The High Court disposed of the writ appeal as infructuous because a survey had already been carried out. There is no order as to costs.
Writ appeal disposed of as infructuous; parties at liberty to take further remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2019
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the order dated 08-11-201Binl.A.No.1 of 2018in.W.P.No.38351 of 20lBonthefileof theHighCourt.
Between:
...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 6 and 7
AND
...,RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
7 M.Koteswara Rao S/o. M.Mallaiah, aged about 45years, Occ: Self Employed, Fi/o. H.No. 8-3-231 /333/8, Sri Krishna Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/^/RIT PETITIONERS
lA NO: 3 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the Order in l.A.No.1 of 20'18 in W.P.No. 38351 of 2018, dated 08-11-2018 pending the above Writ Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI M. SUDHIR KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD
The Court made the following: OROER
L
/
THE HOI{ 'BLE THE SATISH CIIANDRIT
AND THE HON ,BLE SRI JUSTICE N.
WRIT APPEAL No.S of 2079
JUDGMENT: t'er ttte Hon,ble tfu, Chief ,Justi.,.. Sotislt (.itan(lr.t sttentu,
Learr ed counsel for the appellants is fair enough in informing this Court that a survey has already been carried out rendering the writ appeal infructuous. The.vrit appeal is accordingly, disposed of as infructuour. The parties shall be at liberty to take further rec( urse to the remedies available under the law. The m scellaneous applications pending in this writ appeal, if e ny, shall stand closed. There shali be no order as to ( osts.
To,
S D/-CH.V-EII KATE SWAR U L U //TRUE coPy// DEPUZY-REGISTRAR SECTIbN OFFICER
1 2 lllili,l;i1llr',f'Bi?['31 ,n" .,u,u or reransana at 3 iyr",ar"* ial 4 "Ysi I ff3 33 B":i:yV Durga prasad, Advocate lopUCr 5,. One Spare Copl MP &- BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:02112121t21
JUDGMENT
WA.No.S of 2011
-,r::=-.-=::-
x ,:1BE srAi {.c\ ;N
(, 2 7 Dic tcfll
DlsPostNG oF t'HE WRIT AppEAL,AS TNFRUCTUOUS/ WITHOUT COS] S,
v
2\ \1/
<br>0
Ananya Infra Projects Private Limited
S. Rama Devi
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records
The Mandal Surveyor
Satish Chandra Sharma
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
