Valiveti Padmavathi Devi v. The State of Telangana and 6 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging an order denying fair compensation for acquired agricultural property was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners.
Writ petition challenging an order denying fair compensation for acquired agricultural property was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 20297 oF 2020
Betwee n:
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Itrlandamus declaring the letter vide Lr.No.EE/lB/KIvllM/DB/TSl2l294-981M dated 18-07 -2020 of the Sth respondent wherein it is informed to the petitioners that cannot be considered the request of the petitioners with regard to acquired and pay the compensation in respect of agriculture property in extent AC 1 1 .1 3 Guntas in Survey No.517, in an extent of AC 5.04 Guntas in Survey No.518, in an extent of AC 4.20 Guntas in Survey No.5'19, in an extent of AC 6.00 Guntas in Survey No.540, in an extent of AC 6.33 Guntas in Survey No.542, total in an extentof AC 33.30 Guntas situated at Kalakota Village, Bonakal Mandal. Khammam District by disposing of representations dated 08-07 -2020 made by thepetitioners asillegal,
2-
arbitrary,withoutjurisdiction,competentandunreasonableandunconstitutional ,.J'"ioirti"gthe article li,zi ,na'300-A constitutionof lndia, besidesviolation of orincioles of natural ius'tice.and consequently set aside the letter vide [r.r.r.le,re/t(r,rrr,rrioalrslilzg4-g8/Mdated 18-07-2020 of the 5th respondent with a directionto the iespondentsto initiate the proceedings and pay the .orp"n.utioncontemplated lnderthe provisions.of the right to fair compensation ,no ir"nrp"r"ncyland ,.qririiionand Rehabilitation and Resettlement act 2013 in iespect oi agricuitureproperty belongsto the petitioners as stated supra'
(Prayer is amended asper C.O.d l.2gt1l2O21 in lA No'212020')
IANO: 1 OF 2020
PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interimdirection, 'the respondents to initiate the proceedingsand {np"nrrlioncontemplated under ihe provisionsof the right to fair compensation uno.tn.p,|."ncylandacquisitionandRehabilitationandResettlementact20l3 towards agricultureptop"riyin extentAC 11 13 Guntasin SurveyNo 517' in an extent of AC5.04 cuntas in survey No.5.18,in an extentof AC 4.20 Guntasin Suivey uo.stg, in an extent,of Rc 6.oo Guntasin Survey No 540' in an extentof Ac6.33GuntasinSurveyNo.542,totalinanextentofAC33.30Guntassituated uifutut otuVitlage, Bonakal Mandal. Khammam District by suspending the letter vide Lr.No.EE/tBiKMM/DB/TSt2lzg4-g1lM daled 1810712020of the sth respondent, pending disposal of this writpetition.
Counsel for thePetitioners:SRl. V'V'LAKSHMINARAYANA
Counsel for theRespondent Nos. 1, 3, 6 & 7: GP FOR REVENUE
CounselfortheRespondentNos'2,4&5:GPFORIRRIGATION&CAD'
The Court madethe following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.20297 of 2020
ORDER
Learned counsel for thepetitioners expresses desire to withdraw
the writpetition. A letter dated 16.11.2021 to the above effecthas already
been filed andplaced on record of the Court.
In view of the same, the writpetition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Pending miscellaneouspetitions, if any, shall stand closedin the lightof
this final order. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SDi.L.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR v
SECTION OFFICER
To
PM
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811112021
STATE
C
stt 1$?1
:)o $s ai
(r'
.rC
ORDER
WP.No.20297 ot 2020
Dismissing the WP, As withdrawn Without costs,
% Dbt')/ @
Valiveti Padmavathi Devi
Z Kondraganti Seetharnahalakshmi
The State of Telangana
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court