High Court allowed withdrawal of appeal No.486 of 2013 filed against OS No.7/2008 upon submission that parties settled out of court, and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
APPEAL SUIT NO: 486 OF 2013
Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 31.03.2011 in OS No.7/2008 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, at Khammam.
Between:
...APPELLANTS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
ASMP. NO: 1406 OF 2013
Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased togrant injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or creating thirdparty right over the suit scheduleproperty
For the Appellant : SRI VIVEK JAIN, Advocate
For the Respondents : -
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER RE:DDY AND HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTH.ER
AS No.486 of 2013
ORDER:
Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties in the appeal have settled the disputes, which is subject matter ol appeal, out of Court and therefore the appellants want to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel has also filed a memo dated 24-02-202 1 to that effec t.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, permission is hereby accorded and the appeal is dismissed as vrithdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending shal1 stand
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
sd/-cv Mt:,ffiH$HEXA
,TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To
1 . The DistrictJudge, Khammam'
,. o;;Ect,;'stiv'iu"r,Jain, Advocate(oPUg) .s. 6'# 66 i;5;iv.nasnu, Advocate (oPUC)
$r'----
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410812021
'f .t
L ()*:
( o
\ o:)r) 21s$tttl
.k
,*t.
I a!::-,-1
ORDER
AS.No.486 of2013
DISMISSING THE APPEALAS WITHDRAWN.
,6
u
D
Eluri Ravikanth
Gudichutti Ramesh Kumar
Bodepudi Aruna
Bodepudi Veeraiah
A. Rajasheker Reddy
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
