The High Court of Telangana withdrew the filing fee or brief describe the procedural action. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 18.11.2021.
Leave to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition granted; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
ctvr L REVIS ION PETITION NO: 1430 0F 2018
Petition under Article 222 ol the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 26.02.2018 in t.A.No.116s ol 2017 in o.s.No.1002 ol 2012, on the fite of the Court of the XV Additional District Judge, Kukatpally.
Between:
Mr. Thota Gurunath Reddy, S/o. T. Gurudatta Reddy, Aged 60 years, Occ: Do.ctor, R/oprot No.i292, Road No$S, luuiree-iriris, rivol,il#:soodJi, Telangana
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1
AND
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIbNERS/PLAINTIFF NO.2 & 3
Counsel for the petitioner: SRI p. VIKRAM
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI T. JAYANT JAISOORyA
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI K. PRATIK REDDy
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
-2-
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND TT E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN
t
CIVL REVISION PETITION No.1430 of 2Ol8
ORDER: lPer Hc.t'ble Si Justice p. Naueen Rao)
Sri P. Vik; am, learned counsel for the petitioner, filed a letter dated 10. 1 L2Oi I in rhe Registry seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the Cir i1 Revision Petition.
Leave is gr rnted and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Mis<:llaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil
Revision Petition shall stand closed.
SD/-K.ONESIM ASSISTAI{T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// h- SEC:TION OFFICER
To,
1 . The XV Addition, I District Judge, Ranga ReddyDistrict at Kukatpally 2. One CC to Sri P. Vikram, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri T. Jayant Jaisoorya, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri K. Prathik Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare Copy s br
HIGH COURT
DATED: 18l,1112021
ORDER
CRP.No.1430 of 2018
l.tE SiA ).C
lio 3 r Drclcil
l,\ i--
<br>
DISMISSING THr: CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS WITHDRAWII
\ I
Mr. Thota Gurunath Reddy
Gleneagles Hospital private Limited
Paradigm Corploration privete Limited
P. Naveen Rao
M. Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
