Dismissed

M/s Sai Jeetesh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Aniket Sheth and Another

Telangana HC9 Mar 2021CRP/344/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court of Telangana order grants permission to withdraw a Civil Revision Petition (No. 344 of 2021) filed against an order in an execution petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, and pending matters are also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the petition; the petition and pending matters dismissed without costs.

M/s Sai Jeetesh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶7

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 344 OF 2 021

¶8

(Petition Under Section 115 of C.P.C aqainst the orders dated 04.02.2021 made in E.A.No.207 of 2018 in E.P.No.48 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad)

¶9

Between:

¶10

I//s Sai Jeetesh Constructions Pv,t. Ltd., Rep. by its tt4anaging Director, P.Sridhar, Flat No.3, Badham Apartments, Tarnaka, Secunderabad

¶11

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DHR

¶12

AND

¶13

'1 . Aniket Sheth S/o Sri Kishore Chandra Sheth, Occ: Business

¶14

Smt. Monica Sheth, Wio Aniket Sheth, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Housewife, All are Residents of H. No.5-4-154lA5, Ranigunj, Bus Stand, MG Road, Secunderabad.

¶15

,..PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/CLAIMANTS

¶16

Smt. Y.Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o Late Suryakanth Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Housewife,

¶17

Y.Chandrapal Reddy, S/o Yadi Reddy, Aged about 57^years, Occ. Business,

¶18

Y.Prakash Reddy, S/o Yadi Reddy, Aged about 61^years, Occ. Business,

¶19

Y.Nisha Reddy, D/o Late Suryakanth Reddy, Aged about 61^years, Occ. Housewife,

¶20

Y. Rajeev Reddy, S/o Late Suryakanth Reddy, Aged about 61 years, All are Resident at R/o H.No.3-4-769, Barkatptira, Hyderabad. (Respondents 3 to 7 are necessary parties to the C.R.P.)

¶21

...RESPONDENTS/JDRS

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the orders in EA.No.20712018 in EP.No.48/2015 on the file of I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G VASANTHA RAYUDU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents: ---

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶28

AND

¶29

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶30

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.344 OF 2021

¶31

ORDER: (Per Sri Justice M.S. Ratnachantlra Rao)

¶32

Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the revision

¶33

petition.

¶34

Permission is accolded.

¶35

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶36

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand

¶37

dismissed. N o costs.

¶38

,TRUE COPY//

¶39

SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶40

To, 1. The I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad ?. 9ne^{CC to Sri G. Vasantha RayJdu,} Advocaie lOpUCl 3. Two CD Cooies ks ,I}. cb.d

SECTION OFFICER

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910312021

ORDER

H E S TA )'4:
k
d 25 $4AH 2ozl o z
* D 'n
PA'I
+..

¶46

CRP.No.344 o12021

¶47

DISMISSING THE C.R.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶48

ffi

M/s Sai Jeetesh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Aniket Sheth and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Sai Jeetesh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Aniket Sheth and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmi N Nair Vs The State of Telangana

V Charan Vs The State of Telangana

Sruthi Nair Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Luqman Abbas Razvi Vs The Central Board of Direct Taxes Government of India and 10 others

Mokurala Srinivas Goud Vs Mounika

M.D., Apsddcf Ltd., Hyd Vs M.D., Tsddcf Ltd., Hyd and 8 Ot