The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking promotion and setting aside a CASAT judgment regarding railway seniority. The petitioner informed the court of no intention to prosecute, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H'GH COURT FOR THE ST rs,;;;iI i 6,151 3j 55l3ji8,flfAr HYDE RABAD
THURSDAY, THE EI( ovE r\48 E R *o ri o rb"fl,fT ill'iiAl ?,t A
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJ
,,. ;" ;; H[ _.:'J ;:J;'J^ J"
Between:
WRIT P ETITION NO:20374 oF 200s
3!ffi,"y*:i#r?3i3;il3*l|llBais'KharasiHerp/LoFpat workshop,Laraguda, south
AND
...PET|TIoNER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more in the nature of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Skilled Grade-lll and Grade-ll, with effect from 1996 by protecting his seniority at Loco Shed, Lalaguda, on par with hisjuniors with all consequential benefits and also set aside the impugned order No.LGDS/P53s/LOFP, dated 23-9-2004 and judgement of Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in OA No.1340 of 2004, dated 19-4-2005 as illegal, arbitrary.
WPMP. NO: 25958 OF 2005
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspendthe judgment of Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in O.A.No.1340 of 2004, dated 19-4-2005.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIM. VENKANNAFORSRl. K. SUDHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT PUSHPINDERKAUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEHON,BLE SRI JUSTICE P'NAVEENRAO
M' LAXMAN THE H.N'BL, ""u''"E
WRIT oNNq.20374 of 2oo5
ORDER:(Per Hon'bteSi JusticeP' NaueenRao)
Sri M.Venkanna,learned counselrepresenting
Sri K.Sudhakar Reddy,learned counsel for the petitioner' submits that thepetitioneris not intendingto prosecute the writ petition'
Recordingthe said submission' the writ petitionis dismissed' Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petitionshall
stand closed.
/iTRUECOPY//
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR l sEc#NoFFlcER
To,
1 2 3ffi 3313.',i],t,'.x'r?#31'?;,fl'd$o"::?3"o''o,t','' J. TwoCD CoPies 4. OneSPare CoPY CHR Anv fr"
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811112021
1Hg STA r€: o,
'(
i
c.J n g DEC20?1 C)
ORDER
W.P.No.20374 of 2005
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
e(V -o\r' @
Sri K. Sudhakar Reddy
The General Manager, South Central Railway
The Divisional Officer
The Works Manager
Sri Justice P. Naureen Rao
Justice Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
