Dismissed

P. Prabhaker and another v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC5 Mar 2021WP/1273/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition and civil stay petition, filed by a detenue regarding execution of GPA and SPA for property, were closed without costs after the High Court recorded that the detention order had been revoked, redressing the petitioner's grievance.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed by recording the submission that the petitioner's grievance was redressed by the revocation of the detention order.

P. Prabhaker and another Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original J urisd iction)

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 1273 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

P. Prabhaker, S/o. Esthariah @ lstharaiah, Age. 47 Years, Occ. Business, presently at Jail R/o. Villa No. 12, Sri adithya Royal Palm, Shaikpet, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

¶9

Smt. Saritha, W/o. Prabhaker, Age. 40 Years, Occ. Partner in Ketrish Developer, (partnership Firm), R/o. Villa No. 12, Sri Adithya Royal Palm, Shaikpet, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, ( General Administration Department ), (Law and Order), Secretariat at Hyderabad

¶13

2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl Secretary, ( Home Department ), Secretariat at Hyderabad.

¶14

3 The Director General Of Police (Prisats), Telangana state, at lr/alkapeta , Hyderabad.

¶15

4 The Superintendent of Jails Cherlapally Central Prison, at Cherlapally , Medchal I/alkajigiri' District

¶16

...RES'.NDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF IVANDATVUS or any other appropriate Writ, directing the respondents mainly the 4th respondent to consider the representation Dated. 181112021 and 191112021 made by the legal counsel on behalf of the petitioner No.1 / detenue to the 4th respondent for execution of GPA, SPA for property pertain to the petitioner No.1 to allow the detenue for put his signatures on the certain documents to be executed i.e. GPA /SPA in Cherlapally Central^jail by SRO Uppal Staff for his own property narrated in the representation Dated. 181112021 and 191112021 .

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents mainly the 4th respondent to allow the deteneu /petitioner NO.1 to put his signatures in certain documents GPA/SPA brought by the $RO Uppal Staff for the detenue's own property as per the representation Dated. 181112021 and 191112021 made by the legal counsel on behalf of the petitioner No.1 / detenue,pending disposal Of WP.

¶20

¶21

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC prayjng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents mainly the 4th respondent to allow the deteneu /petitioner NO.1 to put his signatures in certain documents GPA/SPA brought by the SRO Uppal Staff for the detenue's own property in addition to the representation Dated. 1B-1-2021 & 19-1-2021 made by the legal counsel those are i) Btock -C, Flat NO. 30S.ii) Btock -C, Flat NO. G-1 , iii) Block -A, Flat NO. G-6,iv) Btock -A, Ftat NO. G-7:, v) Block -A, Ftat NO. G-9:, vi) Block -A; Flat NO. G-107;, vii) Btock -C, Flat NO. G-B & viii) Btock -A, Flat NO. 507.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI G. L. NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI S. RAM MOHAN, AGp FOR HOME

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^K.LAKSHMAN

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.1273 of2O2L

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Sri S.Ram Mohan, learned Assistant^Government Pleader for Home, has filed G.O.Rt.No.503,^{dated 03.03.202 1,} issued by the Principal Secretary^{to the Government,General} Administration Department, wherein it^{is statedthat the} Government has dul1, considered^{the opinion and report of} the Advisory Board and^{revoked the detention order in respect} of the petitioner herein under^{Sectionl2(2\ of the Telangarra} Prevention of Dangerous^{Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits,} Drug Offenders, Goondas,^{Immoral TrafficOffenders,Land} Grabbers, Spurious^{Seed Offenders, InsecticideOffenders,} Fertilizer Offenders,^{Food AdulterationOffenders, Fake} Document Offenders,^{Explosive Substances Offenders,Arms} Offenders, Cyber Crime^{Offenders and While Collar or} Financial Offenders Act,^{1986 and directed for release of the} detenu.

¶29

In view of the^{same, learned counselfor the petitioner} would submit that^{the grievance of the petitioner is redressed} and sought to^{close the Writ Petition.}

¶30

Recording the^{sairl submission, and placing the saidGO} on record, this Writ^{Petitionisclosed'Miscellaneous}

¶31

¶32

¶33

petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand

¶34

closed. No order as to costs.

¶35

SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' 6D SECTION OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

One CC to Sri G. L. Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for General Administration, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶38

Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad tourl

¶39

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:05/03/2021

ORDER

WP.No.1273 of 2021

f;
x.Irt,.
20 HAn 2021

¶47

CLOSING THE WP. WITHOUT COSTS.

¶48

%" @

P. Prabhaker and another v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Prabhaker and another v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintha Uma Devi Vs The State of Telangana Rep by its P.P

Toddy Taper Co-Op.Society,Rep.by President, Mahabubnagar. Vs the Proh.and Ex.Superintendent,Mahabubnagar Dist.

Suresh Kumar Reddy Vs the State of Telangana

Manupati Shiva Krishna Vs State of Telangana

Chittakala Satish Vs Smt. Spandana, And Anothe

K.Nirmala Vs State of Telangana and another