Dismissed

M/s. Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Telangana HC22 Apr 2021ITTA/73/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to withdraw an appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act to settle the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions are closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the appeal to settle under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

M/s. Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY,^{THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL} - -TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO} AND THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR}

¶4

t.T.T. A. NO :73O^{F 2007}

¶5

lncomeTaxTribunalAppea|underSection260-4ofthelncomeTaxAct,against the order of^{the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench.A, Hyderabadin ITA} No.92,lHyd/2004^{for assessmentyear 2oo1-2002dated 30/08/2006 preferred against} theorderoftheCommissioneroflncomeTaxAppeals-ll,Hyderabad,AppealNo.lTA 0551/ClT(AyO3-04^{dated lOlOBl2OO4' preferredagainst the Order of the Dv'} Commissioner^{of lncome Tax Circle-1(1 ) PAN/GlRNo AABCA71 59A}

¶6

Between:

¶7

N,4/s. Ad Aqe^{Outdoor Advertising PrivateLimited ' 2461A'Road No'12"trillA Colony'} Hl-.ii #j'^fi il; [fi^;;;brd,,;p:' "b; Ytt Eieiutiue D i recto r S ved lrteq ua r' "llir r r r.o*,

¶8

AND

¶9

Deputy Commissioner^{of lncome Tax'Circle 1(1)' Hyderabad'}

¶10

...RESPONDENT

¶11

For the Appellant^{: Dr. N.R'SIVASWAMY' Advocate}

¶12

For the Respondent^{: SRI K'RAJI REDDY' SENIOR SC FORl'T'}

¶13

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶14

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶15

AND

¶16

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶17

ITTA.No.73 of 2007

¶18

JUDGMENT: (Per Si Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)

¶19

Counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo dt.O9.04.2021 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeai to settle the matter with the authorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O.

¶20

Granting permission as sought for, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶21

)f Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if

¶22

any, sha_li stand closed.

¶23

//TRUE COPYII

¶24

Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR (:l{b

¶25

SECTIOI"I.--.OFFICER

¶26

¶27

The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A' Bench, Hyderabad. 2 One CC to Dr. N.R.Siva Swamy, Advocate (OPUC)

¶28

2 One CC to Sri K.ffaji Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)

¶29

Two CD Copies

*_-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210412021

ORDER

1 sr.q ,rt'
(
t;<br>.) !l
t$11
(.) 01
ji/2tl
-).
ar

¶36

ITTA.No.73 ot 2007

¶37

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA.

¶38

%v-.,
@)

M/s. Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. v.Ravinder Rao Vs The Superintendent of Central Tax

M/s Sai Venkateshwara Industries Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Dr. H. Anuradha Vs H. Gangadhar

M/s. Aishwarya Builders and Developers Vs M/s. Vigna Farms

M/s. Aishwarya Builders and Developers Vs Mohd. Ameer Ali and 14 others

M/s. Aishwarya Builders and Developers Vs Mohd. Ameer Ali and 14 Others