Allowed the petitioner to withdraw a Writ Petition seeking mandamus regarding building permission and third-party claims without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to pursue other remedies; petitions dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH ('i::LliifF.:'##,IL,l';o'uo,o
,.o16"i,185.'^K[T,yr.ffifiroevrcreent
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRITpETITION NO: 10269 OF 2021 Between:
Vedere Ashok Redcly, S/o^ Late V.Ranga Reddy,_ age 5g years, Occ. Retired 5:lill*"nroH r{ii+-s-s,-aiiplri! Vi,ffi,xattansur Mandat, Natgonda
AND
...PET|T|ONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a suitable writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in insisting any Registrated Document, before sanction of building permission plan and not considering the partition and family settlement or later on, while constructing building and not to examine any third party claims without any order from comptent authority over tifle of the petitioners owned and possessed propertys construction on the basis assumptions and presumptions
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support bf the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction against the respondents from interfereing with the construction being carried out as per the plan submitted/uploaded to the departmental site on 0210212021 for raising a new house of 1766 SFT in 164.09 Sq. Meters area in old delapidated premises of H.No.4-59 of admeasuring 23 guntas of Gramkantamland, at Aitipamla Village, Kattangur Mandal, Nalgonda District pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. LAKNA REDDY
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
& RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY
SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: ORDER
ATHGOUD THE HON'BL ESRIJUSTICET. WRITPETITION No,Lo2690F 2O2L
oRDER:
1 When thematter iscalled'learned counsel for the petitionerseekspermissionof the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition withliberty to pursue the remedies available to the petitioner. Permissionis accorded'
2 Giving theliberty as sought for, the Wrlt Petition rs dismissedas withdrawn.No order as to costs'
3 Miscellaneouspetitions, if any,sha1l also stand
dismissed.
SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY//
\
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 one CC to SriY Lakna Reddy AdvocatetOPlCl, 2 rwo ccs to Gp ro|.ern'IfrJ/u?ili"&'R,j;iDJJelopment, Hish court for the
\
HIGH COURT.!
DATED: 2810412021
-{ 'rt s TA
oL) 0 .l,l JUt{ ?0Il
t
P,1,-f
ORDER
WP.No.10269 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
$ WITHOUT COSTS br</sup>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should grant permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vedere Ashok Redcly
Commissioner of panchayath Raj and Rural Development, T.S.
District Coilector, Coilecirate oifiC;, N
District panchyath Officer, Naiqon;; disirrci
Mandal Panctryath Officer, Kattangur, Nalqonda District
Hanchavath secratary, Grampanchyath, Aitpamla Village, Kattangur lvandal, Natgonda diitrict
T. AMARNATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
