Petitioner withdrew a writ petition seeking investigation and prosecution for benami transactions against Respondents 5-11 under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 and Income Tax Act, 1961.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANORA RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 13236 OF 2019
Between:
Syed Luqman Abbas Razvi, S/o Syed Jaffer Hussain Razvi,Aged. 45 Yrs,Rl/o H.No. 22-2-300, Balsethy Keith, Noor Khan Bazaar, Charminar,Hyderabad, Occ. business.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to pass an appropriate Writ, orderor, direction more particularlyin the natureof a Wrlt of l,,4andamus directing the Respondents Ito 4 to conductan incisive and fair investigation relating to Benami Transactionsof the Respondents 5 to 11 mentioned in the Petitioners Complaint daled.12.06.20'19and consequently,to prosecute lhe Respondents 5 to 11 under section.53 and sec.54 of the Prohibitionof Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 and otherapplicable offences underthe Income Tax Act; 1961 . For the reasons statedin the accompanyingAffidavit, it is therefore
prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass an appropriate Writ, order or, direction for t\IONITORING the lnvestigation being conducted by the Respondents 1 to 4 relating to Benami Transactions of the Respondents 5 to 11 mentioned in the Petitioners Complaint dated. 12.06.2019, by this Honourable Court for ensuring an effective investigation and adjudication and consequential prosecutlon of the Respondents 5 to 11 herein.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an lnterim order directing the 4th Respondent to effect a provisional attachment of all the properties covered under Serial No. 1 to 22 of Para No. 2 (supra) by invoking Section. 24 (3) of the Prohibition of Benami Properties Transactions Act, 19gg pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC prayjng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order granting Police protection to the petitioner and the petitioner's family members pending disposal of the subject Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAKESH SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No. 1:SRl. S. JANARDHAN GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRl. B. NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 & I to 11: SRl. D. MADHAV RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 8:
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HONOURABLE SRI JIJSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETI TION No.13236 of 2019
ORDER: (per Sri Justice lv.t.S. Ram achundra Rao)
Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
4, Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
disutissecl. No cc.1s.
,TRUE COPY//
ASSrsrANr SD/- T.TIRUMALA i:)g DEVI
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 . One CC to Sri Rakesh Sanghi, Advocate [OpUC] 2. One CC to Sri. S Janardhan Goud, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. D. It4adhav Rao, Advocate (OPUC) 4, One CC to Sri. B. Narasimha Sarma, Advocate (OPUC)
PIV]
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/03/2021
ORDER
WP.No.13236 ol 2019
1 HE 9Tr.
t
?'.
oo) 24 mR m21 () rI
.L
t t) ,j c)-
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
6
)Il,i
Syed Luqman Abbas Razvi
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Syed Hameeduddin
Fatima Begum
Syed Viquaruddin
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
