Petition before the High Court for the State of Telangana was allowed by the Petitioners to be withdrawn; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
\
PRESENT
| THEHON'BLESRIJUSTICEP.NAVEENRAO | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Betw | een: | WRITPETITION NO: 17s60OF 2021 | |
| SyedFarhathullahSohail S/oLateS1.edKiajaNamarhullah :9.,*r.6years,Occ:Business, lVo.PIotNvo_8-t-?I/r,rfornbsRd, )uryanagar.ToliChowki,Hyderabad_g |
|||
| l | ) | f,y,.^o:.1,091,.1?T?!i@Farzana Kh an, wioMohd.MajidK.han Age:72years,Occ: Housewife lVo.H.No.6-3_ 609/187. Anandnagar,Khainabad,Hyderabad. |
|
| I |
J | SyedShafakathullah Khaleel s./oL:r_eSyedK-hajaNamarhullah Age:.)Eyears,Occ: Landlord, Y?1*"3-t-29:.Florel ZanrZampalace, llabuSerh Esrare,Srarion Road, NandeJ_llroOr |
|
| I I I |
I)e,titioner\ os.l& 3are | ||
| I I I I i It |
I.p.UlCPA Hoider S;edFarhathullahSohail )f^t:,:SledKhajaNarnathull,rtr-; "' Age:)61ear.s.Occ:Business, I('o.PIorNo,-g;l-2i12l,TornbsRd, rur)an3gar,'l'oliChorvki,Hyder.abad -g |
||
| t I |
AND | .Petitioners | |
| TheStateofTelansana. *:oo,itsprincipitSecrerary, KevenueDepartment. Secretariat, Hyderabad |
|||
| 2 | ffi "i,",US;J::l;:.1trff ReddvDi strict |
||
| 1 | I.r.,n1l.DivisionalOfficer, KandukurDivision,Kandukur, xangaReddyDisrrict |
1
I
I i I i
i
I
I
I
I I
| a--> | |
|---|---|
| The Tahsildar, BalapurMandal, RangaRedd; District |
|
| lheTahsildar. Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict |
|
| 6 | RavulaEllarrrna W/oLateJangilappa Agedabout80years,Occ:Housewife |
| 7 | RavulaAnjaiahS/oLateJangilappa Agedabout 58years,Occ:Agriculture |
| 8 | RavulaChandra ShekharS/oLateJangilappa Agedabout31years,Occ;Agriculture |
| 9 | Ravr-rlaMahinderS/oLateJangilappa AgedabotLt29 years,Occ:Agriculture |
| l0 | Ravula VenuCopalS/o Late Jangilappa .{-!redaboLlt27 years,Occ:Agriculture |
| II | Ravula ShankariahS/o Late Jangilappa Agedaborrt55years,Occ:Agriculttrre |
| t2. | RavulaSrisailamS/oRavulaShankariah Agedabout 29 years,Occ:Agriculture |
| I3. | Ravulal-axrriahS/oLateJangilappa Agedabout 52 years,Occ:Business |
| I,+. | RavulaMalleshS/oLateJangilappa Agedabou.t52years,Occ:Business |
| Res Raj Als Ran |
pondentNos.6tol4areR./oH.No.18-4-781/3/B, amaBowli,SriRamnagar, Hyderabad oR/o H.No.8-1-209,Mailardevpally,Rajendema6,ar, gaReddyDistrict |
...Respondents
l I I
(-3
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly one in the natureof Wril of Certiorari to call for the rqcords in Case No.8/768/1994d1.2011112010passed by the Respondent No.5 under section 32(1) of AP(TA) Tenancy and AgriculturalLands Act,'1 950 granting restoration ofpossessionin the lands in Survey Nos.1 4, 45, 51 ' 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and 58, totally admeasuringAcs.14026 guntas situated at Jalpally, Balapur tr/andal and consequentlyset-asidethe order dated20l1 112010 in respect of the Land in Sy.No.54 admeasuringAc.12-37guntas, situatedat Jalpally, Balapur Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High court may be pleasedto suspend the operation ofthe Proceedingsdt.20/11/20'10 vide case No.8/768/1994 passedbytheRespondentNo.5undersection32(1)ofAP(TA)Tenancyand Agricultural Lands Act, 1950in respect of Land in Sy.No.54 to an extent o'f Ac.12-37 guntas, situated at Jallpally, Balpur MandalRanga Reddy District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners:M/s.K. JAMALI
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1to 5: GP FORREVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentNos.6to 14: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following:ORDER
1-
I
THE HON,BLESRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAo 1 WRIT PETITION No.17560of2
ORDER:
After makingelaborate submissions,whentLe Courtis about to dictatethe order, learned counselfor the petit:onersseeks permission of the Courtto withdraw the writ petitionwith liberty to the petitionersto avail appropriate remedies as availabiein law'
While expressingdispleasure, the Court agreesfor the request of learnedcounseifor the petitionersand permitsthe petitioners to withdrawthe writ petitionAccordingly, the writ petition rs dismisseclas withdrawnwith liberry as sought for by I o s e d' t h e nr . Pe n di n g_ Ti :. : JB l":.rf: P-eti tio n s, -if a nY, s h a ll s tr I n d -c SDhI.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT -"""REqISTRAR'-K-" \ //TRUE coPY/ SECTION OFFICER</sup>
To,I ?,13 33JiJ3'i"ifffi5$3lftiii$3,i#3)"" State or r eransana at
Hvderabad. [OUT]
CHR
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610812021
ORDER
W.P.No.17560 of 2021
E STAr€.
1 t{
e
J
bEP 2021
o 0 B
oF ..1
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
.
Syed Farhathullah Sohil and others
The State of Telangana and others
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
