High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of a notice and injunction against an auction as infructuous, based on counsel's submission that the cause does not survive for adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEA' RAJASHEKERREDDY AND THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO:'15598 0F 202',1
Between:
Arcot Raiva Laxmi, D/o.Arcot Kannabhiran, Aged 63 years,Occ: Household, ii/;. ii.i'16. 1rn-zdras,Motilal Nagar Begum[et' secunderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe cirCUmstanCeSstatedrntheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighcourtmaybepleaSedto issue a Writ, Orderor direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaringthe notice Dated7 t6t2O21 issuedby the Respondents'1 and 2 hereinasillegal,arbitrary,nullandvoidandforaconsequentialdirectiontothe Respondentstodropallfurtherproceedingspursuanttothenoticeda|ed71612021. IA NO: 10F 2021
PetitionunderSectionlslCPcprayingthatinthecircumstanCeSstatedinthe affidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtorestrainthe respondents 1and 2herein from conductingauction of the house bearing No. H.No. 1-11-252149,ArcotHouse, MotilalNagar' Begumpet' Secunderabad, pursuanttothenoticedatedT-6.2021pendingdisposa|oftheaboveWritPetition Counsel for thePetitioner:SRl.M.V' SURESH
Counsel forthe Respondents:NONE APPEARED
The Court madethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER ITEDDY AND HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKT}IER
Writ Petition No.15598 OF 2O21
ORDERi@er Hon'ble Srt Justice A.Raiasheker Reddv)
Sri M,V.Suresh, learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and as such no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
I
SDIR. KARTHIKEYAN ASSII}TANT RE TRA //TRUE COPY//
SECTION O ICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri. M.V. Suresh,Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CD Copies 3. One Spare Copy CHR TP
*--
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1810812021
STAT€
1
ol ,,e
L., 0gsEPz$21
*
(:!
ORDER
W.P.No.15598 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
t9, a
Di
o\
0)^<br>
Arcot Raiva Laxmi
State Bank of India
State Bank of India Assets Recovery Agency
A. Rajasheker Reddy
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
