The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 16148 of 2021 as withdrawn in the presence of the Court, granting liberty to approach appropriate authorities.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STA.TE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16148 OF 2021
Betwee n:
lv4anne Janga Reddy, S/o late Jana Reddy Aged 43 years Occ. Agriculture R/o.Aregudem Village, H/o Panthangi Choutuppal lt4andal, Yadadri Bhongir District ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed in Case No.ST/D51153012021 and Case No.A2192112019 dated 0210212021 by the Court of Special Tribunal, Ranga Reddy District and the impugned proceedings No.8/969/2006 dated 04/05/2006 and Memo No.Bi986/2008 dated 2610712008 by the Respondent No.5 is as being arbitrary, illegal and contrary to Section 5(3) of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass Book Act, 1971 (repealed) and Rules I and 20 of Rules, 1989 (repealed) and also against Section'16 of the Act, 2020 and Rule 7 of the Rules, 2020 apart from violation of principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 300-4 of the Constilution of India
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned orders passed in Case No.ST/D5/153012021 and Case No. A2192112019 daled 0210212021 by the Court of Special Tribunal, Ranga Reddy District and the impugnedproceedings No.B/969i2006 daled 0410512006 and Memo No.8/986/2008 daled 2610712008 by the Respondent No.5, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.SASIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEENRAO
WRIT PETITION No.16148 of 2O2L
ORDER;
Having regard to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.7i70 ol 2021, which was filed challenging the very same decision, impugned in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as available in law.
Cranting the said liberty, the writ petition is rlismissed as rvithclrari'n. Pending miscellaneous petitions, iI art.i', shall stand i l,seci
ASSISTANT 'D/'B''ATYA'ATHIREGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// eY" \ SECTIONOFFICER
'" I ff: 3B j:j8I,:iil:i3l[:ilil,.T::i'8?5 B?'leor r':ransana'Hvderabad IOUT]
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510812021
SIAT€ O
z
[]s1t11 .! I
tt
r) *//
<br>I orsPS
ORDER
WP.No.16148of 2021
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS.
1
lv4anne Janga Reddy
The State of Telangana
Samala Srikanth Reddy
P Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
