Disposed

Telangana State Road Transportation Corporation, v. P. Ravinder

Telangana HC9 Mar 2021WA/99/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The dispute concerned collection of GST along with monthly licence fees. By consent, the court disposed of the appeals and pending applications, confirmed the interim orders in the appeals, and directed the parties to appear before the Single Judge for fixing arguments in the pending writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Interim orders in the appeals confirmed; parties directed to appear before the Single Judge for fixing a date for arguments in the pending writ petitions.

Telangana State Road Transportation Corporation, Vs… — GST and Indirect Tax | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH^{GOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} TUESDAY^{,Tr-rtrNilNTHDAY oF I'IARCH} et'ro^TWENTYoNE *uo '*ou=-or'ro

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE^{THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI} rHE HoNouRABLE^{sRl i)t?'ttB',IJAYSENREDDY}

¶4

71.3^{74, 385.3} 87. 39^8, 99.48^{3, 485.} W486RIT 4^APPEAL I 49^NOS: 4⁷¹⁰ 6 50^.99.3 572⁶⁹⁷⁷³ 7 6 772 8990F²⁰¹⁹

¶5

WA NO:^{710 0} F 2019

¶6

Writ Appeal^{under clause 15 of the LettersPatentpreferred against the order} w^p t'to'^{i+sas of 2019 on the file of} dated 2s-ol-2olspassedⁱⁿ 'n*"",t""iiotiiit the High^Court

¶7

""T"?lir"n"na state Road^{Transport-corporation} ,Rep^{b'v its Vice chairmanand} tr/anagi ng^{Di rector' o'!a i''?'-"li'ttrtushberaoad'Hyd erabad}

¶8

1. The Divisional^{N4anager' Telangana} ^State^{Road TransportCorporation'} ' vir"r-rriro"rsa r Divisionl I'4a habu bna^{garDi strict'}

¶9

...APPELLANTS

¶10

AND G. Venkatesh.^{sio G. Narasimhulu. Aged about 31^years Licence Holder of Two} rlo a3 in^{N'4ahabubnagarBus} wheeler Station. lVlahabubnagar Parkinq^{stand-ll District} '.'oi;;i;;;{iurr

¶11

.., RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶12

IA NO:¹ 0F²⁰¹⁹

¶13

PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit^{filed in .uppott ot tfre peiition, 1f'e Uigf' Court may} F..ntu.*O^to rr.p".Jlfl"^{order dated )e.Oi.ZOlepassed in l A No l of 2019in W'P'No.14585 of} 2019 in the interest^{of justice.}

¶14

Counsel for the^{Appellants:SRl.B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶15

Counsel for the^{Respondent: SRl.C' RAMACHANDRA RAJU}

¶16

WRIT AP PEAL^N o^{:99 OF 2019}

¶17

writ Appeal under^{clause15 of the Letters Patentfiledagainstthe order dated} 21-01-2019^{pa'ssed in W.P.No. 513 of 2019 on the file of the HighCourt'}

¶18

Between:

¶19

1-TelanoanaStateRoadTranSpofiationCorporation,representedbyitsViceChairfian and t,4anaqing^{Director, Bus Bhavan,[t'4usheerabadHyderabad'}

¶20

1. Divisional [,4anager,^{Karimnagar Division,Telangana stateRoad Transpodation} Corporation

¶21

.,.APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶22

<.--1-'

¶23

AND

¶24

Ig?,i#;l?,!,?v,fl^{3::gi:f,lf il.,:!Ti;:Jl?,3f;Bj..,,,,:,fl} a::l,ix,.#1.

¶25

...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER

¶26

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶27

Petition under Section 151..cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in ll:_-ifli9?,rit^{fited in support or tne peii,o'n,} in"';igh Court may be pteased to ;:?ffilir,::ri1%.i%%:,.o", dated 21'.1.201e'p;";"J 6y the Ld. sintru j,ig;in w,it

¶28

IA NO: 2 0F 2019

¶29

Petition under Section 1Sl Cp C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peti tion, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders passed in W.A. No . 99 of 2019 dated 2SlO3l2O19 un_till further o rde rs.

¶30

Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. KARAN TALWAR

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. M. AJAY KUMAR

¶32

WP NO: 371 OF 2019

¶33

writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated04-04-2019passed in lA.No. 1of 2o1g inw.p.No 7143of 2olgonthefiteof the High Court.

¶34

Between:

¶35

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and It/lanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶36

The Divisional Engineer, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Khammam Division, Khammam District. Telangana State.

¶37

The Depot Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Khammam District, Telangana State.

¶38

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶39

AND

¶40

1 l/d. lVinhajuddin Kouser, S/o lqbaluddin, Aged 42^years, Occ. Business, Fl/o.Jublipura, Khammam, Khammam District.

¶41

,,,,RESPONDENTSiPETITIONER

¶42

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶43

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS

¶44

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶45

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the at{idavit^{filed in support of the petition,the High courtmaybe^pleaseclto} ,rapaal"atOaia^{putttOin lA No lof 2019 in w P'No 7143 ot 20.1e' dated} 04.04.201e

¶46

04.04.201e Counsel^{for the Appellants:SRl'B MAYUR REDDY'sc FoR rsRrc}

¶47

Gounsel^{{or the RespondentNo. 1: sRt' NARGI'AFSHAN KHAN}

¶48

Counsel^{{or the Respondent No' 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶49

¶50

¶51

WAN^O:3 OF 2⁰¹⁹ Writ^{APPealunder cla} il::^; ffl^{JT,h"J'i[ iff i,'i3i?:l'i:1tr:lT $i;;} aated^{Og.O+.2019Passed lA'} Court.

¶52

Between:--',^{-i",unnuna-state} Road J[1U%:['"SB:J3XR,::Ri,,:'.J:?J':3 EX35[3:r:* , HJlti:.n":jlTH;l";^{ili;'waransarRegion'waransarDistrict'reransana} State. Hanamkonda,^Warangal District^BusStation,

¶53

1. The Depot^{Manager'.TSRTC'} District,^{Telanganastate}

¶54

Between:--',

¶55

...APPELLANTS

¶56

ANDI sri Stall Gudise No.34^{Vijender. S/o (Xerox shop, S^ri} "t'ti'i'lliv^tr,4ailaiah, "t"^{Aseg q!.oy! i-At Di't'ict q5^y9rr. Bus Station occ. Hanamkonda'License Holder'} R/o H.HNo.1-40.^{r"xrarrrpJilli:;ffi;i;;.i,v;ransal DistrictTelansanastate'}

¶57

'^{... RESPONDENTiPETITIONER}

¶58

2 The State of^{Telangana.Repby its Principal Secretary' Transport Department'} Telangana^{Secretariat,HYderaDao}

¶59

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶60

IA NO:^{1 0F 2019}

¶61

Petition under^{Sectlon 151 CPC prayingthat.in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{filed in suppln} "i'fl'.r"^{p"iittn'ih" Hiqn Court may !11]laseato} suspend^{orders passedii"l.n.rrro.r'of2o1g in w.P.tto. 7374 of 2019, dated} 09.04.2019 and^{pass such other orderor orders may deem fit and properin the} circumstances^{of the case.}

¶62

Counsel for the^{Appellants:SRl.B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶63

Counsel forthe^{Respondent No. 1: SRl. MIRMUKARRAM ALI}

¶64

Counsel for the^{Respondent No' 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶65

WRIT APPEAL NO:³ 85 0F²⁰¹⁹

¶66

writ Appeal under clause^{15 of the Letters Patent preferredagainst the order} dated.O9.04.2d19,^{passed in lA.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.7409 of 2019 on the file of the} High Court.

¶67

Between:

¶68

Telangana State Road Transport Corporatior,^{Rep, by its Vice Chairmanand} tt4anaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road,^{[r,4usheerabad,Hyderabad.}

¶69

The Regional lVanager, TSRTC, Warangal Region, Warangal District. Telangana State.

¶70

The Depot lt4anager, TSRTC,District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶71

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDE NTS

¶72

AND

¶73

Sri C.H. Sudakar, S/o. [t4anikyam, Aged about 37 years, Occ. License Holder, Stall Space (Pan Shop Stall), At District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Rio H.No. 7-1-1311A, Laxmipuram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶74

. ..RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶75

.- Y-

¶76

2 #i,:J:fr"{#l#3?.'r},f,g;#X'^{Principarsecretary, rransport} Department

¶77

..,RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶78

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶79

. -Petition^{under Section15i CpCpraying} that in the crrcumstances stated in suspend ll:^-iflig.yit the^fired orders^{in support} oassed^or in^tre f.n.frfo.fliOrS^peitro'n, ir,u'"Higl..r in 'W.p.wo.Co urt may be pleased to 7409 of 2019, dated 09.04.2019 in the interest of justice.

¶80

Counsel for the Appeilanrs:SRt. B MAYUR REDDY (SC FOR TSRTC)

¶81

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. MIR MUKARRAM ALI

¶82

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Gp FOR TRANSPORT

¶83

WA NO: 387 oF 2019

¶84

. writ Appear under crause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 09-04-2019 passed in lA.No. 112019 in wp. No. 7378 of zo19 on the fite of the High Court.

¶85

Between:

¶86

Telangana_state Road rransport corporation, Rep. by its Vice chairman and.Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, iVusireeraOiO ffvJeraflOl

¶87

2 The Regional IVanager, TSRTC, Warangal Region, Warangal District. Telangana State.

¶88

The Depot Manager, TSRTC, District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶89

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDE NTS

¶90

AND

¶91

Sri Jangli Raju, S/o. Sailu, Aged about 40^years, Occ. License Holder, Stall Space (Cool Drinks Business), At District Bus Station, Hanamakonda, R/o H.No 7 -1 -21 4, Laxmipurarn, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶92

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶93

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its Principal Secretary, TransportDepartment,} Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶94

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶95

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶96

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto} suspend the orders^{passed in 1 .A.No.1i2019in w.P.No. 7378 of 2019,dated} 09.04.2019 in the^{interest of justice and pass}

¶97

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl'^{B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶98

Counsel for the Respondent^{No. 1: SRl. MIRMUKARRAM ALI}

¶99

Counsel for the Respondent^{No' 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶100

9--

¶101

WA^{NO:398 OF 2019}

¶102

?f:Hl fr^{t'i .l.,i-'} w rit^{Ap p ea,,} "9 :,.:5 l, ;,"n 1i $,1ff i;lE :1 !sl"J: ,l fi:" 0S-04-2019 Passed^{in lA [r}

¶103

¶104

Between: ' L"lfl!3flt"?,'3i?"I811Jlx[:en:Hr"3'Ei,l3x'{;"T:R'iJ'ilJLSr'Y':S E}39[3:'?rro Warangal^{Region' WarangalDistrict Telangana}

¶105

1. The^{Regionurrvrunug"'i ii*'"'} u. iLt"r"o,^{Itilanager' TSRTC'District Bus Station' Hanamkonda'Warangal} - District, Telangana State'

¶106

Between:

¶107

,APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶108

AND 1 Sri Gudise^{Vijender.. S/o Sri Nilallaiah,Aged about 35,years. occ' License} Holder. Stall^{No.55(General sil;;;;ti Snacr eart A[District Bus Station'} Hanamkonda,^{Rro H.nNo.r_+"g*i![riijrrprr.l"io.Atmat<ur.warangalDistrict,} Telangana^State.

¶109

.....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶110

The State of^{Telangana..ReP} by its Principal^{Secretary, Transport Department'} Telangana^{SecretariatHYdera} bad.

¶111

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶112

lA NO:¹ o F 2019

¶113

Petitionundersectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed^{in support of the peiition, the High Court maybe^ pleasedto} suspend the orders^{passedin l.A.No1/2019 in W P No 7436 of 2019' dated} 09.04.20'19 in the^{interest of justice}

¶114

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl.^{B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶115

Counsel for the Respondent^{No. 1: SRl. MIRMUKARRAM ALI}

¶116

Counset for the Respondent^{No' 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶117

WA NO: 399 OF 2019

¶118

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the^{Letters Patent preferred against the order} dated 09-04-2019 in WP.No7388 of 2019^{on the file of the High Court.}

¶119

Between:

¶120

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Represented by its^Vice Chairman, and lVlanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, lVlusheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶121

The Regional manager, TSRTC, Warangal Region, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶122

The Depot l,4anager, TSRTC,, District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State,

¶123

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶124

AND

¶125

Sri C.H.Sudhakar, S/o l/anikyam, Aged about 37 years, Occ. License Holder, Stall No,10 (Fruit Juice Stall), At District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Rl/o. H.No. 7^-1 -131 I A, Laxmipuram, Hanmakonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶126

....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶127

2 The State of Telanoana. Re Principal secretary, Transport Department,

¶128

tetangana Secretaiiat, HrdS;rb#Xt

¶129

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶130

IA NO: 10F 201 I

¶131

Petition under section 151 .cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the- affidavit. fired in support or *re peirtil'n, irru -Higr-, court may be preased to suspend orders passed in r.A.No.r' of 2oi9 in w.p.ruo. zsee'"i zdisl"aateo 09.04.2019

¶132

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶133

Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1:SRI. MIR MUKARRAM ALI

¶134

Counsel forthe Respondent No. 2: Gp FOR TRANSPORT

¶135

WA NO: 483 OF 2019

¶136

. writ Appeal under crause 1b of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 16-04-2019 passed in lA.No. 1 ol 2019 in wp No. 7879 of zols6nthe file of the High Court.

¶137

Between:

¶138

Telangana_State Road Transport Corporation,, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, MusheeraUaO, UyOerJOaO.

¶139

The.Regional Engineer,, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal Region, Warangal District. Telangana State.

¶140

The Deqot I,4anager,, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶141

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶142

AND

¶143

Sri C.H. Sudhakar,, S/o. IVlanikyam, Aged about 37 years, Occ. License Holder, Stall Space (Patanjali Store), At City Bus Station, Hanamkonda, R/o. H.No.7-1'1 31/A, Laxmipuram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶144

,..,RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶145

The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶146

.,.RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶147

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶148

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may} be^pleasedto suspend the order dated 16.04.2019^passed in l.A.No.1^{of 2019 in W.P.No.7879 of} 2019 in the interest of^justice.

¶149

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶150

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. VLADIMEER KHATOON

¶151

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶152

--'y-

¶153

W NO:4^{850F20 19}

¶154

Writ APPeal^{under clause1} :,":i13,';ll1i^{E ffi T f,,;':i';s, 3'"11*'ii" :ltf:} aateo.ds.o+.id19,^{Passedin lA No} High Court.

¶155

""T"ilir.nrna state Road^rransport -c^orporation -Reo^{bv its Vice chairmanand} dit;";""'^{iTC cross nouo'Ifi'l'ilt""rabad'Hyderabad}

¶156

Manasing^Director, 'ft

¶157

1. The^{Regionat Manager, TelanganaState RoadTransport Corporation' Warangal} ' n""gib;-wjrangal District Telangana state

¶158

The Depot^{Manager'Telangana State Road Transp]?rt'Corporation DistrictBus} " sirilo nl"r-rin miko"noi,Wa ra"n ga t oi st'i"t' Telanga^{na State}

¶159

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶160

AND

¶161

1 Sri i,irili lVd. Ghouse Sirrr^{Space-irruit Pasha. S/o. Sabir Pasha' Aged LriIJ"sirrrl Ai bisirict lbout sus Statibn, 35 vears' Hanamkonda,Occ' Licence} Hi,jl ri.'r'r" snis7,^{iauourcoronv,W"'ngalDistrict' Telangana State'}

¶162

..,RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶163

2 The State of Tetangana,^{Repby its Principal Secretary' Transport Department'} Telangana Secretaiiat,^HYderabad

¶164

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶165

IA NO: 1 0F 2019

¶166

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto} suspend the order dated^{09.04.20'19 passed in lA.No.l of 2019 in w.P.No.7416of} 201 9 in the interest of^justice.

¶167

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl.^{B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC}

¶168

Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1:SRl.^{MIR MUKARRAM ALI}

¶169

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶170

WA NO: 486 OF 2019

¶171

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^preferred against the order dated 09-04-20'19 passed in lA.No. 1 o'f 2019 in WP No. 7375 of 2019 on the file of the High Court

¶172

Between:

¶173

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and l,4anaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, lt,4usheerabad, Hyderabad

¶174

The Regional lt4anager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal Region, Warangal District. Telangana State.

¶175

The Depot Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, District Bus Station, Hanmakonda, W1-1 Depot, District, Telangana State

¶176

...APPELLANTS/RESPON DENTS

¶177

AND

¶178

1 A. Praveen Kumar, S/o. Sri Padmanabham, Aged about 37 years, Occ. License Holder Stall No.12 (Soda and Cool Drinks), At District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Rl/ o. D.No.1-B-94, 1st Floor, Sai Nagar, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶179

....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶180

r-+b^(--

¶181

2 TheStateofTelangana,Rep.byitsPrincipalsecretary'TransportDepartment' Telangana Secretariat,^HYderabad

¶182

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶183

IA NO : 1 0F²⁰¹⁹

¶184

Petition under^{Section1 51 CPC prayingthat. in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{filed in ,rppltol tf," p"iition, -tr," Higf,Court may..b1pleasedto} susoend the^{order OateOO-S.'0+:.Z0iSiu.r"ain LA.N;.1 of 2019in W.P.No 7375 of} 2019 in the^{interest of justice'}

¶185

Counsel^{for the Appellants:SRl'B MAYUR REDDY' SC FOR TSRTC}

¶186

Counsel^{for the Respondent No' 1: SRI' MIR MUKARRAM ALI}

¶187

Counsel^{for the Respondent No' 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶188

WAN^{O: 487OF2019}

¶189

Writ Appeal^{under clause15 of the Lglqtt lllunt filed againstthe order dated} 15-04-201e^{passedin lA' N::t"il;iri'itwi r'r"'zB7'2 or 2o1e-onthe rile of the Hish} Court.

¶190

Between:---,^{-r"'unn,,"il919} 5ffilJ;11T,f[-"S'Ei,l3l"i;,IiR;,,P,"J:1,Y:S^3135[3:o:"0

¶191

,ffi H"-i",*#ifrii;"1[#U.?a',"#"'rransportcorporation'warangar o n^{Di st ri ct B u s}

¶192

. ff : il,:.,^{ffi :fl I} :l ;^''1fi ,^;i#"r*l;3"d1,,"":'o "'ti Station^{HanumaKonoa'vvdrdr rvqr}

¶193

"'A,,ELLANTS/RESP.NDENTS

¶194

AND '' -^ ^n, 'hnrrt i7^{vears' Occ License Holder'} 1 s^ri c^{H s u d h a k a r} $% ll,",S #ilhTliiffi l:lH Jl.8l i:Xllf ;, RB'l ilil:rl?1t?iol"xii,ipiil'il i ".,""^{i' nL," ro n'} State ,...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶195

bvits Principal^{Secretary' Transport Department'}

¶196

2 +:i" il?f,%^{l:13{},?ilI ii ft?$,} bad

¶197

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶198

IANo: 10E²⁰¹⁹

¶199

1 51 CPC^{praying that.in.the circumstancesstated in} Petition^{under Section} the affidavit^{filed in suPPort} ;i;li s:[gl,il""nxI ""#r,^{r'?'^?"' ffi ?"?i :1} =r"t*"J1f,"^{order dated 15 0} iot s in^{the interest of justrce'}

¶200

Counsel^{for the Appellants:SRl'B MAYUR REDDY' SC FOR TSRTc}

¶201

1: SRl.^{VLADIMEER KHATOON} Counsel^{for the ResPondent No'}

¶202

2: GP^{FOR TRANSPORT} Counsel^{for the ResPondent No'}

¶203

a) /,-⁾

¶204

WANo:^488OF201S

¶205

oi the Letters^{Patent preferred against]ne o'(er} Writ APPeal^{under clause15} ;'"i ;o'tn'i;^{wP.No.7'BB6/2019on the file of the} dated.16-04-2019^{passed in lA'No'} High Court.

¶206

Between:

¶207

Telanqana^{State Road Transport} -Corporation' -Rep^{bv its Vice Chairmanand} Ir/analing^{Director'B; Bi';;;;RTCCross Road'itlusireerabad' Hyderabad'}

¶208

The Divisional^{Engineer, T.ela.ngqlq State-Road TransportCorporation'} ' w;rr;g;i R"gIon,-wirangat Distric' Telangana state'

¶209

The Depot^{l\4anager,TelanganaState Road Transport Corporation'Warangal} District, Telangana^State

¶210

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶211

AND

¶212

1 Sri Ei, Patha i r 3 i,r'"Ei Samoath. S/o Bixapathi, eli""rviii^{oiit,i'.tB us Aged about Statio n Laxm 37 ifu years ra m' Occ Ha namkond License a'Holder} Warangal District.^{TblanganaState}

¶213

....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶214

2 The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department'} Telangana Secretaiiat,^Hyderabad.

¶215

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶216

lA NO: 1 F 2019

¶217

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the Order dated 16.04.2019^{passedin l.A.No.1of 2o19 in W.P.No.7886 of} 2019 in the interest ofjustice

¶218

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY,^{SC FOR TSRTC}

¶219

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. VLADIMEER KHATOON

¶220

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶221

WA NO: 495 OF 2019

¶222

Writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated.25-03-2019 passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in W.P. No 6010 of 2019 on the file of the High Court.

¶223

Between:

¶224

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and It/anaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, l,4usheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶225

The Divisional Manager (Ul, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal Region, Warangal District.

¶226

g Il g Regional lVlanager, TSRTC, Warangal Region, Warangal District. Telangana State.

¶227

- llg.Qepo! [/anager, TSRTC, District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶228

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶229

."''^{lo -}

¶230

AND

¶231

Ch. Raiu, S/o. Ch. Raiaiah, Ag.ed about 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o.H.No. 4_7ili?l$j}i[1ll.rra^{.ringaon:Wi;Grriidt'iZi,Li""nr"Horder or Kirana Shop.}

¶232

2 FlLzqle]! Rani, w/o. Prabhakar, Aged about 55 years, occ. Business, R/o 6-2)t6, Bataiinaqar, Janoaon, w3rdlszlbistriJt. li.'"i!" noriler or ce]#"'r!i,#Shop No.5. At Janga-on Bus Statioli

¶233

lVohammed Yakub. S/o l,4ohammed, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Business. R/o. H-No 3-s-30, Ganeshwada, .langro; \diLiiiibiriri.t. License Horder of Steer Shop No.7, At Jangaon Bus Stailon.

¶234

4 B..Narasimha Ramuru, S/o Vaikuntam,.Aged about 62 years. occ. Business. R/o H No.3-4-16/1. Nehru^park. Jargaon, Wa'rangalDsirrci. U";";; H;;;;';iF;;i Wear Shop No.2, At Jangaon BJs Station.

¶235

....RESPONDENTSiPETITIONERS

¶236

The State of relangana,.Rep. by its principal Secretary, Transport Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶237

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶238

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶239

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in l.A.No.1/2019 in W.P.No. 6010 of 2019, dated 25.03.2019 in the interest of justice.

¶240

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶241

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRl. SRINIVAS KAPATIA

¶242

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶243

WRIT APPEAL NO: 496 OF 2019

¶244

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^{preferred against the Order} dated 09.04.20'19,^passed in^{lA.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No. 7453 ol 20'19 on the file of the} High Court.

¶245

Between:

¶246

Telangana State Road^{Transport Corporation,. Rep- by its ViceChairman} ,and tVana[ing Director, Bus Bhavan.^{RTCCross Road, [t4usheerabad, Hyderabad}

¶247

The Regional^{l,4anager,TelanganastateRoadTransportcorporation, warangal} Region,-Waranga^I District.^{TelanganaState}

¶248

The Depot Manaqer,^{Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, DistrictBus} Station,' Hanmako-'nda,^{Warangal District' TelanganaState.}

¶249

..,APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶250

AND

¶251

1 Sri lv1d. Naseeruddin, S/o.^{Md.Raheemuddin, Aged about 44-years,Occ'} iicense Holder, Stall Space^{(Pop-Corn Stall), at District Bus Station,} Hanamkonda, R/o.H.^{No.3-4-300/AJ1} ,^{New Raipura,Warangal District' Telangana} State.

¶252

....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶253

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary, TransportDepartment,} Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶254

.,.RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶255

lA NO:^{1 OF 2019}

¶256

P etition^{under section1 5 1 cPc ql?vi"s..tl'1,I:Jt3JJ[H.'J'i:1'::1t:Si:} .nIUil';t,'Ulltt-.;!llB 5:l]i1,"'i"^l,Jli J'iio,.g' w^{p i\o 7453or} 2019 in the interest^of .iustice

¶257

Counsel for^{the Appellants:SRl'B MAYUR REDDY' SC FOR TSRTC}

¶258

Counsel forthe^{Respondent No' 1: SRI' MIR MUKARRAM ALI}

¶259

Counsel^{for the Respondent No 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT}

¶260

WA NO: 503^{OF 2019}

¶261

WritAppealunderclausel5oftheLettersPatentfiledagainsttheorderdated fi_oq_ioitgpassea^{in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in wp No. 7386 of 2019 on the file of the High} Cou rt.

¶262

Between:

¶263

Telanoana state Road^{Transportcorporation, Rep. by its Vice chairman} ,and lVlana[ing Director, Bus^{Bhavan,RTCCross Road, l\4usheerabad, Hy6eraDao.}

¶264

The Regional lr/lanager,^{TSRTC, Warangal Region, warangalDistrict. Telangana} State.

¶265

The Depot Manager,^{TSRTC, District Bus Station,Hanamkonda,WL-1 Depot,} Warangal District, Telangana State.

¶266

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶267

AND

¶268

1 Sri Gudise Vijender,, S/o Sri fr/allaiah, Aged about 35^{years, Occ. License} Holder, Stall Space (Soda and Cool Drinks), At Central Bus Station, Hanamkonda, R/o H.HNo.7-1-'1 31i B, Laxmipuram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, Telangana State

¶269

...,RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶270

2 The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶271

,.,RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶272

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶273

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in LA.No.1/2019 in W.P,No. 7386 of 2019, dated 10.04.2019 in the interest of justice.

¶274

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶275

Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1: SRl. MIR MUKARRAM ALI

¶276

Counsel forthe Respondent No. 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶277

WA NO: 572OF 2019

¶278

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order daled 12-04-2019 passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in WP.No.7742 of 2019 on the fite of the High Court.

¶279

Between:

¶280

'1 . Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and [/lanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, [r,4usheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶281

,"\--

¶282

TheRegional Manager, TSRTC, Warangal Region, Warangal District, Telangana 3. The Deoot l/anaoer TSRTC, District Bus Station, Hanamkonda, warangar District, ielanganistite.

¶283

.,.APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶284

AND

¶285

1 Yd.Tquddin,^{S/o. Gousuddin Aged33 years Occ.} Business, R/o. H.No.4_3_37, Gundlagadda, Jangaon District^-

¶286

2 .1 ARaju, S/o. Laxminarayana, Aged 43 years Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.5-ig/D/ ,^[,4ain Road Nellultla, Lingala dhanpur NllinOrf , Jang6an District.

¶287

.) Juluri Santhosh, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.2-9-30, Bus Stand Road, Jangaon, Wararigal District.

¶288

4 Nethi Ramulu, S/o. Veeraswamy, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.2-3-29. Nagulakunta. Jangaon, Warangal District.

¶289

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶290

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶291

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed in l.A.No.1/2019 in W.P.No. 7742 of 2019, dated 12.04.2019 in the interest of^justice.

¶292

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶293

Gounsel for the Respondents:SRl. N. SRIKANTH GOUD

¶294

WA NO: 697 OF 2019

¶295

writ Appeal under clause 15^{of the Letters Patent preferred against the order} dated 28.06.20.19, Passed^{in lA 1/19 in w.P.No.11652 of 2019 on the file of the High} Court.

¶296

Between:

¶297

I Telangana State Road^{TransportCorporation,} .B"P^{b.V its Vice Chairmanand} It/ana!ing Director, Bus^{Bhavan,lVtusheerabad, Hyderabad.}

¶298

2 The Regional l,4anager,^{TelanganaState Road Transport Corporation,Ir/edak} Region, Sanga Reddy

¶299

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶300

AND

¶301

S. Vivek Kumar, S/o Lala^{Prasad, Aged about 30 years' Licence Holder of (1)} Bakery Stall and⁽²⁾ Cool^{Drinks, Ice Cream Parlour and FruitJuice in Jogipet} Bus Station, lVedak District.

¶302

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶303

IANO:1O F 20'19

¶304

Petition under Section 5 of^{LimitationAct prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased} to condone the delay of^{(4) days in filing the writ appeal againstthe interim order} LA.No.1 ot 2019 in W.P.No. 11652 of^{2019,dated 28.06.2019 in the interestof} justice.

¶305

,-'>'

¶306

IANo: OF 2019

¶307

Petition^{under Section1} o"t⁵¹ tne^{CPC peirtion' praying the} ' that^{H gh} ' i n the^Couci rt rcumstances mav be Pleased^statedinto 19 in W.P,No,11652^of the afficlavit^{filed in} "ppin oo zO19^{passed in I A'No 1 of 20} suspend^{the order o,t"a} -zd 2019 in the^{interest ot} lusllce^'

¶308

Counsel for^{the Appellant:SRI' B MAYUR REDDY' SC FOR TSRTC}

¶309

Counsel^{for the Respondent: SRI' C RAMACHANDRA RAJU}

¶310

WA NO : 730^{oF 2019}

¶311

se 15 of the^{Letters Patent preferred against orderdated} Writ Appeal^underclau t7t iorc in^{w.P No. 8890 of 2019 on the file of the High} 25-04-2019 Passed^{in lA.No} Court.

¶312

Between:

¶313

1 Telanoana State Road^{TransportCorporationRep by its CMD' Bus Bhavan'} RTC dross Road, Musheerabad,^Hyderabad.

¶314

2 The Reoional lvlanaqer,^{Telangana State Road Transport Corporation' Office of} the Regional tr/anager,^{SecunderabadRegion'}

¶315

...APPELLANTS

¶316

AND

¶317

l,4/s. Nirmal Foundation^{Social Service Organization,Rep. by it: Chairman} Mr. Anil Kumar, S/o,^{Harihar Singh, R/o Unit No.'14,4th Floor,TopazBuilding,} Amrutha Hills, Punjagutta,^{Hyderabad - 500082.}

¶318

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶319

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶320

Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleased} to condone the delay of ( 67 )days in filing the writ appeal against the^{interim order} in l.A.No.1 o'f 2019 in W.P.No. 8890 of 20'1 9, dated 25.04.2019, in the^interest of justice,

¶321

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶322

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 25.04.201 9 passed in l.A.No.'1 of 2019 in W.P.No.B990 of 2019 in the interest of^justice

¶323

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶324

Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. AADESH VARMA

¶325

WA NO: 756 OF 2019

¶326

Writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent preferred against Order Dated 2110112019 Passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in W.P.No.549 of 2019 on the file of the High Court.

¶327

Between:

¶328

Telangana State Road Transporl Corporation, Rep, by its Vice Chairman and lVanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Road, [Vusheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶329

The Regional l,4anager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal Region, Warangal District.

¶330

\Li'

¶331

3 I:3 3l:i?,i:l#EliB?Ji..l?,,.nana^{state Roadrransport corporation, waransar}

¶332

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶333

AND

¶334

J Naresh. s/o. Sailu, Aged 32 years, Licensee of i) First Aid and lt/edicar Shoo. ii) clock Room, iii) Tea,toffee-'ant lnin cJni"]'i,il's;E;N/;;[i, ;ibfi;; ""' Bhandar and Noodtes at CBS/HNK, W;r"6;i Di;i;"i.

¶335

2 Y._l-r.ygSfi^{W/o Balaram, Aged 46 years,} Licensee of Cycle and Scooter Stand At CBS/HNK, Warangal Distnci.

¶336

J A.Sravanthi, W/o. A.Praveen Kumar, Licensee of i) Electrical, Mobile and Accessories, 1)-lVedical^{and_GeneralShop,iii) lnternet,Oip'anO} Xerox.lv) Fast Food centre cc-6 and cc-7, v) oormitori ioio Disperisiry erildiiUiii ol&ii"i' Bus Station Hanamkonda, Warangal Distiici.

¶337

4 A.Chandra Shekhar, S/o. Jagadeshwar, Aged 41 years, Licensee of Sweet and Snack Bar Stall No.12 at District Bus Station, Han'amkonda, Warangal DistriCt.

¶338

5 A.Praveen Kumar, S/o Padmanabham, Aged 37 years, Licensee of Fast Food Centre At CBS/HNK, Warangal District^-

¶339

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶340

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶341

Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of ( 69) days in filing the writ appeal against the interim order dated 21-01-2019 in WP.No,549 of 2019 in the interest of^justice.

¶342

lA NO: 3 OF 2019

¶343

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the orders^passed in l.A.No.1/20'19 in^{W.P.No. 549 ol 2019' dated} 21 .01.2019 in the interest of^justice

¶344

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl.^{B MAYUR REDDY, SC FORTSRTC}

¶345

Counsel for the Respondents: SRl.^{NARGIS AFSHAN KHAN}

¶346

WA NO: 772OF 2019

¶347

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the^{Letters Patent preferred against the order} dated 01/08/2019^passed in^{lA.No.1 of 2019 in W.P. No. 15808 of 2019 on the file of} the High Court.

¶348

Between:

¶349

I Telanoana State Road Transport Corporation,^{Rep by its Vice Chairman and} N/ana!ing Director, Bus Bhavan.^{RTCCross Road. I\ilusheerabad, Hyderabad}

¶350

2 The Regional l,4anager,^Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Nizamabad Region, Nizamabad District

¶351

..APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶352

AND Sri P. Vinod Kumar Patil, Aged about 29^years, Licence^holder of^WaterKiosk Stall in Banswada Bus Station, and Sweets, Bakery^{and Cool DrinksStallin} Nizamabad Bus Station.

¶353

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶354

<.-'<

¶355

IAN O:^'tO F 2019

¶356

stated in Petition^{the affidavit under Sectifiled} ;; on ;;";;lihe 5^{of Ljmitation Act petition' praying tiie nigr' that court} ^in^{the mav circumstancesb" plelt-:l} ,.la/q in filino the wrtt^{appeal against the interim o.rder ln} to condone^{the delaYof (2} ibaoizors.^{o"ateo ottoalzolg in the interest ol lustrce} l.A. No.1i2O'19^{in W P No}

¶357

IAN O:2O^{F 2019}

¶358

Petition^{under Section 151 CPC prayingthat. in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{filed in .rpplt} "i'tf'"^{n"[it'-Jn"the Hioh Court may be pleasedto} suspend^{the orders pur.J'inf.n.No.tof 2019 in fil.p.tto.tSAOAof 2019,dated} OltOBl2Olg^{in the interest of justice'}

¶359

Counsel for the^{Appellants:SRl'B MAYUR REDDY' SC FOR TSRTC}

¶360

Counsel forthe^{Respondent: SRI' C RAMACHANDRA RAJU}

¶361

WA NO: 89S OF²⁰¹⁹

¶362

se 15 of the^{Letters Patent preferred against orderdated} Writ Appeal under^clau 02-04-2019^{passedin lA. No} 1 of 2019 in W.P No.^{6905 of 2019 on the file of the High} Co u rt.

¶363

Between:

¶364

Telanoana state Road^{Transport corporation. Rep. by its Vicechairmanand.} fVfinJdng OireCtor. Bus^{Bhavdn.RTCCross Road. Musheerabad,Hyderabad.}

¶365

The Chief civil Engineer,,^{TelanganaState Road Transportcorporation, Bus} Bhavan, RTC Cross Road,^{I,4usheerabad,Hyderabad.}

¶366

The Regional Manager,^{TelanganastateRoad Transportcorporation warangal} Warangal District

¶367

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS

¶368

AND

¶369

T. Venkateswarlu, S/o Late Lingaiah, Aged about 52^years, Occ.^{Business, Office} at H.No.1B-104, Shanthi Nagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda^District.

¶370

...RESPONDENT

¶371

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶372

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend orders passed in l.A.No.1 o'f 2019 in W.P.No. 6905 of 2019, dated 02.04.2019.

¶373

Counsel for the Appellants:SRl. B MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC

¶374

Counsel for the Respondent: SRl. P CHAKRAVARTHY

¶375

The Court delivered the following.

I I

llcLrs \o 28-,19

._\ l)

W.A.Nos.7l0. 99. 371. 374, 385. 387, 398, 399, 483, 48S. 486, 487, 188, 495.^2196. 503, s72, 697. 730. 756. 772 & 899 of 2019

¶381

CON{MON .IUDG}'IIiNT: u,cr rhe non'btc lhe Chief Jusricc Himll Kohtr)

¶382

L The appellauts are aggrieved by the orders passed by the lcarned Singlc Jucigc- in difltrent rvrit petitior.rs liled by the respondents scciiing ro clircct the appellants Io collect monthl) licenoe icc flonr therr ri.iihoLrL in-sistirtg orl l)a<sup>r,'rcrlL oi CST^{aiong ri'iththe} lici:nce lce. dr-tIing Ll:l t-.c;ltictrc)^()l i^{,! '.</sup> ilt llctitiol-ts.}

¶383

2, [3r :-rcplrttc ,]r'alri: il':cii^lri re^{\ r'rL petiLions. tllo lcalrlctl} Singie .ludge glitnl.(l :ill^{lLir.'r lr:ioiiel as pla)'ed for brrhe} respondents,/\ riL^{pcL;tiorrcr-s.Iir oLheI r'rotds.Llle appeilants have been} reslraiued fi.oln^{collectingthe ciS'falongwith the Iicence f'ee lron'r the} respondents/writ^{petirioners.Aggrieved by the saidinterim orders' the} preseut intra-court^{appeals have been filcdBy separateorderspassed} in each of the^{appeals.operatiorl ot'thc interim orderspassed in lhe} \,rit petitions^{has beeli stal'ed -l'he said order is continuing to operate} t ill d ate,

¶384

-1^, \ie hat c enclLrtrcd^{il'o[r jearl'.:t1ge111-1-sclibr l]-re f'artiesas to thc} -status^{of tl're ri rit Peritions tllecl Llr thcre -sponderrts' Lcarnedcounsel} -qli]tethatlhcplcllclll.rls]illl.ltlsLol.tjlr-ri'l.iLpetitionsar.ccorl.ipleteand

¶385

11/.A.No.7lA^{of 20 19 atrd batclt}

¶386

Fqt lof²

¶387

they are^{riPe for finalargumentsllowever, no actual date hasbeen} ilxed,

¶388

Leamed^{counsel tbr the partiesagreethat instead of pressing} the^{presentappealsor the vacate stay appticationsmoved by the} appellants^{and still pending in the writ petitions' it would be} appropriate^{ilLhe * riL pelrtrcns :irr laiil:rl ''lp lbi ilnal hearrngancl} ll,spcsal.^{'lhel srar'e tilllL lr: thc laci si:Ltaliotl :n all rll" tll'lllt-'l- i:} :rin',ost sit'nilei^{ttlcl :n:rli} .^{oilrtll:cq:rcsL tilc loart-rcdSingLi:JuclgeLir} trcai W.l).No^{I i5il-i ol'l(l l!(-ir.li-l -',ll rl',:tile i ol' \".-'\o'lI 0 o1 101!rt'} a-r the leiid lllattel^{ti)r IlLllll()sai:rrl} 'll!lllll':1i!

¶389

5 .\ccorclirlgll. t ilil^{Ll:l citlltl'"1''l ol illc} l''iilties^{tlle ptescnt appeaLs} are disposed o1- along^,'rithLhc 1:orrtling^{appiications.iL' anl'^ rvhilc} confirming the interinr^{orderspasse(l in the appeals,the parties shall} appear belore the lealned Single^{jutigein the pending wlit petitions}

¶390

on 25.03.202 1 , lol an actual datc to i,.c tlxed lor arglrme nts.

¶391

SD/-CH.VENKATESWARU^LU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal Secretary,^{TransporlDepartment, State of Telangana' Telangana} Secretariat,^HYderabad z 6n" CC to'Sr'1^{B vavurReddvSC 'or TSRTC tOl99l} 5. o;; cc io Sri.^{c. RimacnancjraRalu, Ad-vocate (oPUC)}

¶396

One CC to^{Sr,. Karan Talwar. Advocate (UPUUI} s One CC to Sn.^{V. Ajay Kr,ma' Aovocate(OPUC)^} - 6, On; CC to Sri.^{Nargis'Afsnan Khan, Advocale-!Ol!C)} 7 One CC to Sri.^{lVir L/ukarram Ali, Advocate (OPUC)} e. One CC to Sri.Vladimeer^{Khatoon , Advocate (OPUC)} S. One CC to Sri. Srinivas^{Kapalia.AovocateO?!C'-}

¶397

One CC to Sri.^{N. SrikantnGoudAdvocate (OPUC)}

¶398

11.One CC to Sri. Aadesh^{Varrna. Advocate rOPUC</sup> iZ.inJS*tlo" Oticei,^{Writ Filing Section, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad,} t5.The Section Officer; Writ^{PostingSection, High Court of Telanganaat} Hvderabad.}

¶399

Ohe CC to Sri^P Chakravarthv^{Advocate (OPUC)} i s. i*o CCsio GP for Transport-High^{Courl bf Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)} 16. Two CD Copies.

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/03/2021

Note: Post on WPs 2i.03.2021

¶404

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶405

WA.No.710 99, 371, 374, 385, 387, 398, 399, 483, 485 486, 487 ,488, 495, 496, 503, 572, 697 , 730, 756, 772 & 899 of 2019

¶406

H E s rA 16
J
oo 24it2021
(,)
* *
i
'li. PAT c

¶407

Disposing of the^WAs

¶408

<br>q

Telangana State Road Transportation Corporation, v. P. Ravinder

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Telangana State Road Transportation Corporation, v. P. Ravinder

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Telangana Tribal Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society Vs Deshaboina Veerababu and 158 Others

M/s. Hajee A.P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s. Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd.

Basanagari Mallesham Vs Deshaboina Veerababu

Narra Ramakrishna and 4 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Pasula Raja Lingam Vs The State of Telangana and 5 Others

State of Telangana, Vs Vegetable Commission Agents Welfare Association (