Disposed

Syed Ainuddin Arif v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Sept 2021WP/15900/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage, directing the revenue authorities to expeditiously consider the petitioner's online grievance application regarding the inclusion of land in the prohibitory list under the Dharani portal within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent authorities to pass necessary orders on the online application No. 2100002116 within eight weeks, expeditiously and putting interested parties on notice.

Syed Ainuddin Arif Vs The State of Telangana — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 1s900 0F 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Syed Ainuddin Arif, S/o. Late Syed lsmail, Aged about 60^years, Occ:^Business. - . R/o. Plot. No.120, Road No.14, Banjaa Hills, Hyderabad,^{presently residing in USA.}

¶8

..,PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of^Revenue Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Collector, Vikarabad, Telangana.

¶12

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad District, Vikarabad.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Vikarabad District, Telangana.

¶14

The Commissioner, Chief Commissioner of Land Administration,^(CCLA)

¶15

Nampally Station Road, Abids, Hyderabad, Telangana

¶16

...RES'ONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^{may be pleasedto} pass an order to issue an appropriate writ or direction, more in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the second Respondent^{in not consideringthe} application of the Petitioner uploaded under the^{grievance portal in Dhraniportal vide} Application No.2100002'1 16 dt.311312021 for not adding the^{property i.e. land in} Survey No.216/E, admeasuring Acres 11-00, Guntas, land in Survey^No.216/U, admeasuring Acres 14-13 Guntas, land in Survey No.²¹ 6/RU, admeasuring^Acres 1 2-00, Guntas, totally admeasuring Acres 37-¹ 3 Guntas, situated at^Sidduloor Chincha lam Village, Sidduloor Grampanchayath, Vikarabad Mandal,^Vikarabad District in the prohibitory list, and to^process the sale deed submitted vide Application No. 21003065'16, dated 3010312021 by the Purchaser as illegal,^{and arbitrary,} unco n stitutiona I and against the^principles of natural Justice, consequently^{direct the} respondents to consider the application of the Petitioner uploaded under^the grievance portal in Dhrani portal vide Application No. 2100002116 dl.311312021 . lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the} affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 in the interim to dispose of application of the Petitioner uploaded under the grievance^portal in Dhrani^portal vide Application No.21000021^{16 dt.} 311312021, pending disposal of the main writ^petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KISHORE RAI

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶21

The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶23

WRIT PETITIO N^{No, LS9OO of 2O2L}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Hertrd the learned^{counsel for the petitioner and the learned} Government^{Pleader for Revenuefor all the respondents'With} their cori sent, the^{Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission} stage.

¶26

Agllrieved by the^{action ofrespondentNo 2 innot} considering the^{online application submitted by the petitioner vide} Applicati,rn^{No.2100002116 dated 3l'O3'2021 , the presentwrit} petition is filed.

¶27

LerLrned Government^{Pleader for Revenue states that the} respondent authorities^{will pass necessaryorderson the online} applicatir>r-r^{submitted by the petitioner,in accordance with law' at} the earlie st.

¶28

Hauing regard^{to the above made submissions, rrv'ithoutgoing} into the rnerits^{or demeritsof the case, the writ Petition is disposed} of directireg the^{respondentauthoritiesto passnecessary orders on} the online application^{No.2100002116 made by the petitioneron} 31.03.2021 through^{Dharani Web Portal, strictiy in accordance} with law, as expeditiously^{as possible, preferably'within a period} of eight vreeks^{from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' duly} putting all tfre interested^{parties on notlce'}

¶29

Thr: miscellaneous^{petitionspending,} if any, shall^stand

¶30

closed^{'l'here shallbe} !9-oldg!-ao^lo-cilsLs-

¶31

Ass,sriRt![EcTStH \ //TRUE^COPY// secrtS{l)orrtcea

¶32

' i tffit,itfiffifiiiffiidffi^{il -'^}

¶33

¶34

9 9n"^{CC to Sri Kishore Rai,} Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two ccs to Gp for Revenue, t-tigh co'urt foithe state of rerangana at Hyderabad. [OUT1

¶35

Two CD Cofiies 9. One Spare Copy CHR

it t

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912021

ORDER

W.P.No.15900 of 2021

E STATA
0 4 0cI2021 (j:
ai
*
.1 .f)

¶42

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

¶43

)
w

Syed Ainuddin Arif v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Ainuddin Arif v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mandapally , Mangalli Ashok Vs Bharati Hollikeri

Mrs.Rozina Viran Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Gelli Jayaram Yadav Vs Bharathi Hollikeri

Mrs. Anushrce Soni Daga Vs State of Telengana and 4 Others

M. Preethi Phani Vs Syed Mudassir Nawaz

Shankahamuri Yadagiri Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others