In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged a search tender notification issued by the Wakf Board for a Dargah. Arguing it was illegal and violated fundamental rights, the petitioner sought a declaration and a stay of proceedings. The court dismissed the writ petition without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Between:
WRIT PETITION NO: 18177 0F 2 021
Fi{rT{"']11i.-?!?i,?UIB,,"ti,Ti,loSi*j',";i,.f:|.;f-::Business, Lalaguda. Secunderabad. Hyderabad.
AND
...PETITIONER
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of Respondent No.2 in issuing the sear render Notification vide F.No.13/RR/DJ'/AUCTTON/2018 Dt. 31t07/2021 without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 23t06t2021 for continuing hirn as contractor in respect of Dargah Hazrath Jahangir peeran (R.H.) situated at lnmulnarva (V), Kothur Mandar, Ranga Reddy District for a further period of 6 months as illegar, arbitrary and viorative of Art. 19 and 21 of the constitution of rndia and the principles of natural justice.
IA NO i I AF 2021
Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay a, further proceedings in pursuance of the Sear render Notification v de F.No 13/RR/DJP/AUCTToN/2olB Dt. 31r0712021 in respecl of Dargah Hazrath Jahangir Peeran (R.H.) situated at lnmulnarva (V), Kothur Ir,4andal, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KIRAN PALAKURTHT FOR
Ms. SRILATHA PALAKURTHI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRr ABU AKRAM, sc FoR WAKF BOARD The Court made the following: ORDER
1_
I
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAo
WRIT PETITIONNo.18 L77 of 2O2l
ORDER:
Sri Kiran Palakurthl,Iearned counsel repres:ntingMs' Sril:rtl-ra Palakurthi,lcarnedcournsel lor rhe petitioner,represents thiit thc cttLtscitl tiLc u'rir pcritiundut's not snt-rir e Rccorclit'rg lhcsaicl subrnission, thc WrilPetitionis riisrnissec'I.Pt:ndingmisccllalleous petilions' if an".' shall sland r'lo sc cl
//TRUECOPY//
K' SAILESHI ASSII;TANTREGISTRAR tt, l,t-' sdcrroYoFFlcER _--,
To ' i ?'l: 33 Ji"$ r?i i'$1,: r'it:\i:i!, tlJs "3:"' i"'3'i3l state cr re I a n s a n a at . lf:f$;Lo"'J,"sri' Abu Akram' sc ror wakr Board [oF'uc] 4 Two CDCoPies 5. OneSPare CoPY CHR TP $5
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2310812021
ORDER
t,";<br>,.<br>(; ll
$sst?ttll ;J
-oo
..c
*
l(
W.P.No.18177 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the declaration of the action of Respondent No.2 in issuing a search tender Notification without considering the petitioner's representation as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 19
Whether the High Court should stay further proceedings in pursuance of the Search Tender Notification pending disposal of the Writ Petition under Section 151 CPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
