The High Court of Telangana dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings as infructuous because the trial regarding the compounding offence was concluded by the trial court.
Criminal Petition No.269 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OFIV1ARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
CRIMI NAL PETITION NO: 269 OF2018
Between:
suresh Kumar Reddylr/ledipally,S/o. tv. Prathap Reddy, occ._Business,^originally Aio:-AZWItqq, KaveriHiils, - Hyderabad, Wrong Address State in Complaint: Rio. Plot No.776, Road No.45, JubileeHills, Hyderabad
,..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
AND
.. Respondent
...RESPONDENT/ Defacto Complainant
Petition under section482 of cr.P.c praying thatin the circumstancesstated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds ofcriminalPetition, the High courtmay be pleased to quash the above case i.e., ccNo.420 oI 2017 on the file of Hon'ble lV Additional Chief lvletropolitan Magistrate,Nampally againstthe Petitionersherein.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminalPetition, the High courtmay be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings, includingthe appearanceof the Petitionersin c.c.No.420 of 2017 onthe file of Hon'blelv Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally,pending disposal ofthe abovecriminal Petition,in the interestof justice.
This Petition coming on forhearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of crjminal Petitionand upon hearing the arguments of Sri U. Shanthi Bhushan Rao, Advocate for the Petitionerand the Public Prosecutoron behalfof the Respondent No.'1 and None appearedfor the Respondent No. 2 '
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMIN AL I' ETITION No.269 of 2018
ORDERT
Sri U.Shanthi Bhushan Rao, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the trial Court i.e. the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Nampally, has concluded the trial in C.C.No.420 of 2017 and in view of the same, this criminal petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-K.ONESIM
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Gt
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Lgbr
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410312021
lo 24 MAn 2021
ORDER
CRL.P.No.269 of 2018
DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
-y Lel'3 0
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable when the trial has concluded by the Trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Kumar Reddy
The State of Telangana
Justice K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
