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana,^{Rep by Principal Secretary' Revenue Department'} Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

¶14

¶15

The District Collector^{of Karimnagar, Karimnagar District'}

¶16

The Revenue Divisional^{Officer, Karimnagar' Karimnagar District'}

¶17

4 The Chief Engineer-cum-Administrative,^{Sriramsagar Prolect'L M D colony'} Karimnagar District.

¶18

5 The Superintendent^{Engineer,G V.C - 4, L N/ D colony' KarimnagarDistrict}

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under^{Article 226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} cirCUmstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe-pleased to issue a writ^{or order oi direction,more preferably one in the natureof Writ of} tr,,trnOu*rr, declaring^{the actions of the respondentsin not appointingthe petitioner} in any^{post pursuant to G.O.tr,4no.98 Dt 15-04-1986' whereinthe government} pr..,jO'oJ"it to^{provideS0percent employmentto the unemployeddisplaced} ;ill;g;;., due to the^{submergenceof lands and dwellings under Lower ManairDam'} S;i;;;;g;|. Project^{as illegil,arbitrary, violativeof} -principles^{of Natural Justiceand} also violalive of Articles^{14' 21 of the Constitution of lndia'}

¶21

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRl. ANNNAMPELLIGANGADHAR}

¶22

Counsel forthe^{Respondents: GP FORSERVICESI}

¶23

WP NO: 20770 OF²⁰²¹

¶24

Betwee n:

¶25

Kaluva Nagaraju,^{S/o Yellaiah Age27. years,Occ Unemp} loyee, Rl/o H.No o-e6iilr, in'immabur^{Village Thimm6purtvldndal, KarimnagarD} istrict.

¶26

...PETITIONER

¶27

AND

¶28

1 The State of Telangana,^{Rep, by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department'} Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶29

2 The District Collector^{of Karimnagar, Karimnagar District'}

¶30

¶31

The Revenue Divisional^{Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District'}

¶32

4 The Chief Engineer-cum-Administrative'^{Sriramsagar Project'L M D colony'} Karimnagar District.

¶33

The Superintendent Engineer, G,V.C - 4, L.lU.D colony, Kerimnagar District.

¶34

...RESPONDENTS

¶35

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndiil praying that.in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High cc urt may^"ne iieaseo^to issue a writ or order or direction, more preferabry one in ,he na[ure of writ of lvandamus, declaring the actions of the respondenti in not appointinj tre-p"iiiionu,. in any post pursuant to G,o.M no. 98 Dt 1sro4r1g}6, wherein ir" gou"in;L.t fasseo orders to provide S0percent emproyment to the unemproyed dispLced vittageis, oue to the submergence of rands and dwelings under Lowei Manalr Dam, Sriiamsagar Project as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of Natural Justice and also violative of Articles 14,21 of the Constitution of lndia

¶36

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. ANNNAMpELLI GANGADHAR

¶37

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES I

¶38

WP NO: 20764 oF 2021

¶39

Between:

¶40

fl5onfl#:3?iL",11us,.,8ffi[ah,^{Age 4'1 years, occ Uneml,royee, R/o H.no 3-13,}

¶41

.,.PETITIONER

¶42

AND

¶43

The State of Telanoana. Rep. by principal Secretary, Reve,ue Department, Secretariat, Hyderaiad.

¶44

z The District Collector of Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶45

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar D strict.

¶46

4 The Chief Engineer-cum-Administrative, Sriramsagar projert, L. M.D colony, Karimnagar District.

¶47

5 The Superintendent Engineer, G.V.C - 4, L.M.D colony, Kar mnagar District.

¶48

...RESPONDENTS

¶49

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High co,-,t ,Ly 6e pieaseo to issue a writ or order or direction, more preferabry one in t e na[ure of writ of I,4andamus, declarrng the actions of the respondenti in not appointing the-petiiioner in any post pursuant to G.o.M No. 98 Dt 1sto4r1986, wherein inu gou"inr"nt pisseo orders to provide 50 percent emproyment to the unemproyed dispiaced vittageis, oue to the submergence of rands and dweflings under Lowei Manair Dam, Sriiamsagar Project. as rlleg_al, arbitrary, violative of principles ' of Natural Justice and also violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of lndia

¶50

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRt. ANNNAMpELLI GANGADHAR

¶51

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶52

WRIT PETI TION NO: 2064s oF 2021

¶53

Between:

¶54

l Anaoona Narender. S/o Rajaiah Aged about 36 years o:c. unemproyee R/o Award H No.. No.2/'1982-83 2-52iD, .Murkanoor dt 20.5.82f:iu"p" itiigrirmidJ mandar, xaiimnaEl-rr oisir[t

¶55

2 M-unig-ala Renuka, D/o Ramuru a.ged about 35 years occ. trnemproyee Fl/o 6 - 5- 304, Gandhi Road, Karimnagai (A"wJrd N;insdiirdl 3t.i.i"e8ii",ue '|^v,rv</sup>

¶56

¶57

3 Lngsoni^{sridhar,S/o MalraiahAged} about 2B years occ. unempiovee r/o It4utkanoor virase, chisurumamidi 6andiikl.iri"6ii oirir"t ti*irI il'"'),dzY 83 dated ZO.S.thazt

¶58

4 Kathi .Thirupath,i, S/o Dharmaiah Aged about 45 years Occ. unemolovee R/o "

¶59

Hno h,4anakondur vilase and mandit xuiimnigai 6iriiLtle*rio n;:;;d;_"8ili 30.5,198'l )

¶60

Koona sanjeev. S/o Rajaiah Aged about 46 years occ. unernprovee Raohavaour vittlge. Manakondur mandatl r<arimnagii^-ostr.ici- f^a*lid''iri"" 3li9Ei:#":i 30.6 1981)

¶61

6 Ammigalla Sampath. S/o yela,iah Aged about 40 yarn occ. unemrovee R/o (Award H.No, 1-88, No^'ll1e80-8.1 srinivasnagar oi rz.sso lvrankondui Aro srrii_8i"d;'i; viilJge ;nd-tuiandrrl ib,slsjbii" xrr^nu.iIll].ir)li^{ie.,u'u'J"'u(}

¶62

7 Ammigalla Babu, s/o Laxmaaih Aged about 40 years occ. unemprovee RJo Hanmajipally, vltlage, Ganneruvaiam mandal't"irfei"'A"X!"riif "rM;j;; Karimnagar district (Award No.7/83-84 dt 19.3.984) '

¶63

...PETITIONERS

¶64

AND

¶65

1 The Superintendino Enoineer/lvlember Convenor, G.V.Circle-lV, (SRSp Orgn), L.M.D.Cofony, Karimna-gar Diat.-^{- -}

¶66

2 The Administrator-cum-chief Engineer, Serection committee. s.R.S. project, LMD Colony, Karimnagar.

¶67

3 The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶68

4 Area Devetopment-Depi., The state of relangana, rep., Selreita by its principar Secretary, riat, nyj"iao, j.^"*'' rrrigation and command

¶69

,,.RESPONDENTS

¶70

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High couri may 6e pLaseo to issue a wrt or order, more particularly writ of It/andamus declaring thit the petitioner is entitled to appointment to the post of Junior Assistant/ office Subordinaie/Lascar etc or any other equivarent category of posts to the extent of 50 percent of vacancies earmarked as per G.O.l,4s. No.98 dt. i5.04.19g6 meant fordisplaced p"rron. qrot, ii necessary to create a supernumerary post under Sriramsagar project by incruding his name in the displaced persons list from time to time as per the conditions and norms mentioned in various G os., 34, dt 20.o2.2oog, G.o.tvis.No.45 dt. 28.i2.2020, Rlw G.o. lvs No. 68 dt. 17.5.2014 incruding the orders of the Honbre Tribunar in o.A. No.B203/2003 and batch d1.06.5.2004 and o.A.No. 7917l2oo3 dated 16.7.2004 and as. per judgment of High court in w.p.No.2436/2o11 dI g.2.2ol 1, Apex court judgment in s.L.P.No. 14305t2011 dt 4.7.2011 as the Awards are prior io issuance ot G.O. 98 dt.^'15-04-1986 and taking into account the proc. No. ACE/SRSP/E/414712018 dt.29.08.2019 and proc.No.EiIGVC.tv/M/834 dt. 18.8.201s of the 2nd respondent and consequenfly hord the action of the respondents in denying employment under drspraced persons category to the petitioner under displaced persons quota on one reason or the other including technical l."".on. *hil" appointing similarly praced persons is ilegar, arbitrary, diicriminatory, unjust and contrary to the dicta laid down by the Hon,ble Courts

¶71

IANO: 1OF2 021

¶72

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, t e Hlgr, court may be pleased to cirect the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment to the posts oi Junior Assistant/office Subordinate/ Lascai etc or any other equivalent category of posts under G.o.l,4s.No.98 pending disposar of the w.p pending disposar"of the above writ petition,

¶73

Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDy

¶74

¶75

¶76

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD '*

¶77

WP NO: 20657 OF 2021

¶78

Between:

¶79

Bonala Ravinder, S/o. Balaiah, Aged about 48 Years Oc:c. Unemployee, Ryo. H No. B-2-159/A, Bhagath Nagar, Beside of Challangr:r School Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶80

Kothakonda Sampath Kumar, S/o.Komuraiah, Agod about 34 Years Occ,Unemployee, Fl/o, H No. 8-4-57, Ganesh Nagar, Xarimnagar, Karimnagar District,

¶81

...PETITIONERS

¶82

AND

¶83

1 The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Government of I and CAD Department Secretariat Buildings Saifabad Hyderabad.

¶84

2 The Superintendent Engineer/ Member Convenor, G.V. Circle - IV ( SR SP Org ) LMD Colony Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶85

3 The Administrator - Cum Chief Engineer, Selection Comnrittee SRS Project LMD Colony, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶86

4 The District Collector - Cum Chairman, Selection Commitlee, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶87

,..RESPONDENTS

¶88

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Ccurt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not providing an employment to the petitioners ie., Laskars or any suitable equivalent employment to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the GOMs No. 9€ dated 15,04.'1986 and as well as the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of lndia consequently direct the respondents to provide an emt)loyment of Laskars or any equivalent / suitable employment to the petitioners.

¶89

lA NO:^'l OF 2021

¶90

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may b: pleased to direct the respondents to provide an employment of Laskars/any equiva ent employment to the petitioners forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.

¶91

Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. A JAGAN

¶92

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD

¶93

The Court made the following:

¶94

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶95

WRIT PETITION Nos.2O763 20770 20764 20645 e,20657 of2O2l

¶96

COMMON ORDER:

¶97

It is represented by learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Services that in similar circumstances, an order dated 24.08.2021 was passed by this court in W.P.No.19864 of 2O2l and the present writ petitions may also be disposed of on the same lines.

¶98

Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of giving iiberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority by submitting representations along with relevant documents in support of their claim. On receipt of such representations, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with lau. and take a decision thereon as expeditiously as possible.

¶99

As a sequcl, Ll-re miscellancous appiicatiot-rs perrding, if any, sirall ;rlso stand disposed of, There shall be no order-as to costs.

¶100

SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' IL-SECTION OFFICER

¶101

To 1 The Principal secretary, Revenue Department, state of relangana, secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶102

The District Collector of Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶103

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶104

The Chief Engineer-cum-Administrative, Sriramsagar project, L.tr,4.D colony,

¶105

Karimnagar District.

¶106

The Superintendent Engineer, G.V.C - 4, L.M.D colony, Karlmnagar District.

¶107

6r The Superintending Engineer/Member Convenor, G.V,Circle-lV, [SnSe Orgn;, L. It/. D.Cofony, Karimnagar Dist.

¶108

The Administrator-cum-Chief Engineer, Selection Committee. S.R.S. project, LIMD Colony, Karimnagar.

¶109

The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶110

The State of Telangana, rep., by its principal Secretary, lrrigation and command Area Development Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶111

1 0. 3 CCs to Sri. Annampelli Gangadhar, Advocate (OPUC)

¶112

One CC to Sri. Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]

¶113

12.Two CCs to the GP for Services I, High Court for the State of Telangana. (OUT) 13 Two CCs to GP for lrrigation & CAD, High Court forthe State of Telangana. lourl

¶114

1 4. One CC to Sri. A Jagan, Advocate [OpUC]

¶115

15.Two CD Copies.

¶116

LO. Une pare Cop

PN,I

HIGH COURT

DATED:01/09/2021

ORDER

WP.Nos. 207 63,^{2077 0, 2O764,} 20645 & 20657 ol²⁰²¹

¶122

Disposing of the WPs Without costs.

¶123

e r$ E SrA re' q
o
+
2
v
o
O 0 6 sEPzt?l t)7'-
.br
i,i
\ >+ a- ,'/
n---\ia\ r(.-t
.a;n

¶124

r--\ '-)
za.- -'

Bonala Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bonala Ravinder v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T Chandra Shekar Vs The Telangana State Power Generation Corporation Ltd.

B. Venkata Ramana Vs The State of Telangana

B.Sampath, s/o fate B. Venkataiah, Vs The Telangana State Northern Power Distribution

K. Shankar, Vs The State of Telangana

Anagoni Narender Vs The Superintending Engineer/Member Convenor

U.Srinivas Vs The District Collector and 3 Others