Allowed

Bijili Sammakka v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Aug 2021WP/13145/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus relief against the detention of Bijili Mallaiah. The court set aside the impugned detention and confirmation orders and directed the release of the detainee forthwith if he is no longer required.

What did the court decide?

Set aside impugned detention order dated 04.10.2021 and consequential confirmation order. Directed set the detenu at liberty forthwith.

Bijili Sammakka Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Speciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST rWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 13145 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Biiili Sammakka, Wio. Mallaiah @ Mallesh, Aged^{45 years, Occ. Coolie,R/o.} T;dakalapudi Village, Tekulapally lvlandal,^{Bhadradri, Kothagudem} ?lT!$h,o*.*

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary^{to Government (POLL)'} General Administration^(Special Law and^{order) Department,Secretariat,} Hyderabad.

¶11

2 The Collector and District, lVlagistrate, Mahabubnagar,^Mahabubnagar Bb"iB?U,

¶12

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated ln the affidavit^{filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to} issue an order or direction more^{particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Habeas} Corpus directing the respondents to^{producethe detenue Bijili Mallaiah} @^tt4allesh S/o. Uppalaiah, aged 49^years, Occ. Coolie^{and Agriculture, R/o.Block No.16, Rajeev} Gruhakalpa, Thorrur village,^{Hayathnagarttlandal, Ranga Reddy District, N/o.} Tadakalapudi Village, Tekulapally l/andal, Bhadradri,^{Kothagudem District before this} Honorable Court and release him^{forthwith after declaring the order of detention vide} No.Rev/C1lLnOtOOO3l2O2l-C-section Daled.^{0410212021passedby the second} respondent and confirming the order of^{detention in G.O.Rt.No.921,Dated.} 1710412021 passed by ihe first respondent as^{highly arbitrary, bad, illegaland} voilative of principles of natural^justice

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.^{PRABHAKARREDDY}

¶14

Counsel for Respondents: SRI MANOJ^{KUMAR,AGP FORHOMEFOR} ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶15

IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS

¶16

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AI(THER

¶17

WRIT PETITION No.13145 OF 2O2L

¶18

ADVANCE ORDER:^(Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,l)

¶19

In the result, the Writ Petiti0n is allowed, The impugned detention order vide No.Rev/C1lLnO/0003/2021-C-Section, dated 04.02.2021, passed by the respondent I\1o.2, and the consequential confirmation order vide G.O.Rt.No.921, General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Deparl.ment, dated 17.O4.2021, passed by the Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, Government of Telangana, are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to set the detenu, namel-t Uijili l'lallaiah @^Mallesh, S/o.Uppalaiah, at^liberty forthwith,^{if he is no longer} required in any other criminal case

¶20

(Detailed order follows)

¶21

//TRUE COPY// ^l!l;]ffi!?Hli:"Ht[c=D SECTION OFFICER

¶22

To, 1 The Principal secretary^{to Go-vernment(POLL), General Administration(special} ia* ,no o?oeO^{Departinent, State of TeianganaSecrelari')t' Hyderabad-.} I ifr; il1";6;;nd-bistrict^{Magistrate,Maha-bubnagar, I\irarrabubnaoarDistrict} 3 iiiE 5rii"riiit".o"nt,-C"nt'."iF;i.;;,'Ch;;i;;;iri,^{Mtabnatvalkajsiri District (Bv} Special Messenger) 4. oie-Cb to Sri P^{Frabhakar Reddv Advocate[O-PUC]} . 5. i*" cc.'iJ cP^{For Home, nignbourt for th6 State of Te angTq'IOUT]} .^, ,-, 6. Two CCs to the^{Advocate General, High court for the stale oI lelangana.LUUrl} 7. Two CD Copies B. One Spare^coPY IVBC

¶23

HIGH COURT

¶24

DATIID: 2310812021

¶25

.(HE s l'ArF
<br>23 AUG20?! J.r)
,t,, +
t ot.3p :f c'
::_/2

¶26

ADVI\NCE ORDER

¶27

WP.No.13145 of 2021

¶28

ALLOWING OF THE WIIIT^PETITION

¶29

WIT}{OUT COSTS

Bijili Sammakka v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijili Sammakka v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Rajashekar Buggaveeti Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd.

Arcot Rajya Laxmi Vs State Bank of India

Mohd. Azharuddin Vs Mr. K. John Manoj

Smt. Bijju Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Dasari Sammakka Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Angadi Uma Vs The State of Telangana and another