The High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging eviction from foot paths and acceded to the request, dismissing the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted for withdrawal; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR IHE 57 rsp;; i;' 6l.fifj .l,.r.f}.nflTfA T HyD ERA BA D
ITIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE rwo rHousAlo nrvo iweruiv"dile-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO:'12654 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the HighCoudmay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction morepadicularly one in thenature ofWrit of Itrlandamus, declaring the action of the 4th and SthRespondentsin trying to evict/remove thepetitioners from not doing thePetty Businesssituated at Kunavaram Road, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem Districtin the foot path without giving any notice opportunity to thepetitioners by disturbinglivelihoodof the petitionersis highly illegal, arbitrary and against theprinciples of naturaljustice and alsoviolative of Articles 1a, 19(g) and 21 of Constitution of lndia andconsequently directthe 4th and 5th respondents not to interfere with thepeaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners Petty Businesses situated at KunavaramRoad,Bhadrachalam, Bhad radri Kothagudem District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighcourt maybe pleased to directthe 4th and Sth respondents not to interfere with thepeaceful possession and enloyment of the petitioners Petty Business situated atKunavaramRoad, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District,pending disposalof the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. P V KRISHNAMACHARY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ& RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRl.G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FORZPPIMPP Counsel for the Respondent No. 5:GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATHGOUD
WRIT PETITION No.l2654of 2021
ORDER:
Counselfor petitionersseekspermission for withdrawalof writ
petition, with liberlyto take steps in accordancewith [aw'
Permission is accordedand the writ petitionis dismissedas
withdrawn, grantinglibertyto the petitioners to takeappropriate steps
in accordance with law.No orderas to costs.
Pending miscellaneousapplications, if any, shallstandclosed'
SD/. K,VENKAIAH
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Gt
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PM .*--
HIGHCOURT
DATED:04t0612021
ORDER
WP.No.12654of 2021
1 L1 E s 14
15 Jl'il 202'
.* *
Dismissing theWP As withdrawn Without costs.
b ,
\k
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Nalla Venkateswara Rao
Smt. Thotamalla Satya Priya
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Prl Secretary
The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District
The District Panchayat Officer, Kothagudem
The Bhadrachalam Grampanchayat, Rep by its Secretary
T. AMARNATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
