Petitioner filed W.P. No. 12475 of 2018 seeking a writ of mandamus for payment of compensation for acquired land. The petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition via letter, which was accepted by the court.
Disposal of the writ petition by dismissing it as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S7 cr;ili 315,3i lfnl3#"",iliAr HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, rwo in o u THb'IfiffJ#fi .o,ir?. " *'. *
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 12 475 0F 2018
Between:
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of firlandamus, to declare the action of the Respondent No. 2 in not awarding compensation in respect of the land of 333 Sq. yards along with structures acquired for the purpose of National Highway as illegal arbitrary and consequentially direct Respondent No. 2 to award compensation in respect of the 333 Sq. yards of land in Survey No. 112 of Laxmidevipally Village, Bhadradri, Kothagudem District to the Petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased to pass orders directing the respondent no.2 to immediatelyaward compensationin respect of the 333 sq.yards of land in surveyno.1/2 of LaxmidevipallyVillage,Bhadradri Kothagudem District to thepetitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAMA SHARANASHARMA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRINAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO' ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GPFOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI ]USTICE T.VINODKUMAR
w PETITIONNo. 12475 of 2018
QEDEB:
Learned counsel for thepetitionerexpressesdesire to withdraw the writ petition. A letter dated 10.11.2021to the aboveeffecthas already been filed andplaced on record of theCourt.
In vlew of the same, the writpetition is dismissed aswithdrawn, Pending miscellaneouspetitions, if any, shall stand closed in thelightof this final order. No order as to costs.
SD/.P.PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTRE ISTRAR
,TRUE COPY// SECTION FICER
To,
MP NPJ V
t (
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 11212021
ORDER
WP.No.12475 ot 20'18
-r r.rk- S IA i€
.<br>.{
J
o 02 Ftl 2022
I
\ 2,
DFs " '- r.l tZ
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITIONAS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
k*
arr@
Nishanth Kancharla
Government of India
Competent Authority (LA)
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
