The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 2028 of 2020 as withdrawn by the petitioner, who sought a declaration that the respondent's action in denying electricity connection was illegal and arbitrary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2028 OF 2O2O
Between:
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no.1 in issuing Memo vide no. CGM(Comml)/SE(C)/DE(CyADE-lll/D.No.66812018-19 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the said the same and further direct the Respondent No.'1 to provide electricity service connection to the Petitioners property with a load of 5% HP. lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondent No. 1to immediately provide Electricity Service Connection to the Petitioner's Property with a load of 5% HP, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAGI SHRAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI R. VINOD REDDY,
S.C. FOR TSTRANSCO
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/S. PEARL LAW ASSOCIATES
The Court made the following: ORDER
TI. E HON,BLE SRI JUSTICET.VII\iODKUMAR
P N No. f20
ABqEB
Learned :ounselfor the petitionerexpressesdesire to withdraw the Writpetition.Aletterdated30.ll.202ltotheaboveeffecthasalready been iiled andrlacedon recoroof the Court'
In view )f thesame,the writ petitionis disntissedas withdrawn'
Pendingmiscelaneouspetitions,ifany,shallstandclosedinthe|ightof
this final order.No orderas to costs.
s D/-Mo H D sAN i{iHtt+tAt ,TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
o P uc ) "' i Eli EE il F;i"n: if#tr*,.,-:,,:" isiil::i .L",Lt"j 3. One CC One CC CCto M/s M/sP )ar)ar
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 l12l'|,021
1 ',rE STA16
,t
!
).J 21DEc:0?l
ORDER
WP.No.2028 o' 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION ASWITHDRAWN WITHOUT CO:iTS c) $o'
Jilkapally Laxman
Chief General Manger(Commercial), TSSPDCL
Superintendent Engineer (Operations)
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
