The High Court of Hyderabad disposed of WP 1458 of 2008 filed by Kakatiya University, as infructuous because the University had complied with the Labour Court's order by reinstating a workman, rendering no further writ intervention necessary.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S1 r.o";,;,tAI!,3i 1f,!fury$iliAr HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SEVEf]TH DAY OF SEPTEIYBER
TWO THOUSATT,O erro rwE..ri".3r?"
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PE TITIO NNO : 1458 oF2 008
Betwee n:
Kakatiya University, rep. by its Registrar, Vidyaranyapuri, Warangal
AND
...PETITIONER
- lndustriala Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Warangal, Warangal District. , Rii ,',il:5'l:!bri"'Il, S:&"ff:i,",:i:,|r1lfiI:[?,,?.i,%.Jjl]V:,,i;:l:,,,,,
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article .-126 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavir fireolr"r"n',,'ir-," High court may be preased to pass order or orders o, ,ritl IT? .particutarfy one'in the nature of writ of Mandamus 9"9lrlfqthe order passed in ro r.rt.rso oi joo+ii.':o-z-zoo7 on the fire of Hon,bre lndustriar rribunar cum Labour court, warangJt'as aroitrary iregar, viorative of f undamental rights ouaranteed to the p"iit-n" Jnder Articre 1 4, i 9 (1 xg) of Constitution of lndia and set aside the same
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKATESHWARA RAO ADHt
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Gp FOR LABOUR
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRt. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
The Court made the following:
.tTIl| }tON'I]Lt'] SITI JUSTICEABHINAND KUN{AIISHAVILI f \' ll lT'PE 1'lTlONN 0s.l .158 <-t200tt
o t{l) E I{:
i. 1.,.'rllll.tlStelttllil''l ( orlli-tel llpl)c'tlillr tilr Llr'l l!'llt)lrll- r-r.ri.c.sitr!..i.ir(le!rthitt lhe pcritiorer-,lr'ersil) has reirtstlttccl respondentNo 2-rvorkman into service in compliance of the order dated 30.7.2007passed by the Labour Courtin I'DNo'150ol 2004 and inview of the same,the writ petitionhas become infructuous'
2.Inr.ielvolthesaidsubmission'thisCoudisoftheconsideled vierv thattire order dated 30.7.2007passed by the Laborrt court in L D.No.1 5 0o t200'1 has been con.rpliedwith by the petitioner- rLnivctsitlritttl itl vie*'ofllle sanle, no l'urther orclers need t'r be passed lr: this rrlrt 1.,,'tttir.rrl. lh," lrrit llctitiollis accorciirlgirclisrltissctlls inliuctuoit-s. 'oortlct ils to cosLS.
I)eLrding nrisccllaneouspetitions, ilanl'. shall sta|rdciismisscd
SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTI\NT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'
To,
Pm
SECTION OFFICER
1 . One CC to Sri. Venkateshwara Rao Adhi, Advocate tOpUCl 2. One CC to Sri. Kowturu pavan Kumar, Advocate tOpUCi '
tp
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0710912021
ORDER
,/, 1 rii: STAf t ori
I
lt il
30 S;??8tl ':)
I
WP.No.1458 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
e
\q
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ of mandamus can be issued in the facts of the case other than for fundamental rights
Kakatiya University
Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Warangal
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
