Dismissed

Dr. a. Parameswar Naik, Adilabad Dist. and Ano v. the Commissioner, Ayush Dept., Hyd and 4 Othrs

Telangana HC24 Aug 2021WP/19340/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana permitted withdrawal of writ petitions challenging the legality of a Government Order regarding Ayush department postings and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petitions was granted, and the petitions were dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Dr. a. Parameswar Naik, Adilabad Dist. and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF^AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.RAJASHEKER REDDY} AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE^{SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶5

WRIT PETITIO N NOS: 19339 &^{19340 OF} 2j]!

¶6

WP NO : 19339 OF 2010

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Dr. A. Parameswar Naik, S/o.^{BalaramNaik Working as Senior Medical} Officer, Govt. Ayurvedic Dispensary^{Jinnaram, Adilabad District}

¶9

2 Dr. P. Dasaradh, S/o. Venkataiah^{Working as Senior MedicalOfficerGovt.} lndian Medicine, Pharmacy^(Ayur )^{Katedan, Hyderabad}

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

The Commissioner, Department of^{Ayush,Abids,Hyderabad}

¶13

fhe Government of Andhra^{Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Health, Medical} and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat,^Hyderabad

¶14

Dr. M. Chandu, Medical Officer^{( Ayurveda} )^{G'A.D. Waddekothepally,} Warangal District

¶15

Dr. B.Joshi Sing,, Medical Officer^{( Ayurveda} ),^{G.A.D. Haripalem} Visakhapatnam District

¶16

The A.P. Administrative Tribunal,,^{Rep. by its RegistrarPurane Haveli,} Hyderabad

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction especially one in the^{nature of writ of} certiorari cailing for records^pertaining to^{o.A.No.3658/2009 with VI/A No. 1448} /2009 and its order dl 20-07-2010 0n^{the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunaland} quash the same and further declare that G.O.Rt.No. 17, dt: 03-1-2009^{of the 2nd} respondent and consequential memo No.^{9924/Ayur.1112005,dt: 29-'1-2009 of} the 1st respondent as illegal and^{arbitrary.Hence they are liable to be set aside}

¶19

WPM P. NO: 24489 OF 2010

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to} suspend the operation of the G.O.Rt.No.^{17, dt: 3-1-2009anl the consequential} memo issued by the 1st Respondent^{in Memo No. 9924/Ayur.1112005dt. 29-1-} 2009 pending disposal of the writ^petition.

¶21

\rWMP. NO: F 2011

¶22

Between:

¶23

1 Dr. M. Chandu, S/o. Shukru, age 49^{years, Occ: lModicalOfficer,} Government Ayurvedic Dispensary, Waddekothep:llly,^Warangal District, R/o. H.No. 1-1-165/35, Near Kumar^{Hotel,NIT Khajipet,} Warangal District.

¶24

2 Dr. B.Joshi Sing, S/o. Laxman Singh, aged 48^{years, Occ: Medical} Officer, Government Ayurvedic Dispensary,^{Haripalem PHC,} Achuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, New^{Post Office,} Khammam.

¶25

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS NO. 3 &^{4 IN WP 19339 OF 201O}

¶26

AND

¶27

Dr. A. Parameswar Naik, S/o. Balaram Naik^{Working as Senior Medical} Officer, Govt. Ayurvedic Dispensary Jinnaram, Adilabad^District

¶28

Dr. P. Dasaradh, S/o. Venkataiah Working as^{Senior Vedical Officer Govt.} lndian Medicine, Pharmacy⁽ Ayur ) Katedan, Hyderabad

¶29

....RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN WP NO. 19339 OF^201O

¶30

The Commissioner, Department of Ayush, Abids, Hyderabad

¶31

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶32

The A.P. Administrative Tribunal,, Rep. by its Registrar Purane Haveli, Hyderabad

¶33

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP NO. 19339 OF^201O

¶34

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased vacate the interim orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 21 .9.2010 in WP No. 19339 of 2010.

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. M SRINIVASA RAO

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent Nos^ 1 & 2: GP FOR MEDICAL & HEALTH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: SRl. J R MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 5:

¶37

WP NO: 19340 OF 2010

¶38

Between:

¶39

1 Dr- A. Parameswar Naik, S/o. Balaram Naik Working as Senior Medical Officer, Govt. Ayurvedic Dispensary Jinnaram, Adilabad District

¶40

2 Dr. P. Dasaradh, S/o. Venkataiah Working as Senior Medical Officer Govt. lndian Medicine, Pharmacy (Ayur ) Katedan, Hyderabad

¶41

...PETITIONERS

¶42

AND

¶43

1 . The Commissioner, Department of Ayush Abids, Hyderabad

¶44

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶45

Dr. M. chandu, Medical Officer ( Ayurveda ) G.A.D. Waddekothepally, Warangal District

¶46

Dr. B.Joshi Sing,, Medical Officer ( Ayurveda ), G.A.D. Haripalem Visakhapatnam District

¶47

The A.P. Administrative Tribunal,, Rep. by its REgistrar Purane Haveli, Hyderabad

¶48

...RESPONDENTS

¶49

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for records pertaining to O.A.No. 226312010 and its order dt: 2007-2010 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal and quash the same and further declare that G.O.Rt.No. 17, dt: 17-1-2009 of the 2nd respondent and consequencial memo No. 992414yur.1112005, dt: 29-1-2009 of the 1st respondent as illegal and arbitrary. Hence they are liable to be set aside.

¶50

WPMP. NO: 24490 OF 2010

¶51

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the G.O.Rt.No. 17, dt: 3-1-2009 and the consequential memo issued by the 1st pending disposal of the writ petition

¶52

WVMP. NO:749 OF 2011

¶53

Between:

¶54

Dr. M. Chandu, S/o. Shukru, age 49 years, Occ: Medical Officer, Government Ayurvedic Dispensary, Waddekothepally, Warangal District, R/o. H.No.'1 -1 - 165/35, Near Kumar Hotel, NIT Khajipet, Warangal District.

¶55

Dr. B.Joshi Sing, S/o. Laxman Singh,^{aged 48 years, Occ: Medical Officer,} Government A/urvedic Dispensary, Haripalem^{PHC, AchuthapuramMandal,} Visakhapatnam District, New Post Office,^Khammam.

¶56

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENS NO. 3^{& 4 IN IVP 19340 OF2O1O}

¶57

AND

¶58

Dr. A. Parameswar Naik, S/o. Balaram^{Naik Working as Senior lr/edical} Officer, Govt. Ayurvedic Dispensary Jinnaram,^{AdilabaCDistrict}

¶59

Dr. P. Dasaradh, S/o. Venkataiah Working^{as SeniorMedicalOfficer Govt.} lndian lvledicine, Pharmacy⁽ Ayur ) Katedan,^HyderabaC

¶60

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS^{IN WP I',IO. 19340 OF 201O}

¶61

The Commissioner, Department of^{Ayush Abids, Hyderabad}

¶62

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by^{its Secretary, Health,} Medical and Family Welfare Dept., Secretariat,^Hyderabad

¶63

The A.P. Administrative Tribunal,,^{Rep. by its REgistrar Purane Haveli,} Hyderabad

¶64

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP ]'IO. 19340 OF^201O

¶65

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the cir:umstances stated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court rnay be pleased to} vacate the interim orders of this Hon'ble Court dt. 21.9.2010^{in WP.No. 19340of} 2010.

¶66

Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. M SRINIVASA RAO

¶67

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.¹ & 2: GP^{FOR MEDICAL& HEALTH}

¶68

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: SRl. J^{R MANOHARIIAO}

¶69

Counsel for the Respondent No. 5:

¶70

The Court made the following:

¶71

¶72

HON' BLE SRI JUSTICE A,RAJASHE R DDY AND HO N'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAM EEM AKTHER

¶73

WP Nos .19 339 & 19340 of 2O1O

¶74

COMMON oRDER:

¶75

Sri M. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions as no cause survive for adjudication.

¶76

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, permission is hereby accorded and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs

¶77

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

One CC^{to Sri. M Srinivasa Rao' Advocate} !9ly9f i. o;; cc^{to sri.,lR Manohar Rao Advocate IOPUC]} 3. Two CCs^{to GPfor Me;ic;ltiealth'High Court for the Stateof Telangana'} [ouT]

¶83

Two CD^CoPies.

¶84

One^{SPare CoPY.}

PM =.l!J'

HIGH COURT

DATED:2410812021

E S iAr^-
( t
g
clo 15 sEPz0?l

¶89

COMMON ORDER

¶90

WP.Nos.19339 & 19340 of 2010

¶91

Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.

¶92

+<
NF

Dr. a. Parameswar Naik, Adilabad Dist. and Ano v. the Commissioner, Ayush Dept., Hyd and 4 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. a. Parameswar Naik, Adilabad Dist. and Ano v. the Commissioner, Ayush Dept., Hyd and 4 Othrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Bijju Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Dasari Sammakka Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Angadi Uma Vs The State of Telangana and another

J.Mahesh Babu and 3 others Vs The State Bank of India and 2 others

Eluri Ravikanth, Vs Bodepudi Aruna

Maherunnissa Vs The State of Telangana