Dismissed

M/s. Hajee A.P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd.

Telangana HC8 Mar 2021COMCA/4/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed two commercial court appeals after the appellants and respondents mutually agreed to proceed before the learned Arbitrator. Consequently, the appeals were disposed of along with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Appeals closed and disposed of as per the parties' agreement to proceed before the Arbitrator.

M/s. Hajee A.P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s. Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd. — Telangana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

COMMERCIAL COURT APPEAL N os:4 OF 2021 and47 oi2020

¶7

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE.co MMERCIAL COURT - CUM XXIV ADDITI ONAL CHIEF J UDGE: CITY CIVIL COURT. HYDERABAD

¶8

COMCA NO. : 4 OF 2021

¶9

Between:

¶10

I,4/s. Hajee A,P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Having its Regional Office . HAPBCO Towers, Ptot No. 3,7-4-2711A,2"d Floor, Ameerpei, Hyderibad 500 018 through its Authorized Representative Mr. It4unas E.K.

¶11

...AppellanU Respondent

¶12

AND

¶13

Mis. Rain Cll Carbon (Vizag) Ltd, having its corporate and registered office. at 34, Rain Centre, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad 73, rep. by its Managing Director

¶14

,.,RespondenU Petitioner

¶15

Commercial Court Appeal Under Section^'13 R/w. 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 r/w. Section 96 of CPC praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the present Appeal and set aside the Docket Order dated 07.01 .2021 in COP No. 1 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Commercial Court - Cum-XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and the Consequential Docket orders daled 1910112021 and2210112021 passed in COP No. 1 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Commercial Court - Cum-XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad by directing the Lower Court to dispose of the COP No. 1 of 2021 on merits according to law, duly following the principles of natural justice, giving reasonable time to the Appellant herein to file Counter in [,4ain C.O.P.No. 1 of 2021 and after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to both sides.

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of the operation of the Docket Order dated 07.O1 .2021 in COP No. 1 of 202'l on the file of the court of the Judge, Commercial Court-cum-XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and further also grant stay of the operation of the consequential Docket Orders dated 19.01.2021 and22.01 .2021 passed in COP No. 1

¶18

of2o2lonthefileofl.hecourtoftheJudge,CommercialCourt.cum-XXlVAdditional Chief Judge,^{City Civil Court, Hyderabad pending disposalof the present Appeal '}

¶19

IANO:2 o^{F 2021}

¶20

Petitionundersectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit^{fired in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleasedto permit the} petition to file^{the noticedated 27 '01 '2021 of the respondent herein and the reply} notice dated^{01.02.2021of the petitionerherein, arongwith the postal receipt as} Additionar^{Documentsin support of coMCA No 412021for adiudication of colt/cA} No 412021^.

¶21

COMMERCIAL^{COURTAPPEAL NO: 47 oF 2020}

¶22

Between:

¶23

Ivl/sHaieeA.P.BavaandCo'Constructions-PVtLtd.havinqitsRegionaloffice-rtoot'l'i'"erpetl Hvderabad 500 018 HAPBco Towers,^{Plot ruol ;i';;ii'i:;'-:j;d} irfiuld",t.^{A,;iioiLeo-nepresentativetVlr'MunasE K'}

¶24

...APPELLANT/^Petitioner

¶25

AND

¶26

1 M/s. Rain^{Cll Carbon(Viza-g)Ltd, Having its corporateand} by its^reoistered NTanagins^{office Directorat} 34, Rain^{Centre,Srtnag*i6r'"',ii,'Hvi"iuori?5,} '."p.

¶27

2.TheFederalBankLtd,ChaliyamBranch'KozhikodeDistrict'Kerala673301' "'RESPONDENTS/

¶28

Rep. by its^{Branch Manager} ResPondents

¶29

Commercia|CourtAppealUnderSectionl3R/w.37(1)(b)oftheArbitration& conciriation^{Act1 9g6 r/w. Section g6 0f cpc praying that this Hon',brecourt may be} pleasedtoallowtheappealandsetasidetheDocketorderdated0g/1212020in coP94of2O2OonthefileoftheCourtoftheJudge,CommercialCourt.cum.XXlV Addl.ChiefJudge,CityCivilCourt,Hyderabad,totheextentofimposingconditionon the Petitioner^{to discharge the statutory liabilitiesby making payment in respect of} those liabilities^{and to return advances by 21112t2020and giving liberty to the first} Respondenttoinvokethebankguaranteeafler2ltl2l2o20incasethePetitioner failed to fulfill^{the conditions imposedby that date and consequently modify the Order} ofad.interiminjunctionwithadirectiontotheLowerCourttodisposeofthematteron merits according^{to law after the first Respondententers appearanceafterreceiving} the notice^and Pass

¶30

IA NO 1 0F 2020

¶31

Petition under^{order 39Rule 1 and 2 ofCPC prayingthat in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court} may be^{pleased to grant temporary injunction against the Respondent restraininghim} from invoking^{the bank guarantee from 22t1212O2O lil 311O3t2021 the date by which} the^{period of validityof the bank guarantee would expire'}

¶32

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may^{be pleasedto vacate the} interim order granted vide order daled 22.12.2020^passed in lA.No.^112020in corvcA 47t2020 .

¶34

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶35

Petition under Order 41 Rule 5 R/w. Sec.^'151 of CPC^praying that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court} may be pleased to stay the operation of the Docket Order dated 0911212020^{in COP} No. 94 of 2020 on the file of the Judge, Commercial^{Court-cum-XXIVAddl.Chief} Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, to the extent of^{imposing conditionson the} Petitioner to comply with the statutory liabilities by making^{payment in respect thereof} and to return the alleged advances by^{2111212020 and giving liberty to the first} Respondent to invoke the bank^{guaranteein casethe Petitioner fails to fulfillthe} conditions by that date till the disposal of the Appeal^{and pass}

¶36

Counsel for the Appellant in both :^{Ms. S. NANDA}

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 in both :^{SRI A. VENKATESH}

¶38

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 in COMCA^{No. 47 of 2020: None appeared}

¶39

The Court delivered the following: Common Judgment

¶40

Iterns No.5-6

¶41

TIIE I'ION'BLE THE CTIIEF JT]STICII IIIMA KOIII,I

¶42

ANI)

¶43

I'HE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE, B. VIJAYSEN II.EDDY

¶44

COMCA Nos.4 of 2021 ^nd 47 of 2020

¶45

COMMON JUDGMENT:^(l'cr the or!'blc the Clhief.lustice^tlimaKohli)

¶46

Both the parties state that now that they are appearing belore the learned Arbitrator, the present appeals may be closecl

¶47

lll 2. Ms. S. Nanda, learned counsel {br thc appcllar,L COMCA.No.4 of 2021 assures thc Court tl.raL the ban[<^guarantee olfered by her client, r,vhich is lil<ely to erpire at the end o1'Nlarch" 2021 shall be kept alive, till furthcr ordels are perssed by tiie leamecl A rbitrator.^"l-he appellant shall be bound by the directions issLred ir.r para 8 of thc order dated 27.01.2021 in COMCr.No.4 ol 2.021.

¶48

Both the preserlt appeals are accordingl), disposcd ol.along rvith

¶49

the pending applications, ifany.

¶50

,TRUE COPY//

¶51

SD/. K.SRINIVASA^RAO JOINT REGISTRAR N,,'/

SECTION OFFICER

l,TheJudge,CommercialCourt-CumXX|VAdditionalChiefJudge:CityCivil Court, HYderabad

¶57

Court, HYderabad

¶58

1. M;. ML;a;^{E.K., Authorized Representativeof.tvl/s Haiee A P Bava and co'} constructions^{P!'t. Ltd.' ii;i;;il.R;si""'ig1t1t9 HAirBCo Towers'Plot No 3'} 1-q-ilnA,i*^{Floor, Ameerpet, Hyderabad50.0 018}

¶59

S. ffrl^{Hrfana'gingDirecior,'frl'1..'n"'inbit Carbon(Vizao) Ltd. having its corporate} and reqistered^{office. at 5+, nji' C"tt'"' Srina'garCotony' Hyderabad73}

¶60

One Ce to^{Ms. S. Nanda,Advocate tof-9.91-}

¶61

One CC^{to Sri A. Venkatesh,Advocate IOPUUI}

¶62

Two CD^CoPies

KVL \ V

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/03/2021

COMMON JUDGMENT

COMMERCIAL COURT^{APPEAL Nos: 4 OF 2021} and 47 ol^202O

¶68

I HE STA
(
oo 1 I I'IAR 2021
*
,:

¶69

DISPOSING OF^{THE BOTH THE APPEALS}

¶70

\6 5 ))

M/s. Hajee A.P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Hajee A.P. Bava and Co. Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Rain Cii Carbon (Vizag) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Zakir Hussain, B. E. Civil Vs The State of Telangana

G.Nirmala Vs The Registrar (Administration)

Om Prakash Modani Vs a P Mahesh Cooperative Bank Ltd.

Telangana Tribal Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society Vs Deshaboina Veerababu and 158 Others

Basanagari Mallesham Vs Deshaboina Veerababu

Kunja Ramudu Vs The State of Telangana