An approacher petitions the High Court seeking a writ to quash proceedings and direct reinstatement into service. The court closes the petition without costs, noting the petitioner’s grievance has been resolved.
Writ petition was closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S'I r,,;; ;,'6lE,Pj llllj|;G,flfAr HyD ERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY trItr''J h^V ] * o ri o u'.'il,,'J LfJ1rtil,i&..tor. *
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO.17 31 0F 21
Between:
Uiliffi ',,*:rr#h$:v:l$#Nirl{:ff fl}J!:t'":,r:iiji,n;;i.31,
AND
...PETITIONER
I i!:.i:?f,:lJi|T)BBIErep. bv its principar Secretary,HomeDepartment,
z. the Commissioner of police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other approprrate writ, order or direction, by calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing No. D.o.No. 3323/No.L&o/BrtrttBsr2}t2o21, dt. 1otosr2021 and quash the same by declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutio nal being violative of Articles 14, i6 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing No. D.O.No. 3323/ No. L&OlBll-1r18512812021, dl. 1010512021, by reinstating him into service by passing orders on the representation of the petitioner, pending final disposal of the main W.P.,
Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. K. JAYAPRAKASH RAO
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE ABTIINANDKUMAR SHAVILI w PET oNNo. 17031of 2021
ORDER:
counselfor the Petitioner When thematteris taken up for hearing' has informedthe Court that the grievanceof the petitioner has been resolvedin pursuanceof the interlocutoryorderspassedby this court' 2. CovernmentPleader appearing for the respondentshad also contendedthat in view of the interimorders dated 27 '07 '2021'Ihe petitioner wasreinstatedinto serviceby proceedingsdated 12'08'2021and the causein the writ petitiondoes not survive'
grievance of thepetitionerhas been resolved'
Pending miscellaneous Petitions,if any'shall stand closed'
*t",{+^tffSE3"."tt"^Ht'/
\
//TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
"' I ?,13 33 j%' l, 6,[; il?fi B:",IAT ff;i HIi^.;'&!?Jyi+e I a ns an a a t H vde ra b ad touTl
MP
HIGHCOURT
DATED:25t1012021
ORDER
WP.No.17031of 2021
CLOSTNG THEWRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
<br>-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for reinstatement survives after the petitioner has been reinstated in pursuance of interim orders.
Listed parties
The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad City
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
